AI summary · arXiv: 2012.12348v3 · math.NA

An overview on deep learning-based approximation methods for partial differential equations

Christian Beck, Martin Hutzenthaler, Arnulf Jentzen, Benno Kuckuck
Original paper · DOI 10.3934/dcdsb.2022238 Submitted to arXiv on 22 Dec. 2020 Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 28 (2023), no. 6, 3697-3746 49 pages. Compared to the first version, the manuscript has been significantly expanded. In particular, Python source code implementing several of the presented methods using PyTorch, as well as numerical simulations have been added License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • The field of approximating high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) using deep learning-based methods has gained significant attention in applied mathematics.
  • Deep learning algorithms have been proposed and tested numerically on various examples of high-dimensional PDEs.
  • Monte Carlo methods are often used with deep learning techniques to improve accuracy and efficiency.
  • The article provides an introduction to this emerging field, revisiting mathematical results and presenting proofs.
  • It offers a comprehensive overview of recent literature and advancements made by different researchers.
  • Python source code implementing several methods using PyTorch is included in the expanded version of the article.
  • Numerical simulations demonstrate the effectiveness and performance of these deep learning-based approximation techniques.
  • The article serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in utilizing deep learning approaches for approximating high-dimensional PDEs.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning Approximation PDEs PyTorch Numerical Simulations

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The field of approximating high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) using deep learning-based methods has gained significant attention in applied mathematics. This challenging problem involves finding approximate solutions to PDEs in high-dimensional spaces, which has traditionally been a difficult task. In recent years, several deep learning-based approximation algorithms have been proposed and tested numerically on various examples of high-dimensional PDEs. These algorithms utilize the power of deep neural networks to learn and approximate the underlying PDEs. Additionally, Monte Carlo methods are often employed in conjunction with deep learning techniques to further enhance the accuracy and efficiency of the approximation process. This article provides an introduction to this emerging field of research by revisiting selected mathematical results related to deep learning approximation methods for PDEs. The authors review the main ideas behind these methods and present their proofs. Moreover, they offer a comprehensive overview of the recent literature in this area, highlighting the advancements made by different researchers. The expanded version of this article includes Python source code that implements several of the presented methods using PyTorch. This allows readers to gain practical insights into how these algorithms can be implemented and applied in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, numerical simulations are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and performance of these deep learning-based approximation techniques. Overall, this article serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in utilizing deep learning approaches for approximating high-dimensional PDEs. It not only presents theoretical foundations but also offers practical guidance through code implementations and numerical experiments. By combining insights from both mathematics and machine learning, this research contributes to advancing our understanding and capabilities in solving complex PDE problems using deep learning techniques.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Related
    About optimal loss function for training physics-informed neural networks under respecting causality
    Vasiliy A. Es'kin, Danil V. Davydov, Ekaterina D. Egorova et al. · 2023 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    A method is presented that allows to reduce a problem described by differential equations with initial and boundary conditions to the problem described only by differential equations. The advantage of using the modified problem for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) methodology is that it becomes possible to represent the loss function in the form of a single term associated with differential equations, thus eliminating the need to tune the scaling coefficients for the terms related to boundary and initial conditions. The weighted loss functions respecting causality were modified and new weighted loss functions based on generalized functions are derived. Numerical experiments have been…

  2. Related
    DelayDiffEq: Generating Delay Differential Equation Solvers via Recursive Embedding of Ordinary Differential Equation Solvers
    David Widmann, Chris Rackauckas · 2022 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Traditional solvers for delay differential equations (DDEs) are designed around only a single method and do not effectively use the infrastructure of their more-developed ordinary differential equation (ODE) counterparts. In this work we present DelayDiffEq, a Julia package for numerically solving delay differential equations (DDEs) which leverages the multitude of numerical algorithms in OrdinaryDiffEq for solving both stiff and non-stiff ODEs, and manages to solve challenging stiff DDEs. We describe how compiling the ODE integrator within itself, and accounting for discontinuity propagation, leads to a design that is effective for DDEs while using all of the ODE internals. We highlight som…

