AI summary · arXiv: 2604.10770v1 · econ.EM
Econometric Inference with Machine-Learned Proxies: Partial Identification via Data Combination
The essentials
- Growing trend towards using machine-learning methods to create proxies for latent target variables from complex and unstructured data
- Plugging in these proxies into downstream econometric models can lead to biased estimation and unreliable inference
- Introduction of a framework for partial identification and inference within general moment models utilizing ML-generated proxies
- Framework leverages two distinct datasets: a downstream sample with observed covariates and the proxy variable, and an auxiliary validation sample with paired observations on the proxy and its corresponding target variable
- Approach avoids restrictive assumptions about consistency or convergence rates of the ML procedure
- Proxy viewed as a linking mechanism between datasets rather than a direct substitute for the latent target variable
- Development of sharp identification strategy based on unconditional optimal transport characterization
- Formulation of an inference procedure to control asymptotic size using analytical critical values without requiring resampling techniques
- Demonstrated through Monte Carlo simulations that this approach offers reliable control over size and generates informative confidence sets across various predictive accuracy scenarios
- Framework provides a robust foundation for conducting empirical research with complex data structures by combining data from multiple sources and reframing the role of ML-generated proxies within econometric models
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Locally Robust Inference with Outcomes Predicted by Machine LearningJ. Escanciano, Alejandro Puerta-Cuartas · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Many parameters of interest in economics depend on outcomes generated by machine learning (ML).These generated outcomes are subsequently used in standard econometric estimation and typically treated as observed, a practice that threatens the validity of downstream inference. Empirically relevant cases include dynamic treatment effects under sequential exogeneity, long-term effects with surrogates, the partially linear model with an ML-predicted outcome, productivity persistence with an unrestricted production function and constructed instruments, and outcomes residualized of confounding variation. This paper develops a three-step locally robust GMM framework for valid inference when the depe…
-
Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with InstrumentsVasilis Syrgkanis, Victor Lei, Miruna Oprescu et al. · 2019 · Econometrics · cited 84 times · AI summary available
Abstract
We consider the estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects with arbitrary machine learning methods in the presence of unobserved confounders with the aid of a valid instrument. Such settings arise in A/B tests with an intent-to-treat structure, where the experimenter randomizes over which user will receive a recommendation to take an action, and we are interested in the effect of the downstream action. We develop a statistical learning approach to the estimation of heterogeneous effects, reducing the problem to the minimization of an appropriate loss function that depends on a set of auxiliary models (each corresponding to a separate prediction task). The reduction enables the use of all …
-
Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization ApproachWenshuo Guo, Mingzhang Yin, Yixin Wang et al. · 2022 · Machine Learning · cited 23 times · AI summary available
Abstract
Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates. In practice, measurements of the covariates can often be noisy and/or biased, or only measurements of their proxies may be available. Directly adjusting for these imperfect measurements of the covariates can lead to biased causal estimates. Moreover, without additional assumptions, the causal effects are not point-identifiable due to the noise in these measurements. To this end, we study the partial identification of causal effects given noisy covariates, under a user-specified assumption on the noise level. The key observation is that we can formulate the identification of the average treatm…
-
Functional Estimation under Proxy-Based Full-Law IdentificationHelen Guo, AmirEmad Ghassami, I. Shpitser et al. · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
We state general conditions under which the full-data law is identified in the presence of latent variables, leveraging key observed variables ("proxies") associated with unobserved variables. These assumptions extend those used in existing examples from the literature that recover the full-data law under relatively flexible model assumptions. We first describe graphical models compatible with our assumptions, and then consider target parameters that are functionals of the full-data law, developing estimating equations that give rise to consistent M-estimators using the observed data. Our approach replaces unobserved random variables appearing in full-data estimating equations with observed …
-
Proximal causal inference through cross-proxy balancingGrace V. Ringlein, T. Nguyen, Elizabeth A. Stuart et al. · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Proximal causal inference identifies causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding by drawing on two sets of proxy variables. Identification typically utilizes bridge functions, defined as solutions to integral equations. However, the mechanism by which fitted bridge functions correct for confounding bias remains opaque, offering little to interpret, inspect or stress-test. We show that the defining equation of a treatment bridge function is already a balance condition, with a cross-proxy form: the weights are functions of the treatment confounding proxies and covariates, and they balance the outcome confounding proxies and covariates (i.e., reweighting the distribution in a parti…
-
Pro-Active InferenceSkyler Wu, Yash Nair, Antoine Maechler et al. · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Estimating a population mean is fundamental across scientific applications, but observing every outcome can be prohibitively expensive. Often, covariates and machine learning (ML) predictions are available for the full population, even when only a small subset of outcomes can be observed. How can we leverage this information to proactively select observations to label, update ML predictions as labels arrive, and construct statistically valid confidence intervals? We develop a general, without-replacement formulation of Pro-Active Inference (PAI), extending our earlier with-replacement approach and building on Active Statistical Inference. Rather than making fixed-order label-skip decisions, …
-
Covariate Selection for Doubly Robust Double/debiased Machine Learning Estimators for Causal InferenceMuwon Kwon, Peter M. Steiner · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
High-dimensional data create challenges for causal effect estimation because identifying the covariates needed for correct model specification becomes increasingly difficult. Double/debiased machine learning (DML) facilitates the use of machine learning (ML) for causal inference by mitigating regularization and overfitting bias, but comparatively less attention has been given to covariate selection in relation to the double robustness (DR) property possessed by some DML estimators. In particular, ML-based covariate selection may result in differential covariate selection or in misspecification of both models, thereby limiting the practical utility of the DR property. To address these issues,…
-
ProximalFM: Amortized Proximal Causal Inference under Hidden ConfoundingChristoph Müller, Ayub Kharel, Alex Luedtke et al. · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Standard causal identification methods often assume no unmeasured confounding and can fail when relevant confounders are unobserved. Proximal causal inference instead uses proxy variables to identify effects under hidden confounding. However, nonparametric proximal estimation can be challenging in practice: recovering causal estimands such as the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) requires solving an ill-posed integral equation that is data-hungry, hyperparameter-sensitive, and optimization-unstable. Bayesian inference for such models provides a desirable alternative, mitigating these difficulties by regularizing through the prior. However, computing a posterior is itself challengin…
Papers that cite it
-
Coarsening Latent-Class Probabilities: Directional Distortion and Coverage LossM. T. Kurbucz · 2026 · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Outcomes are regressed on a calibrated probability vector for unobserved class membership. Under a structural conditional mean excluding the score and conditional calibration, the observed-data model reduces to a partially linear regression. The probability vector is a Berkson-type surrogate for membership, so the effect vector $\tau$ is identified without attenuation. In practice the vector is often coarsened to a hard label - an argmax, a confidence threshold - and that label need not retain the Berkson property. For any coarsening the plug-in estimator converges to $\mathcal{A}\tau$, where $\mathcal{A}-I$ is determined by the regression of the discarded part of the score on the retained p…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
Updated on 31 October 2026.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.