AI summary · arXiv: 2006.07780v1 · econ.EM

Nonparametric Tests of Tail Behavior in Stochastic Frontier Models

William, C. Horrace, Yulong Wang
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 14 Jun. 2020 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • The article explores the analysis of tail behavior for error components in stochastic frontier models
  • Authors establish weak assumptions about error components and develop nonparametric tests
  • Tests assess if unbounded component has thin tails and if both components have equivalent tails
  • Tests serve as valuable diagnostic tools for conducting stochastic frontier analysis
  • Findings challenge commonly imposed normal or Laplace distributional assumptions
  • Methodology opens up avenues for more robust and accurate modeling techniques within stochastic frontier analysis

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Nonparametric Tests

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
, , , , The article "Nonparametric Tests of Tail Behavior in Stochastic Frontier Models" by William, C. Horrace, and Yulong Wang explores the analysis of tail behavior for error components in stochastic frontier models. The authors establish weak assumptions about the error components and develop nonparametric tests to assess whether the unbounded component has thin tails and if both components have equivalent tails. These tests serve as valuable diagnostic tools for conducting stochastic frontier analysis, providing insights into the underlying distributions of error components. Through a simulation study and an application to a stochastic cost frontier involving 6,100 US banks from 1998 to 2005, the authors demonstrate how these new tests can be applied in practice. Their findings challenge commonly imposed normal or Laplace distributional assumptions found in existing literature, contributing to a better understanding of tail behavior in stochastic frontier models. The methodology proposed by William, C. Horrace, and Yulong Wang opens up avenues for more robust and accurate modeling techniques within stochastic frontier analysis.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Close Cites this paper
    Specification tests for normal/gamma and stable/gamma stochastic frontier models based on empirical transforms
    C. Papadimitriou, S. Meintanis, B. Andrade et al. · 2022 · Econometrics and Statistics · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Goodness--of--fit tests for the distribution of the composed error term in a Stochastic Frontier Model (SFM) are suggested. The focus is on the case of a normal/gamma SFM and the heavy--tailed stable/gamma SFM. In the first case the moment generating function is used as tool while in the latter case the characteristic function of the error term is employed. In both cases our test statistics are formulated as weighted integrals of properly standardized data. The new normal/gamma test is consistent, and is shown to have an intrinsic relation to moment--based tests. The finite--sample behavior of resampling versions of both tests is investigated by Monte Carlo simulation, while several real--da…

  2. Close Cited by this paper
    Moment Diagnostics and Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Stochastic Frontier Model
    A. Papadopoulos, Christopher F. Parmeter · 2019 · Social Science Research Network · cited 4 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    The distributional specifications for the composite regression error term most often used in Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) are inherently bounded as regards their skewness and excess kurtosis coefficients. These bounds provide simple diagnostic tools and model selection/rejection criteria for empirical studies which appear to have been overlooked by practitioners. We derive general expressions for the skewness and excess kurtosis of the composed error term in the stochastic frontier model based on the ratio of standard deviations of the two separate error components as well as theoretical ranges for the most popular empirical specifications. Simulation results are presented to detail th…

  3. Close* Cited by this paper A method it uses
    Goodness of fit tests in stochastic frontier models
    Wen Wang, Christine E. Amsler, P. Schmidt · 2011 · Journal of Productivity Analysis · cited 43 times · Not summarized yet
  4. Close Cited by this paper
    Stationary Points for Parametric Stochastic Frontier Models
    W. Horrace, Ian A. Wright · 2019 · Journal of business & economic statistics · cited 27 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Abstract Stationary point results on the normal–half-normal stochastic frontier model are generalized using the theory of the Dirac delta, and distribution-free conditions are established to ensure a stationary point in the likelihood as the variance of the inefficiency distribution goes to zero. Stability of the stationary point and “wrong skew” results are derived or simulated for common parametric assumptions on the model. We discuss identification and extensions to more general stochastic frontier models.

