ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

1. Very close Cites this paper Uses this paper in depth Not relevant

   BioLabAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Idea Generation and Evaluation on Biomedical Research Trajectories

   Yan Li, Wuyang Lan, Changwei Ji et al. · 2025 · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Advancing biomedical discovery demands creative, well grounded research ideas, yet early stage ideation remains slow, resource-intensive, and uncertain. Recent large language model (LLM) systems show promise for idea generation, but their outputs are rarely evaluated for their potential to meaningfully advance research trajectories. Here we present BioLabAgents, a multi-agent framework that emulates collaborative research for scientific idea generation, where specialized LLM agents iteratively propose, critique, and refine research problems, methods, and experimental designs from a single seed publication. To assess the plausibility and forward-driving value of generated scientific ideas, we…

2. Very close Cited by this paper Cites this paper Used in depth by this paper Not relevant

   Chain of Ideas: Revolutionizing Research Via Novel Idea Development with LLM Agents

   Long Li, Wei-Wen Xu, Jiayan Guo et al. · 2024 · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · cited 133 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Effective research ideation is a critical step for scientific research. However, the exponential increase in scientific literature makes it challenging for researchers to stay current with recent advances and identify meaningful research directions. Recent developments in large language models~(LLMs) suggest a promising avenue for automating the generation of novel research ideas. However, existing methods for idea generation either trivially prompt LLMs or directly expose LLMs to extensive literature without indicating useful information. Inspired by the research process of human researchers, we propose a Chain-of-Ideas~(CoI) agent, an LLM-based agent that organizes relevant literature in a…

3. Very close Not relevant

   GraphingAgent: An Agentic RAG Framework for Automated Knowledge Discovery in Scientific Literature

   Nivedha Raut, Rupali V. Pashte · 2025 · 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computation-Based Sensor Application (ICAIQSA) · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   The exponential growth of research articles has made it increasingly difficult for researchers to manually search and mine relevant problems. Traditional search mechanisms often fail to capture contextual nuances, leading to information overload. This paper proposes an automated framework that leverages large language models (LLMs), prompt engineering, and vector databases to efficiently mine and graph research problems. By integrating a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) ecosystem with catered prompts and a retrieval chain, the system provides structured access to research problem statements in an open-access environment. Experimental implementation demonstrates the potential of this syst…

4. Very close Cites this paper Not relevant

   Deep Ideation: Designing LLM Agents to Generate Novel Research Ideas on Scientific Concept Network

   Ke-Yu Zhao, Weiquan Lin, Qirui Zheng et al. · 2025 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 8 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Novel research ideas play a critical role in advancing scientific inquiries. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their potential to generate novel research ideas by leveraging large-scale scientific literature. However, previous work in research ideation has primarily relied on simplistic methods, such as keyword co-occurrence or semantic similarity. These approaches focus on identifying statistical associations in the literature but overlook the complex, contextual relationships between scientific concepts, which are essential to effectively leverage knowledge embedded in human literature. For instance, papers that simultaneously mention"keyword A"and"keywo…

5. Very close Not relevant

   Analysis of Accelerating Ideation Process with Large Language Model

   Yuhan Wei · 2024 · Applied and Computational Engineering · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Abstract. Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced, demonstrating near-human intelligence in language comprehension, problem-solving, and autonomous decision-making, which can be leveraged in scientific discovery. Previous research of LLM for science often focuses on experiment execution part and the first stage of research, i.e., idea generation with large language models is lack of research. This paper fills this gap by surveying the use of LLM-based agent systems in research idea generation. This research first proposes three stages in research idea generation pipeline, pre-ideation (knowledge preparation), ideation (generation and iteration), post-ideation (evaluation), and pro…

6. Very close Cites this paper Uses this paper in depth Not relevant

   AI Research Agents Narrow Scientific Exploration

   Yixuan Tang, Yi Yang · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 4 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   AI research agents now support large-scale AI-assisted scientific discovery. We examine whether AI-generated ideas broaden scientific exploration or primarily reinforce existing work. Using five agent frameworks and five large language models, we generate 219,655 ideas for different scientific fields. Across experiments, four consistent patterns emerge. First, AI-generated ideas are more concentrated than human-authored papers within the same research area. Second, they remain much closer to starting literature than later human follow-on work does. Third, AI-generated ideas align less with future human research. Last, AI-generated ideas are located in lower-impact regions of the historical s…

7. Very close Cites this paper Not relevant

   Idea2Story: An Automated Pipeline for Transforming Research Concepts into Complete Scientific Narratives

