Federated Data-Efficient Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models
Authors: Zhen Qin, Zhaomin Wu, Bingsheng He, Shuiguang Deng
AI-generated Key Points
- Instruction tuning is crucial for enhancing large language models' responsiveness to human instructions.
- Federated learning leverages diverse client-side data sources to enhance LLM tuning.
- Traditional approaches to federated LLM tuning can lead to excessive computational overhead and overfitting local data.
- FedHDS is a novel approach that uses a representative subset of edge-side data (coreset) for fine-tuning LLMs.
- FedHDS reduces redundancy in data samples at both intra-client and inter-client levels through hierarchical data selection.
- Extensive experiments have shown that FedHDS significantly reduces the volume of data required for fine-tuning while improving responsiveness to unseen tasks in various scenarios.
- FedHDS has the potential to optimize LLM performance by efficiently utilizing instructional data within a federated learning framework.
Abstract: Instruction tuning helps improve pretrained large language models (LLMs) in terms of the responsiveness to human instructions, which is benefited from diversified instruction data. Federated learning extends the sources of instruction data by exploiting the diversified client-side data, making it increasingly popular for tuning LLMs. Existing approaches of federated LLM tuning typically traverse all local data during local training, bringing excessive computation overhead and posing a risk of overfitting local data. Thus, a federated data-efficient instruction tuning approach, which consumes relatively little data from the entire dataset, is needed. In response, this work introduces an approach of federated data-efficient instruction tuning for LLMs, FedHDS, which utilizes a representative subset of edge-side data, coreset, to tune the LLM. It reduces the redundancy of data samples at both intra-client and inter-client levels through a hierarchical data selection framework performed by jointly selecting a small number of representative data samples for local training without sharing the raw data. Extensive experiments conducted across six scenarios with various LLMs, datasets and data partitions demonstrate that FedHDS significantly reduces the amount of data required for fine-tuning while improving the responsiveness of the instruction-tuned LLMs to unseen tasks.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.