Formation of Massive Counterrotating Disks in Spiral Galaxies

Authors: Aniruddha R. Thakar (Ohio State University), Barbara S. Ryden (Ohio State University)

Accepted by ApJ, 22 pages, uuencoded compressed Postscript. 18 Figures (compressed Postscript) available from anonymous ftp at ftp://bessel.mps.ohio-state.edu/pub/thakar/cr1/figs.ps.Z A complete (text+figs) compressed PostScript preprint is also available at ftp://bessel.mps.ohio-state.edu/pub/thakar/cr1/pp.ps.gz
License: not stated (all rights reserved)

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: astro-ph/9510053v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In this study, the formation of a massive counterrotating gas disk in a spiral galaxy is investigated through numerical simulations. The researchers utilized a hierarchical tree gravity solver and sticky-particle gas dissipation scheme to explore three mechanisms: episodic and continuous gas infall, as well as a merger with a gas-rich dwarf galaxy. The results indicate that both episodic and continuous gas infall can effectively generate a significant counterrotating disk without disrupting the stability of the existing disk. However, it is crucial for the gas to be well-dispersed in phase-space and not form concentrated clumps before being absorbed by the disk galaxy. The initial angular momentum of the gas plays a critical role in determining the scale length of the formed counterrotating disk and its formation time. Careful control of the infall rate is necessary to prevent excessive heating of the preexisting disk. Generally, it is easier to produce a smaller counterrotating disk compared to an extensive one with a similar scale length as the original prograde disk. Furthermore, this study suggests that a merger with a gas-rich dwarf galaxy may not be viable for producing a massive counterrotating disk. Only very small dwarf galaxies can create such disks without significantly increasing the thickness of the existing disk. Additionally, this process's time-scale is deemed prohibitively long, making it unlikely that multiple mergers could accumulate a massive counterrotating disk over cosmic timescales. Overall, these findings shed light on complex processes involved in forming massive counterrotating disks in spiral galaxies and highlight important factors such as angular momentum, rate of infall, and merger dynamics that influence their formation and stability.
AI-generated keywords: Counterrotating gas disk Spiral galaxy Numerical simulations Gas infall Merger dynamics

AI-generated Key Points

  • Formation of a massive counterrotating gas disk in a spiral galaxy investigated through numerical simulations
  • Three mechanisms explored: episodic and continuous gas infall, merger with a gas-rich dwarf galaxy
  • Episodic and continuous gas infall can generate significant counterrotating disk without disrupting stability
  • Gas must be well-dispersed in phase-space to avoid forming concentrated clumps before absorption by disk galaxy
  • Initial angular momentum of gas critical for scale length and formation time of counterrotating disk
  • Control of infall rate necessary to prevent excessive heating of preexisting disk
  • Easier to produce smaller counterrotating disk compared to extensive one with similar scale length as prograde disk
  • Merger with gas-rich dwarf galaxy may not be viable for producing massive counterrotating disk; only very small dwarf galaxies can create such disks without increasing thickness significantly
  • Time-scale for this process deemed prohibitively long, making it unlikely that multiple mergers could accumulate a massive counterrotating disk over cosmic timescales
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We present results of numerical simulations of the formation of a massive counterrotating gas disk in a spiral galaxy. Using a hierarchical tree gravity solver combined with a sticky-particle gas dissipation scheme for our simulations, we have investigated three mechanisms: episodic and continuous gas infall, and a merger with a gas-rich dwarf galaxy. We find that both episodic and continuous gas infall work reasonably well and are able to produce a substantial gas counterrotating disk without upsetting the stability of the existing disk drastically, but it is very important for the gas to be well-dispersed in phase-space and not form concentrated clumps prior to its absorption by the disk galaxy. The initial angular momentum of the gas also plays a crucial role in determining the scale length of the counterrotating disk formed and the time it takes to form. The rate of infall, i.e. the mass of gas falling in per unit time, has to be small enough to preclude excessive heating of the preexisting disk. It is much easier in general to produce a smaller counterrotating disk than it is to produce an extensive disk whose scale length is similar to that of the original prograde disk. A gas-rich dwarf merger does not appear to be a viable mechanism to produce a massive counterrotating disk, because only a very small dwarf galaxy can produce a counterrotating disk without increasing the thickness of the existing disk by an order of magnitude, and the time-scale for this process is prohibitively long because it makes it very unlikely that several such mergers can accumulate a massive counterrotating disk over a Hubble time.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Oct. 1995

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.