Magicoder: Source Code Is All You Need

Authors: Yuxiang Wei, Zhe Wang, Jiawei Liu, Yifeng Ding, Lingming Zhang

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.02120v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper introduces Magicoder, a series of fully open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) for code that aim to close the gap with top code models. These models have no more than 7B parameters and are trained on 75K synthetic instruction data using OSS-Instruct, a novel approach that incorporates open-source code snippets to generate high-quality instruction data for code. The main motivation behind this work is to address the inherent bias in synthetic data generated by LLMs by providing them with a wealth of open-source references, resulting in more diverse, realistic, and controllable data. The authors highlight the orthogonality of OSS-Instruct and other data generation methods like Evol-Instruct, which enables the development of an enhanced version called MagicoderS. Both Magicoder and MagicoderS outperform state-of-the-art code models with similar or larger sizes across various coding benchmarks. These benchmarks include Python text-to-code generation, multilingual coding, and data science program completion. Notably, MagicoderS based on CodeLlama even surpasses ChatGPT on HumanEval+ in terms of pass@1 score (66.5 vs 65.9). Overall, OSS-Instruct opens up new possibilities for low bias and high quality instruction tuning using abundant open source references. The authors of the paper are Yuxiang Wei, Zhe Wang, Jiawei Liu, Yifeng Ding and Lingming Zhang.
AI-generated keywords: Magicoder LLMs OSS-Instruct CodeLlama HumanEval+

AI-generated Key Points

  • Introduces Magicoder, a series of fully open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) for code
  • Aim to close the gap with top code models
  • Models have no more than 7B parameters and are trained on 75K synthetic instruction data using OSS-Instruct
  • OSS-Instruct incorporates open-source code snippets to generate high-quality instruction data for code
  • Motivation is to address bias in synthetic data generated by LLMs by providing them with open-source references
  • Magicoder and MagicoderS outperform state-of-the-art code models across various coding benchmarks
  • Benchmarks include Python text-to-code generation, multilingual coding, and data science program completion
  • MagicoderS based on CodeLlama surpasses ChatGPT on HumanEval+ in terms of pass@1 score (66.5 vs 65.9)
  • OSS-Instruct enables low bias and high-quality instruction tuning using abundant open source references
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We introduce Magicoder, a series of fully open-source (code, weights, and data) Large Language Models (LLMs) for code that significantly closes the gap with top code models while having no more than 7B parameters. Magicoder models are trained on 75K synthetic instruction data using OSS-Instruct, a novel approach to enlightening LLMs with open-source code snippets to generate high-quality instruction data for code. Our main motivation is to mitigate the inherent bias of the synthetic data generated by LLMs by empowering them with a wealth of open-source references for the production of more diverse, realistic, and controllable data. The orthogonality of OSS-Instruct and other data generation methods like Evol-Instruct further enables us to build an enhanced MagicoderS. Both Magicoder and MagicoderS substantially outperform state-of-the-art code models with similar or even larger sizes on a wide range of coding benchmarks, including Python text-to-code generation, multilingual coding, and data-science program completion. Notably, MagicoderS-CL-7B based on CodeLlama even surpasses the prominent ChatGPT on HumanEval+ (66.5 vs. 65.9 in pass@1). Overall, OSS-Instruct opens a new direction for low-bias and high-quality instruction tuning using abundant open-source references.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Dec. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.