  3. Related
    Compatible finite element methods for geophysical fluid dynamics
    Colin J. Cotter · 2023 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This article surveys research on the application of compatible finite element methods to large scale atmosphere and ocean simulation. Compatible finite element methods extend Arakawa's C-grid finite difference scheme to the finite element world. They are constructed from a discrete de Rham complex, which is a sequence of finite element spaces which are linked by the operators of differential calculus. The use of discrete de Rham complexes to solve partial differential equations is well established, but in this article we focus on the specifics of dynamical cores for simulating weather, oceans and climate. The most important consequence of the discrete de Rham complex is the Hodge-Helmholtz d…

  4. Related
    A robust solution strategy for the Cahn-Larché equations
    Erlend Storvik, Jakub Wiktor Both, Jan Martin Nordbotten et al. · 2022 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    In this paper we propose a solution strategy for the Cahn-Larch\'e equations, which is a model for linearized elasticity in a medium with two elastic phases that evolve subject to a Ginzburg-Landau type energy functional. The system can be seen as a combination of the Cahn-Hilliard regularized interface equation and linearized elasticity, and is non-linearly coupled, has a fourth order term that comes from the Cahn-Hilliard subsystem, and is non-convex and nonlinear in both the phase-field and displacement variables. We propose a novel semi-implicit discretization in time that uses a standard convex-concave splitting method of the nonlinear double-well potential, as well as special treatment…

  5. Related
    Provably stable numerical method for the anisotropic diffusion equation in toroidally confined magnetic fields
    Dean Muir, Kenneth Duru, Matthew Hole et al. · 2023 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We present a novel numerical method for solving the anisotropic diffusion equation in toroidally confined magnetic fields which is efficient, accurate and provably stable. The continuous problem is written in terms of a derivative operator for the perpendicular transport and a linear operator, obtained through field line tracing, for the parallel transport. We derive energy estimates of the solution of the continuous initial boundary value problem. A discrete formulation is presented using operator splitting in time with the summation by parts finite difference approximation of spatial derivatives for the perpendicular diffusion operator. Weak penalty procedures are derived for implementing …

  6. Related
    Solving Backward Doubly Stochastic Differential Equations through Splitting Schemes
    Feng Bao, Yanzhao Cao, He Zhang · 2021 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    A splitting scheme for backward doubly stochastic differential equations is proposed. The main idea is to decompose a backward doubly stochastic differential equation into a backward stochastic differential equation and a stochastic differential equation. The backward stochastic differential equation and the stochastic differential equation are then approximated by first order finite difference schemes, which results in a first order scheme for the backward doubly stochastic differential equation. Numerical experiments are conducted to illustrate the convergence rate of the proposed scheme.

  7. Related
    The mpEDMD Algorithm for Data-Driven Computations of Measure-Preserving Dynamical Systems
    Matthew J. Colbrook · 2022 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Koopman operators globally linearize nonlinear dynamical systems and their spectral information is a powerful tool for the analysis and decomposition of nonlinear dynamical systems. However, Koopman operators are infinite-dimensional, and computing their spectral information is a considerable challenge. We introduce measure-preserving extended dynamic mode decomposition ($\texttt{mpEDMD}$), the first truncation method whose eigendecomposition converges to the spectral quantities of Koopman operators for general measure-preserving dynamical systems. $\texttt{mpEDMD}$ is a data-driven algorithm based on an orthogonal Procrustes problem that enforces measure-preserving truncations of Koopman op…

  8. Related
    Thirty years of the finite volume method for solid mechanics
    Philip Cardiff, Ismet Demirdžić · 2018 · Numerical Analysis · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Since early publications in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the finite volume method has been shown suitable for solid mechanics analyses. At present, there are several flavours of the method, which can be classified in a variety of ways, such as grid arrangement (cell-centred vs staggered vs vertex-centred), solution algorithm (implicit vs explicit), and stabilisation strategy (Rhie-Chow vs Jameson-Schmidt-Turkel vs Godunov upwinding). This article gives an overview, historical perspective, comparison and critical analysis of the different approaches where a close comparison with the de facto standard for computational solid mechanics, the finite element method, is given. The article finish…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.