ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools
Authors: Andres M Bran, Sam Cox, Andrew D White, Philippe Schwaller
AI-generated Key Points
- Chemistry-related problems are challenging for large-language models (LLMs) due to limited access to external knowledge sources.
- ChemCrow is an LLM chemistry agent designed to tackle tasks across organic synthesis, drug discovery, and materials design.
- ChemCrow integrates 13 expert-designed tools to augment LLM performance in chemistry and unlock new capabilities.
- Evaluation of ChemCrow's effectiveness includes both LLM and expert human assessments that demonstrate its ability to automate a diverse set of chemical tasks.
- GPT-4 as an evaluator cannot distinguish between clearly wrong GPT-4 completions and GPT-4 + ChemCrow performance, raising concerns about potential misuse of such tools like ChemCrow and highlighting the importance of responsible use.
- Responsible use of such tools can aid expert chemists while lowering barriers for non-experts and foster scientific advancement by bridging the gap between experimental and computational chemistry.
- With further development and responsible use, ChemCrow has the potential to significantly impact scientific research in various domains related to chemistry.
Abstract: Large-language models (LLMs) have recently shown strong performance in tasks across domains, but struggle with chemistry-related problems. Moreover, these models lack access to external knowledge sources, limiting their usefulness in scientific applications. In this study, we introduce ChemCrow, an LLM chemistry agent designed to accomplish tasks across organic synthesis, drug discovery, and materials design. By integrating 13 expert-designed tools, ChemCrow augments the LLM performance in chemistry, and new capabilities emerge. Our evaluation, including both LLM and expert human assessments, demonstrates ChemCrow's effectiveness in automating a diverse set of chemical tasks. Surprisingly, we find that GPT-4 as an evaluator cannot distinguish between clearly wrong GPT-4 completions and GPT-4 + ChemCrow performance. There is a significant risk of misuse of tools like ChemCrow and we discuss their potential harms. Employed responsibly, ChemCrow not only aids expert chemists and lowers barriers for non-experts, but also fosters scientific advancement by bridging the gap between experimental and computational chemistry.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.