AI summary · arXiv: 2310.01558v1 · cs.CL

Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context

Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan Berant
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 02 Oct. 2023 License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) in Natural Language Processing are effective in creating factual, efficient, and up-to-date systems.
  • The key challenge for RALMs is to ensure that retrieved information enhances model performance when relevant and does not hinder it when irrelevant, especially in scenarios requiring multi-hop reasoning.
  • Recent studies have shown instances where retrieval augmentation can decrease performance, leading to errors cascading through the system.
  • Two methods were proposed to address this challenge: a baseline approach filtering out irrelevant passages using a natural language inference (NLI) model, and a novel approach generating training data for fine-tuning language models with both relevant and irrelevant contexts.
  • Empirical results demonstrated that training models on just 1,000 examples could help them handle irrelevant contexts robustly while maintaining high performance on relevant ones.
  • Efforts were made towards developing Large Language Models (LLMs) with controllable memory capabilities to ignore irrelevant context by training on smaller sets of questions and automatically generated data.
  • Simple NLI models were found effective in increasing robustness against irrelevant context at the cost of discarding some relevant passages when training data is limited.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Processing

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In the field of Natural Language Processing, retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) have shown promise in creating systems that are factual, efficient, and up-to-date. The key challenge for RALMs is to ensure that retrieved information enhances model performance when relevant and does not hinder it when irrelevant. This becomes crucial in scenarios requiring multi-hop reasoning, where the misuse of irrelevant evidence can lead to errors cascading through the system. Recent studies have highlighted instances where retrieval augmentation can actually decrease performance. In response to this issue, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on five open-domain question answering benchmarks to identify cases where retrieval negatively impacts accuracy. Two methods were proposed to address this challenge: firstly, a baseline approach that filters out retrieved passages not supported by question-answer pairs according to a natural language inference (NLI) model. While effective in preventing performance reduction, this method also risks discarding relevant passages. To overcome this limitation, a novel approach was introduced to automatically generate training data for fine-tuning language models to effectively utilize retrieved passages by exposing them to a mix of relevant and irrelevant contexts during training. Empirical results demonstrated that even with just 1,000 examples, the model could be trained to handle irrelevant contexts robustly while maintaining high performance on relevant ones. Additionally, efforts were made towards developing Large Language Models (LLMs) with controllable memory capabilities that enable them to ignore irrelevant context. Unlike previous approaches which relied on over 200K training examples, the focus here was on training with a smaller set of questions and automatically generated data. The study also emphasized multi-hop question-answering settings where retrievers are utilized multiple times. In conclusion, the research highlighted the importance of making RALMs robust against irrelevant retrieved context to enhance overall performance in various tasks. Simple NLI models were found effective in increasing robustness at the cost of discarding some relevant passages when training data is limited. By training models on as few as 1,000 examples and exposing them to diverse contexts during training, significant improvements in handling irrelevant information were observed while maintaining high performance levels overall.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 1 free rewrite left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero Zotero guide
Citation alerts More than 300 papers already cite it: be emailed each new one. Citation alerts guide
Who works on it?

Among the 31 papers around this one, the name that comes back most: Seong-Il Park (2 papers)

2 more people sign several of them. The full map adds their institutions and approaches, from the papers of the last years.

Continue with Google Create a free account: your first map is free
Weekly letter The latest letter of its field, "Artificial intelligence this week" of 9 November 2026: Artificial intelligence this week: When better scores miss the point · Receive one by email for free

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close Another approach to the problem
    Enhancing Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with In-Context Learning
    Seong-Il Park, Seungwoo Choi, Na-Hyun Kim et al. · 2024 · KNOWLEDGENLP · cited 9 times · Not summarized yet

    Enhancing Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with In-Context Learning uses MRC demonstrations to improve robustness to unanswerable and conflicting retrieved contexts.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (RALMs) have significantly improved performance in open-domain question answering (QA) by leveraging external knowledge. However, RALMs still struggle with unanswerable queries, where the retrieved contexts do not contain the correct answer, and with conflicting information, where different sources provide contradictory answers due to imperfect retrieval. This study introduces an in-context learning-based approach to enhance the reasoning capabilities of RALMs, making them more robust in imperfect retrieval scenarios. Our method incorporates Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) demonstrations, referred to as \textit{cases}, to boost the model’s capabilities…

  2. Very close Builds on this paper Cites this paper
    Toward Robust RALMs: Revealing the Impact of Imperfect Retrieval on Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
    Seong-Il Park, Jay-Yoon Lee · 2024 · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · cited 3 times · Not summarized yet

    Toward Robust RALMs investigates unanswerable, adversarial, and conflicting retrieval scenarios, extending analysis of how imperfect evidence affects RALM performance.

