RAG-Reward: Optimizing RAG with Reward Modeling and RLHF

Authors: Hanning Zhang, Juntong Song, Juno Zhu, Yuanhao Wu, Tong Zhang, Cheng Niu

Preprint, work in progress
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2501.13264v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
, , , , In the realm of Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) with relevant knowledge to answer knowledge-intensive questions, there is a growing focus on optimizing RAG pipelines through reinforcement learning and reward models. While previous works have improved retrieval, generation, and evaluation processes, the role of reward models in reinforcement learning for RAG optimization has been underexplored. To address this gap, this paper introduces the concept of RAG-Reward, a dataset designed to facilitate hallucination-free, comprehensive, reliable, and efficient RAG. Building upon existing research by Jin et al. (2024) that utilizes reward models for evaluating Question-Answering tasks in RAG scenarios and demonstrates the feasibility of constructing RAG scenario data using LLMs, this work aims to train a RAG-specific reward model for alignment training. The integration of reward models and reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) aims to enhance LLMs' effectiveness in generating high-quality outputs within the RAG framework. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant potential in understanding and utilizing in-context information. By incorporating external knowledge bases into their outputs through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), LLMs can overcome challenges such as hallucinations and outdated knowledge. This approach has been widely adopted in various real-world applications, including chatbots and domain-specific experts in fields like finance and medicine. The construction of the RAG-Reward dataset is based on existing RAG datasets to ensure relevance across diverse use cases such as Question Answering, Data-to-Text, and Summarization scenarios. Experimental datasets like WebGLM, Yelp, and XSum are utilized to cover a wide range of circumstances where LLMs are tasked with generating responses based on web-retrieved reference data or structured input formats like JSON files. By systematically constructing RAG-scenario datasets and developing reward models tailored for these scenarios, this project aims to pave the way for evaluating and enhancing the generation quality of LLMs within the RAG framework. The experimental results demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on held-out test sets while showcasing the potential of using reinforcement learning with human feedback to improve RAG pipelines effectively.
AI-generated keywords: Retrieval-augmented generation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) with relevant knowledge for answering knowledge-intensive questions
  • Optimization of RAG pipelines through reinforcement learning and reward models is a growing focus
  • Introduction of RAG-Reward dataset to facilitate hallucination-free, comprehensive, reliable, and efficient RAG
  • Integration of reward models and reinforcement learning with human feedback aims to enhance LLMs' effectiveness in generating high-quality outputs within the RAG framework
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) with relevant and up-to-date knowledge, improving their ability to answer knowledge-intensive questions. It has been shown to enhance both generation quality and trustworthiness. While numerous works have focused on improving retrieval, generation, and evaluation, the role of reward models in reinforcement learning for optimizing RAG and establishing automated benchmarking pipelines remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce \textbf{RAG-Reward}, a dataset designed to enable \textit{hallucination-free, comprehensive, reliable, and efficient RAG}. We define four key metrics for assessing generation quality and develop an automated annotation pipeline that leverages multiple LLMs to generate outputs across diverse RAG scenarios. GPT-4o is used to evaluate and construct preference data. Using \textbf{RAG-Reward}, we train reward models and apply reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to improve LLMs' effectiveness in RAG. Experimental results show that our reward model achieves state-of-the-art performance on a held-out test set, demonstrating both the effectiveness of our approach and the quality of our dataset. Furthermore, the improved generation quality of the trained policy model highlights the feasibility of using RLHF to enhance RAG pipelines.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jan. 2025

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.