AI summary · arXiv: 2104.12573v4 · econ.EM

Robust decision-making under risk and ambiguity

Maximilian Blesch, Philipp Eisenhauer
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 23 Apr. 2021 License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Traditional economic models relying on point estimates overlook model ambiguity
  • This exposes decision-makers to misspecification and post-decision disappointment
  • Blesch and Eisenhauer propose a framework based on statistical decision theory
  • The framework allows for exploration, evaluation, and optimization of robust decision rules
  • Robust decision rules explicitly account for estimation uncertainty in economic models
  • Incorporating uncertainty into the decision-making process leads to more informed choices and risk mitigation
  • The authors apply their framework to a stochastic dynamic investment model
  • Decision-makers consider uncertainty in the model's transition dynamics when making investment decisions
  • Considering estimation uncertainty improves understanding of complex systems in economics
  • Adopting robust decision rules enhances accuracy and reliability of models while minimizing post-decision disappointment
  • Blesch and Eisenhauer's work contributes to advancing economics by offering a comprehensive framework for robust decision-making under risk and ambiguity.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Robust Decision-Making Risk and Ambiguity Statistical Decision Theory Stochastic Dynamic Investment Model Estimation Uncertainty

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper, "Robust decision-making under risk and ambiguity," economists Maximilian Blesch and Philipp Eisenhauer highlight the limitations of traditional economic models that rely on point estimates derived from data. They argue that this practice overlooks model ambiguity, exposes decision-makers to misspecification, and ultimately leads to post-decision disappointment. To address these issues, the authors propose a framework based on statistical decision theory that allows for the exploration, evaluation, and optimization of robust decision rules. These rules explicitly account for estimation uncertainty in economic models. By incorporating this uncertainty into the decision-making process, economists can make more informed choices and mitigate potential risks. To illustrate their approach, Blesch and Eisenhauer apply their framework to a stochastic dynamic investment model. In this model, decision-makers directly consider uncertainty in the model's transition dynamics when making investment decisions. By doing so, they are better equipped to handle unforeseen circumstances and adapt their strategies accordingly. The authors emphasize the importance of considering estimation uncertainty in economic modeling and decision-making processes. Their research provides valuable insights into how economists can improve their understanding of complex systems by accounting for inherent uncertainties. By adopting robust decision rules that explicitly incorporate estimation uncertainty, economists can enhance the accuracy and reliability of their models while minimizing post-decision disappointment. Overall, Blesch and Eisenhauer's work contributes to advancing the field of economics by offering a comprehensive framework for robust decision-making under risk and ambiguity. Their findings have implications for various areas within economics where accurate modeling is crucial for optimal decision-making.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Related
    Robust Synthetic Control
    Muhammad Jehangir Amjad, Devavrat Shah, Dennis Shen · 2017 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We present a robust generalization of the synthetic control method for comparative case studies. Like the classical method, we present an algorithm to estimate the unobservable counterfactual of a treatment unit. A distinguishing feature of our algorithm is that of de-noising the data matrix via singular value thresholding, which renders our approach robust in multiple facets: it automatically identifies a good subset of donors, overcomes the challenges of missing data, and continues to work well in settings where covariate information may not be provided. To begin, we establish the condition under which the fundamental assumption in synthetic control-like approaches holds, i.e. when the lin…

  2. Related
    On Bayesian Filtering for Markov Regime Switching Models
    Nigar Hashimzade, Oleg Kirsanov, Tatiana Kirsanova et al. · 2024 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This paper presents a framework for empirical analysis of dynamic macroeconomic models using Bayesian filtering, with a specific focus on the state-space formulation of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models with multiple regimes. We outline the theoretical foundations of model estimation, provide the details of two families of powerful multiple-regime filters, IMM and GPB, and construct corresponding multiple-regime smoothers. A simulation exercise, based on a prototypical New Keynesian DSGE model, is used to demonstrate the computational robustness of the proposed filters and smoothers and evaluate their accuracy and speed for a selection of filters from each family. We show …