    Abstract

    Abstract Retrieval Augmented Language Models (RALMs) have gained significant attention for their ability to generate accurate answers and improve efficiency. However, RALMs are inherently vulnerable to imperfect information due to their reliance on the imperfect retriever or knowledge source. We identify three common scenarios—unanswerable, adversarial, conflicting—where retrieved document sets can confuse RALMs with plausible real-world examples. We present the first comprehensive investigation to assess how well RALMs detect and handle such problematic scenarios. Among these scenarios, to systematically examine adversarial robustness we propose a new adversarial attack method, Generative m…

  3. Very close Groundwork for this paper Cited by this paper A method it uses
    In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
    Ori Ram, Yoav Levine, Itay Dalmedigos et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · cited 1,190 times · AI summary available

    In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Models conditions an unchanged language model on retrieved documents, an approach used as a foundation for retrieval-augmented systems.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-Augmented Language Modeling (RALM) methods, that condition a language model (LM) on relevant documents from a grounding corpus during generation, have been shown to significantly improve language modeling while also providing a natural source attribution mechanism. Existing RALM approaches focus on modifying the LM architecture in order to facilitate the incorporation of external information, significantly complicating deployment. This paper proposes an under-explored alternative, which we dub In-Context RALM: leaving the LM architecture unchanged and prepending grounding documents to the input. We show that in-context RALM which uses off-the-shelf general purpose retrievers provid…

  4. Very close Builds on this paper Cites this paper
    Where Does Robustness Live? Neuron-Guided Adaptation for Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
    Jae Lee, Jaemin Kim, Sumyeong Ahn et al. · 2026 · Not summarized yet

    Where Does Robustness Live? separates abstention from evidence extraction and uses neuron-guided tuning to address noisy or irrelevant contexts.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (RALMs) have shown strong potential in knowledge-intensive tasks, yet they remain vulnerable when retrieved contexts are noisy or irrelevant. Robustness against such contexts requires two distinct capabilities: abstention when contexts are uninformative, and selective extraction when relevant evidence is buried in noise. Yet existing methods face two key limitations: they do not train separately for these two capabilities, and they adapt the model at a coarse layer- or module-level granularity, overlooking that only a small subset of neurons is strongly activated for a given input. We propose NeuRIT, a Neuron-guided Robust Instruction-Tuning framework buil…

  5. Very close Another approach to the problem
    Improving Retrieval Augmented Language Model with Self-Reasoning
    Yuan Xia, Jingbo Zhou, Zhenhui Shi et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · cited 53 times · AI summary available

    Improving Retrieval Augmented Language Model with Self-Reasoning targets performance losses from irrelevant documents using a self-reasoning framework.

    Abstract

    The Retrieval-Augmented Language Model (RALM) has shown remarkable performance on knowledge-intensive tasks by incorporating external knowledge during inference, which mitigates the factual hallucinations inherited in large language models (LLMs). Despite these advancements, challenges persist in the implementation of RALMs, particularly concerning their reliability and traceability. To be specific, the irrelevant document retrieval may result in unhelpful response generation or even deteriorate the performance of LLMs, while the lack of proper citations in generated outputs complicates efforts to verify the trustworthiness of the models. To this end, we propose a novel self-reasoning framew…

  6. Very close Another approach to the problem
    Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
    Wenhao Yu, Hongming Zhang, Xiaoman Pan et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · cited 263 times · AI summary available

    Chain-of-Note addresses misleading retrieved data by helping RALMs assess available knowledge and avoid overlooking what they already know.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) represent a substantial advancement in the capabilities of large language models, notably in reducing factual hallucination by leveraging external knowledge sources. However, the reliability of the retrieved information is not always guaranteed. The retrieval of irrelevant data can lead to misguided responses, and potentially causing the model to overlook its inherent knowledge, even when it possesses adequate information to address the query. Moreover, standard RALMs often struggle to assess whether they possess adequate knowledge, both intrinsic and retrieved, to provide an accurate answer. In situations where knowledge is lacking, these systems …

  7. Very close Same question
    Unraveling and Mitigating Retriever Inconsistencies in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
    Ming-Da Li, Xin-Yu Li, Yifan Chen et al. · 2024 · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet

    Unraveling and Mitigating Retriever Inconsistencies studies why retrieval can reduce RALM accuracy, including reader degeneration and differences among knowledge sources.

