FusionLLM: A Decentralized LLM Training System on Geo-distributed GPUs with Adaptive Compression
Authors: Zhenheng Tang, Xueze Kang, Yiming Yin, Xinglin Pan, Yuxin Wang, Xin He, Qiang Wang, Rongfei Zeng, Kaiyong Zhao, Shaohuai Shi, Amelie Chi Zhou, Bo Li, Bingsheng He, Xiaowen Chu
AI-generated Key Points
- System created to address hardware scarcity in training large deep neural networks (DNNs), specifically large language models (LLMs)
- Designed for decentralized training using geo-distributed GPUs across computing clusters or individual devices
- Challenges in system design and efficiency include remote automatic differentiation (RAD), flexible model definitions, heterogeneous software support, low resource utilization due to heterogeneous hardware or the straggler problem, and slow network communication
- DNN model represented as a directed acyclic graph of operators (OP-DAG) for customization without low-level operator implementation concerns
- DAG runtime executor enables RAD without consistent low-level ML framework versions
- Workload estimator and OP-Fence scheduler implemented to increase throughput by grouping devices with similar bandwidths and partitioning the DAG
- AdaTopK compressor proposed to adaptively compress intermediate activations and gradients at slower communication links
- Experiments conducted on three real-world testbeds using 48 GPUs connected via 8 Mbps~10 Gbps networks showed FusionLLM achieving speedups ranging from 1.45 to 9.39 times compared to baseline methods while ensuring convergence under varying conditions
Abstract: To alleviate hardware scarcity in training large deep neural networks (DNNs), particularly large language models (LLMs), we present FusionLLM, a decentralized training system designed and implemented for training DNNs using geo-distributed GPUs across different computing clusters or individual devices. Decentralized training faces significant challenges regarding system design and efficiency, including: 1) the need for remote automatic differentiation (RAD), 2) support for flexible model definitions and heterogeneous software, 3) heterogeneous hardware leading to low resource utilization or the straggler problem, and 4) slow network communication. To address these challenges, in the system design, we represent the model as a directed acyclic graph of operators (OP-DAG). Each node in the DAG represents the operator in the DNNs, while the edge represents the data dependency between operators. Based on this design, 1) users are allowed to customize any DNN without caring low-level operator implementation; 2) we enable the task scheduling with the more fine-grained sub-tasks, offering more optimization space; 3) a DAG runtime executor can implement RAD withour requiring the consistent low-level ML framework versions. To enhance system efficiency, we implement a workload estimator and design an OP-Fence scheduler to cluster devices with similar bandwidths together and partition the DAG to increase throughput. Additionally, we propose an AdaTopK compressor to adaptively compress intermediate activations and gradients at the slowest communication links. To evaluate the convergence and efficiency of our system and algorithms, we train ResNet-101 and GPT-2 on three real-world testbeds using 48 GPUs connected with 8 Mbps~10 Gbps networks. Experimental results demonstrate that our system and method can achieve 1.45 - 9.39x speedup compared to baseline methods while ensuring convergence.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.