  3. Related
    Nonparametric Tests of Tail Behavior in Stochastic Frontier Models
    William, C. Horrace, Yulong Wang · 2020 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This article studies tail behavior for the error components in the stochastic frontier model, where one component has bounded support on one side, and the other has unbounded support on both sides. Under weak assumptions on the error components, we derive nonparametric tests that the unbounded component distribution has thin tails and that the component tails are equivalent. The tests are useful diagnostic tools for stochastic frontier analysis. A simulation study and an application to a stochastic cost frontier for 6,100 US banks from 1998 to 2005 are provided. The new tests reject the normal or Laplace distributional assumptions, which are commonly imposed in the existing literature.

  4. Related
    Modeling Macroeconomic Variations After COVID-19
    Serena Ng · 2021 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The coronavirus is a global event of historical proportions and just a few months changed the time series properties of the data in ways that make many pre-covid forecasting models inadequate. It also creates a new problem for estimation of economic factors and dynamic causal effects because the variations around the outbreak can be interpreted as outliers, as shifts to the distribution of existing shocks, or as addition of new shocks. I take the latter view and use covid indicators as controls to 'de-covid' the data prior to estimation. I find that economic uncertainty remains high at the end of 2020 even though real economic activity has recovered and covid uncertainty has receded. Dynamic…

  5. Related
    Adaptive Pricing in Insurance: Generalized Linear Models and Gaussian Process Regression Approaches
    Yuqing Zhang, Neil Walton · 2019 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We study the application of dynamic pricing to insurance. We view this as an online revenue management problem where the insurance company looks to set prices to optimize the long-run revenue from selling a new insurance product. We develop two pricing models: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model. Both balance between exploration, where we choose prices in order to learn the distribution of demands & claims for the insurance product, and exploitation, where we myopically choose the best price from the information gathered so far. The performance of the pricing policies is measured in terms of regret: the expected revenue loss cause…

  6. Related
    A multi-cell experimental design to recover policy relevant treatment effects, with an application to online advertising
    Caio Waisman, Brett R. Gordon · 2023 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Experiments are an important tool to measure the impacts of interventions. However, in experimental settings with one-sided noncompliance, extant empirical approaches may not produce the estimates a decision-maker needs to solve their problem. For example, these experimental designs are common in digital advertising settings, but they are uninformative of decisions regarding the intensive margin -- how much should be spent or how many consumers should be reached with a campaign. We propose a solution that combines a novel multi-cell experimental design with modern estimation techniques that enables decision-makers to recover enough information to solve problems with an intensive margin. Our …

  7. Related
    Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Instruments
    Vasilis Syrgkanis, Victor Lei, Miruna Oprescu et al. · 2019 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We consider the estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects with arbitrary machine learning methods in the presence of unobserved confounders with the aid of a valid instrument. Such settings arise in A/B tests with an intent-to-treat structure, where the experimenter randomizes over which user will receive a recommendation to take an action, and we are interested in the effect of the downstream action. We develop a statistical learning approach to the estimation of heterogeneous effects, reducing the problem to the minimization of an appropriate loss function that depends on a set of auxiliary models (each corresponding to a separate prediction task). The reduction enables the use of all …

  8. Related
    Momentum Dynamics in Competitive Sports: A Multi-Model Analysis Using TOPSIS and Logistic Regression
    Mingpu Ma · 2024 · Econometrics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This paper explores the concept of "momentum" in sports competitions through the use of the TOPSIS model and 0-1 logistic regression model. First, the TOPSIS model is employed to evaluate the performance of two tennis players, with visualizations used to analyze the situation's evolution at every moment in the match, explaining how "momentum" manifests in sports. Then, the 0-1 logistic regression model is utilized to verify the impact of "momentum" on match outcomes, demonstrating that fluctuations in player performance and the successive occurrence of successes are not random. Additionally, this paper examines the indicators that influence the reversal of game situations by analyzing key ma…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.