AI summary · arXiv: 2402.08051v1 · econ.EM
On Bayesian Filtering for Markov Regime Switching Models
The essentials
- Comprehensive framework for empirical analysis of dynamic macroeconomic models using Bayesian filtering
- Focus on state-space formulation of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models with multiple regimes
- Introduction of two families of powerful multiple-regime filters, IMM and GPB, along with corresponding smoothers
- Demonstration of computational robustness through simulation exercise based on a New Keynesian DSGE model
- Improvement in precision by approximately 25% in recovering unobserved variables
- Comparison showing the speed and accuracy advantages of the canonical IMM filter over competitors within IMM and GPB families
- Successful identification of significant past policy shifts in U.S. macroeconomic time series, including post-Covid-19 period
- Contribution to advancing empirical examination in dynamic models by addressing computational challenges and enhancing accuracy
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Deep Learning MacroeconomicsRafael R. S. Guimaraes · 2022 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
Limited datasets and complex nonlinear relationships are among the challenges that may emerge when applying econometrics to macroeconomic problems. This research proposes deep learning as an approach to transfer learning in the former case and to map relationships between variables in the latter case. Although macroeconomists already apply transfer learning when assuming a given a priori distribution in a Bayesian context, estimating a structural VAR with signal restriction and calibrating parameters based on results observed in other models, to name a few examples, advance in a more systematic transfer learning strategy in applied macroeconomics is the innovation we are introducing. We expl…
-
Modeling Macroeconomic Variations After COVID-19Serena Ng · 2021 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
The coronavirus is a global event of historical proportions and just a few months changed the time series properties of the data in ways that make many pre-covid forecasting models inadequate. It also creates a new problem for estimation of economic factors and dynamic causal effects because the variations around the outbreak can be interpreted as outliers, as shifts to the distribution of existing shocks, or as addition of new shocks. I take the latter view and use covid indicators as controls to 'de-covid' the data prior to estimation. I find that economic uncertainty remains high at the end of 2020 even though real economic activity has recovered and covid uncertainty has receded. Dynamic…
-
Robust decision-making under risk and ambiguityMaximilian Blesch, Philipp Eisenhauer · 2021 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
Economists often estimate economic models on data and use the point estimates as a stand-in for the truth when studying the model's implications for optimal decision-making. This practice ignores model ambiguity, exposes the decision problem to misspecification, and ultimately leads to post-decision disappointment. Using statistical decision theory, we develop a framework to explore, evaluate, and optimize robust decision rules that explicitly account for estimation uncertainty. We show how to operationalize our analysis by studying robust decisions in a stochastic dynamic investment model in which a decision-maker directly accounts for uncertainty in the model's transition dynamics.
-
Robust Synthetic ControlMuhammad Jehangir Amjad, Devavrat Shah, Dennis Shen · 2017 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
We present a robust generalization of the synthetic control method for comparative case studies. Like the classical method, we present an algorithm to estimate the unobservable counterfactual of a treatment unit. A distinguishing feature of our algorithm is that of de-noising the data matrix via singular value thresholding, which renders our approach robust in multiple facets: it automatically identifies a good subset of donors, overcomes the challenges of missing data, and continues to work well in settings where covariate information may not be provided. To begin, we establish the condition under which the fundamental assumption in synthetic control-like approaches holds, i.e. when the lin…
-
Nonparametric Tests of Tail Behavior in Stochastic Frontier ModelsWilliam, C. Horrace, Yulong Wang · 2020 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
This article studies tail behavior for the error components in the stochastic frontier model, where one component has bounded support on one side, and the other has unbounded support on both sides. Under weak assumptions on the error components, we derive nonparametric tests that the unbounded component distribution has thin tails and that the component tails are equivalent. The tests are useful diagnostic tools for stochastic frontier analysis. A simulation study and an application to a stochastic cost frontier for 6,100 US banks from 1998 to 2005 are provided. The new tests reject the normal or Laplace distributional assumptions, which are commonly imposed in the existing literature.
-
Bounds on Distributional Treatment Effect Parameters using Panel Data with an Application on Job DisplacementBrantly Callaway · 2020 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
This paper develops new techniques to bound distributional treatment effect parameters that depend on the joint distribution of potential outcomes -- an object not identified by standard identifying assumptions such as selection on observables or even when treatment is randomly assigned. I show that panel data and an additional assumption on the dependence between untreated potential outcomes for the treated group over time (i) provide more identifying power for distributional treatment effect parameters than existing bounds and (ii) provide a more plausible set of conditions than existing methods that obtain point identification. I apply these bounds to study heterogeneity in the effect of …
-
Econometric Inference with Machine-Learned Proxies: Partial Identification via Data CombinationLixiong Li · 2026 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
Empirical researchers increasingly use upstream machine-learning (ML) methods to construct proxies for latent target variables from complex, unstructured data. A naive plug-in use of such proxies in downstream econometric models, however, can lead to biased estimation and invalid inference. This paper develops a framework for partial identification and inference in general moment models with ML-generated proxies. Our approach does not require restrictive assumptions on the upstream ML procedure, such as consistency or known convergence rates, nor does it require a complete validation sample containing all variables used in the downstream analysis. Instead, we assume access to two datasets: a…
-
Adaptive Pricing in Insurance: Generalized Linear Models and Gaussian Process Regression ApproachesYuqing Zhang, Neil Walton · 2019 · Econometrics · AI summary available
Abstract
We study the application of dynamic pricing to insurance. We view this as an online revenue management problem where the insurance company looks to set prices to optimize the long-run revenue from selling a new insurance product. We develop two pricing models: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model. Both balance between exploration, where we choose prices in order to learn the distribution of demands & claims for the insurance product, and exploitation, where we myopically choose the best price from the information gathered so far. The performance of the pricing policies is measured in terms of regret: the expected revenue loss cause…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.