    Abstract

    Although Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models (RALMs) demonstrate their superiority in terms of factuality, they do not consistently outperform the original retrieval-free Language Models (LMs). Our experiments reveal that this example-level performance inconsistency exists not only between retrieval-augmented and retrieval-free LM but also among different retrievers. To understand this phenomenon, we investigate the degeneration behavior of RALMs and theoretically decompose it into four categories. Further analysis based on our decomposition reveals that the innate difference in knowledge sources and the unpredictable degeneration of the reader model contribute most to the inconsistenc…

  8. Very close Same question Cites this paper
    Evaluating the Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models
    Shuyang Cao, Karthik Radhakrishnan, David S. Rosenberg et al. · 2025 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 4 times · Not summarized yet

    Evaluating the Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models tests when retrieval harms performance and how document quantity and order affect RAG results.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) generally enhances large language models'(LLMs) ability to solve knowledge-intensive tasks. But RAG could also lead to performance degradation due to imperfect retrieval and the model's limited ability to leverage retrieved content. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of LLMs in practical RAG setups (henceforth retrieval robustness). We focus on three research questions: (1) whether RAG is always better than non-RAG; (2) whether more retrieved documents always lead to better performance; and (3) whether document order impacts results. To facilitate this study, we establish a benchmark of 1,891 samples spanning five datasets across three task categori…

Prior work it builds on

  1. Close Groundwork for this paper Used in depth by this paper A method it uses
    ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT
    O. Khattab, M. Zaharia · 2020 · Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · cited 2,804 times · AI summary available

    ColBERT presents an efficient passage-ranking method that can supply retrieved documents to retrieval-augmented language models.

    Abstract

    Recent progress in Natural Language Understanding (NLU) is driving fast-paced advances in Information Retrieval (IR), largely owed to fine-tuning deep language models (LMs) for document ranking. While remarkably effective, the ranking models based on these LMs increase computational cost by orders of magnitude over prior approaches, particularly as they must feed each query-document pair through a massive neural network to compute a single relevance score. To tackle this, we present ColBERT, a novel ranking model that adapts deep LMs (in particular, BERT) for efficient retrieval. ColBERT introduces a late interaction architecture that independently encodes the query and the document using BE…

  2. Very close Broader context
    Long-range Language Modeling with Self-retrieval
    Ohad Rubin, Jonathan Berant · 2023 · Computation and Language · cited 34 times · AI summary available

    Long-range Language Modeling with Self-retrieval trains a retrieval-augmented transformer to retrieve earlier text chunks for long-document language modeling.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-augmented language models (LMs) have received much attention recently. However, typically the retriever is not trained jointly as a native component of the LM, but added to an already-pretrained LM, which limits the ability of the LM and the retriever to adapt to one another. In this work, we propose the Retrieval-Pretrained Transformer (RPT), an architecture and training procedure for jointly training a retrieval-augmented LM from scratch for the task of modeling long texts. Given a recently generated text chunk in a long document, the LM computes query representations, which are then used to retrieve earlier chunks in the document, located potentially tens of thousands of tokens …

  3. Close Broader context A method it uses
    Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
    Zhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · cited 953 times · AI summary available

    Active Retrieval Augmented Generation retrieves information repeatedly during long-form generation rather than using a single retrieval step.

    Abstract

    Despite the remarkable ability of large language models (LMs) to comprehend and generate language, they have a tendency to hallucinate and create factually inaccurate output. Augmenting LMs by retrieving information from external knowledge resources is one promising solution. Most existing retrieval-augmented LMs employ a retrieve-and-generate setup that only retrieves information once based on the input. This is limiting, however, in more general scenarios involving generation of long texts, where continually gathering information throughout the generation process is essential. There have been some past efforts to retrieve information multiple times while generating outputs, which mostly re…

  4. Close Groundwork for this paper
    REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training
    Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung et al. · 2020 · International Conference on Machine Learning · cited 3,602 times · Not summarized yet

    REALM introduces a latent knowledge retriever in language-model pretraining, fine-tuning, and inference.

    Abstract

    Language model pre-training has been shown to capture a surprising amount of world knowledge, crucial for NLP tasks such as question answering. However, this knowledge is stored implicitly in the parameters of a neural network, requiring ever-larger networks to cover more facts. To capture knowledge in a more modular and interpretable way, we augment language model pre-training with a latent knowledge retriever, which allows the model to retrieve and attend over documents from a large corpus such as Wikipedia, used during pre-training, fine-tuning and inference. For the first time, we show how to pre-train such a knowledge retriever in an unsupervised manner, using masked language modeling a…

  5. Close Groundwork for this paper
    Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks
    Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus et al. · 2020 · Computation and Language · cited 20,501 times · AI summary available

    Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks uses external non-parametric memory to support language models on knowledge-intensive tasks.

