Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understanding

Authors: Kexin Yi, Jiajun Wu, Chuang Gan, Antonio Torralba, Pushmeet Kohli, Joshua B. Tenenbaum

NIPS 2018 (spotlight). The first two authors contributed equally to this work. Project page: http://nsvqa.csail.mit.edu

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1810.02338v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understanding" proposes a novel approach to visual question answering (VQA) by combining deep representation learning for visual recognition and language understanding with symbolic program execution for reasoning. The proposed neural-symbolic VQA system first recovers a structural scene representation from the image and a program trace from the question. It then executes the program on the scene representation to obtain an answer. One of the unique advantages of incorporating symbolic structure as prior knowledge is that executing programs on a symbolic space is more robust to long program traces, allowing the model to solve complex reasoning tasks better. In fact, on the CLEVR dataset, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 99.8%. Additionally, this approach is more data- and memory-efficient compared to existing methods for offline question answering since it performs well after learning on a small number of training data and can encode an image into a compact representation requiring less storage. Another significant advantage is that it offers full transparency to the reasoning process, enabling researchers to interpret and diagnose each execution step. This level of transparency allows for better understanding of how different components contribute to overall performance. Overall, this paper presents a promising new approach to VQA that disentangles reasoning from vision and language understanding through neural-symbolic integration. The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art results while also offering improved efficiency and transparency in its reasoning process, making it an attractive solution for complex visual question answering tasks.
AI-generated keywords: Neural-Symbolic VQA

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper proposes a novel approach to visual question answering (VQA) by combining deep representation learning for visual recognition and language understanding with symbolic program execution for reasoning.
  • The proposed neural-symbolic VQA system recovers a structural scene representation from the image and a program trace from the question, then executes the program on the scene representation to obtain an answer.
  • Incorporating symbolic structure as prior knowledge is more robust to long program traces, allowing the model to solve complex reasoning tasks better.
  • On the CLEVR dataset, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 99.8%.
  • This approach is more data- and memory-efficient compared to existing methods for offline question answering since it performs well after learning on a small number of training data and can encode an image into a compact representation requiring less storage.
  • It offers full transparency to the reasoning process, enabling researchers to interpret and diagnose each execution step.
  • This level of transparency allows for better understanding of how different components contribute to overall performance.
  • Overall, this paper presents a promising new approach to VQA that disentangles reasoning from vision and language understanding through neural-symbolic integration.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We marry two powerful ideas: deep representation learning for visual recognition and language understanding, and symbolic program execution for reasoning. Our neural-symbolic visual question answering (NS-VQA) system first recovers a structural scene representation from the image and a program trace from the question. It then executes the program on the scene representation to obtain an answer. Incorporating symbolic structure as prior knowledge offers three unique advantages. First, executing programs on a symbolic space is more robust to long program traces; our model can solve complex reasoning tasks better, achieving an accuracy of 99.8% on the CLEVR dataset. Second, the model is more data- and memory-efficient: it performs well after learning on a small number of training data; it can also encode an image into a compact representation, requiring less storage than existing methods for offline question answering. Third, symbolic program execution offers full transparency to the reasoning process; we are thus able to interpret and diagnose each execution step.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Oct. 2018

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.