  5. Close Cited by this paper
    Robust stochastic frontier analysis: a Student’s t-half normal model with application to highway maintenance costs in England
    P. Wheat, A. Stead, W. Greene · 2019 · Journal of Productivity Analysis · cited 49 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    The presence of outliers in the data has implications for stochastic frontier analysis, and indeed any performance analysis methodology, because they may lead to imprecise parameter estimates and, crucially, lead to an exaggerated spread of efficiency predictions. In this paper we replace the normal distribution for the noise term in the standard stochastic frontier model with a Student’s t distribution, which generalises the normal distribution by adding a shape parameter governing the degree of kurtosis. This has the advantages of introducing flexibility in the heaviness of the tails, which can be determined by the data, as well as containing the normal distribution as a limiting case, and…

  6. Close Cites this paper
    Penalized sieve estimation of zero‐inefficiency stochastic frontiers
    Jun Cai, W. Horrace, Christopher F. Parmeter · 2023 · Journal of applied econometrics · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Stochastic frontier models for cross‐sectional data typically assume that the one‐sided distribution of firm‐level inefficiency is continuous. However, it may be reasonable to hypothesize that inefficiency is continuous except for a discrete mass at zero capturing fully efficient firms (zero‐inefficiency). We propose a sieve‐type density estimator for such a mixture distribution in a nonparametric stochastic frontier setting under a unimodality‐at‐zero assumption. Consistency, rates of convergence and asymptotic normality of the estimators are established, as well as a test of the zero‐inefficiency hypothesis. Simulations and two applications are provided to demonstrate the practicality of t…

  7. Close Cites this paper
    Model uncertainty and efficiency measurement in stochastic frontier analysis with generalized errors
    Kamil Makieła, Błażej Mazur · 2022 · Journal of Productivity Analysis · cited 14 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Advanced efficiency measurement methods usually fall within Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), or their derivatives. Although SFA has some theoretical advantages, it has been criticized for relying on arbitrary and potentially restrictive assumptions about model specification. One strand of the literature suggests the use of nonparametric SF models to cope with the issue. We follow an alternative path and demonstrate that it is possible to deal with specification uncertainty and potentially restrictive assumptions while maintaining the advantages of the parametric approach. First, we develop a flexible stochastic model based on generalized t and generalized …

  8. Close* Cited by this paper A method it uses
    Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: A Monte Carlo analysis
    T. Coelli · 1995 · Journal of Productivity Analysis · cited 587 times · Not summarized yet

Prior work it builds on

  1. Close* A method it uses
    Efficiency Measurement with the Weibull Stochastic Frontier
    E. Tsionas · 2007 · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · cited 44 times · Not summarized yet
  2. Related Used in depth by this paper
    Density deconvolution with Laplace errors and unknown variance
    Jun Cai, W. Horrace, Christopher F. Parmeter · 2021 · Journal of Productivity Analysis · cited 6 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    We consider density deconvolution with zero-mean Laplace noise in the context of an error component regression model. We adapt the minimax deconvolution methods of Meister (2006) to allow estimation of the unknown noise variance. We propose a semi-uniformly consistent estimator for an ordinary-smooth target density and a modified "variance truncation device” for the unknown noise variance. We provide a simulation study and practical guidance for the choice of smoothness parameters of the ordinary-smooth target density. We apply restricted versions of our estimator to a stochastic frontier model of US banks and to a measurement error model of daily saturated fat intake.

  3. Related* Used in depth by this paper A method it uses
    NEARLY OPTIMAL TESTS WHEN A NUISANCE PARAMETER IS PRESENT UNDER THE NULL HYPOTHESIS
    Graham Elliott, Ulrich K. Müller, M. Watson · 2015 · Econometrica · cited 140 times · Not summarized yet
  4. Related* Used in depth by this paper A method it uses
    Efficiency and productivity of the US banking industry, 1998–2005: evidence from the Fourier cost function satisfying global regularity conditions
    Guohua Feng, Apostolos Serletis · 2009 · Journal of Applied Econometrics · cited 69 times · Not summarized yet
  5. Related*
    Fixed-k Asymptotic Inference About Tail Properties
    Ulrich K. Müller, Yulong Wang · 2017 · Journal of the American Statistical Association · cited 29 times · Not summarized yet

Papers that cite it

  1. Related*
    Accounting for intra-industry technological heterogeneity in the measurement of operations efficiency
    M. Tsionas, Pankaj C. Patel · 2023 · International Journal of Production Economics · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet
How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

Updated on 1 November 2026.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.