    Abstract

    Large pre-trained language models have been shown to store factual knowledge in their parameters, and achieve state-of-the-art results when fine-tuned on downstream NLP tasks. However, their ability to access and precisely manipulate knowledge is still limited, and hence on knowledge-intensive tasks, their performance lags behind task-specific architectures. Additionally, providing provenance for their decisions and updating their world knowledge remain open research problems. Pre-trained models with a differentiable access mechanism to explicit non-parametric memory can overcome this issue, but have so far been only investigated for extractive downstream tasks. We explore a general-purpose …

Papers that cite it

  1. Very close Builds on this paper Uses this paper in depth
    Influence Guided Context Selection for Effective Retrieval-Augmented Generation
    Jia-Le Deng, Yan-Yan Shen, Ziyuan Pei et al. · 2025 · Neural Information Processing Systems · cited 11 times · Not summarized yet

    Influence Guided Context Selection assesses retrieved-context quality using the query, context list, and generator to address noisy or irrelevant evidence.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses large language model (LLM) hallucinations by grounding responses in external knowledge, but its effectiveness is compromised by poor-quality retrieved contexts containing irrelevant or noisy information. While existing approaches attempt to improve performance through context selection based on predefined context quality assessment metrics, they show limited gains over standard RAG. We attribute this limitation to their failure in holistically utilizing available information (query, context list, and generator) for comprehensive quality assessment. Inspired by recent advances in data selection, we reconceptualize context quality assessment as an…

  2. Close Broader context Uses this paper in depth
    Stable-RAG: Mitigating Retrieval-Permutation-Induced Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
    Qianchi Zhang, Hainan Zhang, Liang Pang et al. · 2026 · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · cited 8 times · Not summarized yet

    Stable-RAG studies how permutations of retrieved documents affect answers, focusing on order sensitivity rather than irrelevant-context robustness.

    Abstract

    Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a key paradigm for reducing factual hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet little is known about how the order of retrieved documents affects model behavior. We empirically show that under a Top-5 retrieval setting with the gold document included, LLM answers vary substantially across permutations of the retrieved set, even when the gold document is fixed in the first position. This reveals a previously underexplored sensitivity to retrieval permutations. Although existing robust RAG methods focus primarily on enhancing LLM robustness to low-quality retrieval and mitigating positional bias to distribute attention fairly over long c…

  3. Very close Broader context
    Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level
    Sezen Perçin, Xin Su, Syed Sha Qutub et al. · 2025 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 14 times · Not summarized yet

    Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level examines how query perturbations affect retrieval and downstream RAG performance.

    Abstract

    Large language models (LLMs) are very costly and inefficient to update with new information. To address this limitation, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been proposed as a solution that dynamically incorporates external knowledge during inference, improving factual consistency and reducing hallucinations. Despite its promise, RAG systems face practical challenges-most notably, a strong dependence on the quality of the input query for accurate retrieval. In this paper, we investigate the sensitivity of different components in the RAG pipeline to various types of query perturbations. Our analysis reveals that the performance of commonly used retrievers can degrade significantly even u…

  4. Close Builds on this paper Uses this paper in depth
    The Distracting Effect: Understanding Irrelevant Passages in RAG
    Chen Amiraz, Florin Cuconasu, Simone Filice et al. · 2025 · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · cited 59 times · Not summarized yet

    The Distracting Effect quantifies how irrelevant passages mislead RAG models and fine-tunes them with selected distractors to improve accuracy.

    Abstract

    A well-known issue with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is that retrieved passages that are irrelevant to the query sometimes distract the answer-generating LLM, causing it to provide an incorrect response. In this paper, we shed light on this core issue and formulate the distracting effect of a passage w.r.t. a query (and an LLM). We provide a quantifiable measure of the distracting effect of a passage and demonstrate its robustness across LLMs. Our research introduces novel methods for identifying and using hard distracting passages to improve RAG systems. By fine-tuning LLMs with these carefully selected distracting passages, we achieve up to a 7.5% increase in answering accuracy com…

  5. Very close Broader context
    Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
    Suyuchen Wang, Jin-Lin Wang, Xin-Yu Wang et al. · 2025 · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · cited 8 times · Not summarized yet

    Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning trains models to integrate in-context evidence during reasoning and answer generation.

    Abstract

    Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with context fidelity, producing inconsistent answers when responding to questions based on provided information. Existing approaches either rely on expensive supervised fine-tuning to generate evidence post-answer or train models to perform web searches without necessarily improving utilization of the given context. We propose CARE, a novel native retrieval-augmented reasoning framework that teaches LLMs to explicitly integrate in-context evidence within their reasoning process with the model's own retrieval capabilities. Our method requires limited labeled evidence data while significantly enhancing both retrieval accuracy and answer generation p…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

Updated on 3 November 2026.

The illustrated guide to the papers around a paper

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.