Main sequence of star forming galaxies beyond the Herschel confusion limit

Authors: W. J. Pearson, L. Wang, P. D. Hurley, K. Małek, V. Buat, D. Burgarella, D. Farrah, S. J. Oliver, D. J. B. Smith, F. F. S. van der Tak

arXiv: 1804.03482v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
15 pages, 14 figures, 3 tables, 3 appendices, accepted for publication in A&A

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1804.03482v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This study focuses on the main sequence (MS) of star-forming galaxies in deep far-infrared (FIR) cosmological surveys. These surveys are often affected by source confusion, which makes it challenging to examine the properties of individual galaxies accurately. To address this limitation, the authors of this study utilize the latest de-blended Herschel photometry, which reaches approximately 10 times deeper than the 5σ confusion limit in SPIRE. This enables more reliable measurements of star formation rates (SFRs), especially for fainter galaxies, and consequently a more accurate determination of the MS. The researchers develop a pipeline that combines the spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling and fitting tool CIGALE with the de-blending tool XID+. They generate flux density priors in the Herschel SPIRE bands using CIGALE and then use XID+ to extract flux densities from SPIRE maps. By combining these extracted flux densities with multi-wavelength data, they constrain SEDs and derive stellar mass (M*) and SFRs. Using these M* and SFR values, they populate the SFR-M* plane over a redshift range of 0.2 ≤ z < 6.0. The analysis reveals no significant evidence of a high-mass turn-over in the MS. Instead, they find that a simple two-parameter power law model best fits their data: log(SFR) = α[log(M*) - 10.5] + β.
AI-generated keywords: Star-forming galaxies

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on the main sequence (MS) of star-forming galaxies in deep far-infrared (FIR) cosmological surveys
  • Source confusion is a challenge in accurately examining individual galaxy properties
  • Latest de-blended Herschel photometry used to address source confusion limitation
  • De-blending tool XID+ and SED modeling tool CIGALE combined to generate flux density priors and extract flux densities from SPIRE maps
  • SEDs, stellar mass (M*), and star formation rates (SFRs) derived using extracted flux densities and multi-wavelength data
  • SFR-M* plane populated over redshift range of 0.2 ≤ z < 6.0
  • No significant evidence of high-mass turn-over in the MS found
  • Simple two-parameter power law model best fits the data: log(SFR) = α[log(M*) - 10.5] + β
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Deep far-infrared (FIR) cosmological surveys are known to be affected by source confusion, causing issues when examining the main sequence (MS) of star forming galaxies. This has typically been partially tackled by the use of stacking. However, stacking only provides the average properties of the objects in the stack. This work aims to trace the MS over $0.2\leq z<6.0$ using the latest de-blended Herschel photometry, which reaches $\approx10$ times deeper than the 5$\sigma$ confusion limit in SPIRE. This provides more reliable star formation rates (SFRs), especially for the fainter galaxies, and hence a more reliable MS. We built a pipeline that uses the spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling and fitting tool CIGALE to generate flux density priors in the Herschel SPIRE bands. These priors were then fed into the de-blending tool XID+ to extract flux densities from the SPIRE maps. Multi-wavelength data were combined with the extracted SPIRE flux densities to constrain SEDs and provide stellar mass (M$_{\star}$) and SFRs. These M$_{\star}$ and SFRs were then used to populate the SFR-M$_{\star}$ plane over $0.2\leq z<6.0$. No significant evidence of a high-mass turn-over was found; the best fit is thus a simple two-parameter power law of the form log(SFR)$=\alpha[$log(M$_{\star})-10.5]+\beta$. The normalisation of the power law increases with redshift, rapidly at $z\lesssim1.8$, from $0.58\pm0.09$ at $z\approx0.37$ to $1.31\pm0.08$ at $z\approx1.8$. The slope is also found to increase with redshift, perhaps with an excess around $1.8\leq z<2.9$. The increasing slope indicates that galaxies become more self-similar as redshift increases, implying that the specific SFR of high-mass galaxies increases over $z=0.2$ to $z=6.0$, becoming closer to that of low-mass galaxies. The excess in the slope at $1.8\leq z<2.9$, if present, coincides with the peak of the cosmic star formation history.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Apr. 2018

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.