   T. Xu, Z. Qian, Gao Liu et al. · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 8 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Autonomous scientific discovery with large language model (LLM)-based agents has recently made substantial progress, demonstrating the ability to automate end-to-end research workflows. However, existing systems largely rely on runtime-centric execution paradigms, repeatedly reading, summarizing, and reasoning over large volumes of scientific literature online. This on-the-spot computation strategy incurs high computational cost, suffers from context window limitations, and often leads to brittle reasoning and hallucination. We propose Idea2Story, a pre-computation-driven framework for autonomous scientific discovery that shifts literature understanding from online reasoning to offline knowl…

8. Very close Cited by this paper Not relevant

   The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery

   Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 1,350 times · AI summary available

   Abstract

   One of the grand challenges of artificial general intelligence is developing agents capable of conducting scientific research and discovering new knowledge. While frontier models have already been used as aids to human scientists, e.g. for brainstorming ideas, writing code, or prediction tasks, they still conduct only a small part of the scientific process. This paper presents the first comprehensive framework for fully automatic scientific discovery, enabling frontier large language models to perform research independently and communicate their findings. We introduce The AI Scientist, which generates novel research ideas, writes code, executes experiments, visualizes results, describes its …

Prior work it builds on

1. Close* Not relevant

   Benchmarking Large Language Models As AI Research Agents

   Qian Huang, Jian Vora, Percy Liang et al. · 2023 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 67 times · Not summarized yet
2. Close Not relevant

   Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate

   Yilun Du, Shuang Li, A. Torralba et al. · 2023 · International Conference on Machine Learning · cited 2,570 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in language generation, understanding, and few-shot learning in recent years. An extensive body of work has explored how their performance may be further improved through the tools of prompting, ranging from verification, self-consistency, or intermediate scratchpads. In this paper, we present a complementary approach to improve language responses where multiple language model instances propose and debate their individual responses and reasoning processes over multiple rounds to arrive at a common final answer. Our findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances mathematical and strategic reasoning across a nu…

3. Close Not relevant

   How AI Processing Delays Foster Creativity: Exploring Research Question Co-Creation with an LLM-based Agent

   Yi-Ren Liu, Si Chen, Haocong Cheng et al. · 2023 · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · cited 116 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Developing novel research questions (RQs) often requires extensive literature reviews, especially in interdisciplinary fields. To support RQ development through human-AI co-creation, we leveraged Large Language Models (LLMs) to build an LLM-based agent system named CoQuest. We conducted an experiment with 20 HCI researchers to examine the impact of two interaction designs: breadth-first and depth-first RQ generation. The findings revealed that participants perceived the breadth-first approach as more creative and trustworthy upon task completion. Conversely, during the task, participants considered the depth-first generated RQs as more creative. Additionally, we discovered that AI processing…

4. Related Not relevant

   Large Language Models for Automated Open-domain Scientific Hypotheses Discovery

   Zonglin Yang, Xinya Du, Jun-Xian Li et al. · 2023 · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · cited 144 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Hypothetical induction is recognized as the main reasoning type when scientists make observations about the world and try to propose hypotheses to explain those observations. Past research on hypothetical induction is under a constrained setting: (1) the observation annotations in the dataset are carefully manually handpicked sentences (resulting in a close-domain setting); and (2) the ground truth hypotheses are mostly commonsense knowledge, making the task less challenging. In this work, we tackle these problems by proposing the first dataset for social science academic hypotheses discovery, with the final goal to create systems that automatically generate valid, novel, and helpful scienti…

5. Related Not relevant

   AGATHA: Automatic Graph Mining And Transformer based Hypothesis Generation Approach

   Justin Sybrandt, Ilya Tyagin, M. Shtutman et al. · 2020 · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · cited 55 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Medical research is risky and expensive. Drug discovery requires researchers to efficiently winnow thousands of potential targets to a small candidate set. However, scientists spend significant time and money long before seeing the intermediate results that ultimately determine this smaller set. Hypothesis generation systems address this challenge by mining the wealth of publicly available scientific information to predict plausible research directions. We present AGATHA, a deep-learning hypothesis generation system that learns a data-driven ranking criteria to recommend new biomedical connections. We massively validate our system with a temporal holdout wherein we predict connections first …

Papers that cite it

1. Close Review Uses this paper in depth Not relevant

   Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation

   Steffen Eger, Yong Cao, Jennifer D'Souza et al. · 2025 · Computation and Language · cited 63 times · AI summary available

   Transforming Science with Large Language Models surveys AI tools across scientific discovery, including research-idea generation and automated peer review.

   Abstract

   With the advent of large multimodal language models, science is now at a threshold of an AI-based technological transformation. Recently, a plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently. This includes all aspects of the research cycle, especially (1) searching for relevant literature; (2) generating research ideas and conducting experimentation; generating (3) text-based and (4) multimodal content (e.g., scientific figures and diagrams); and (5) AI-based automatic peer review. In this survey, we provide an in-depth overview over these exciting recent developments, whic…

2. Very close Uses this paper in depth Not relevant

   PaperClaw: Harnessing Agents for Autonomous Research and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement

   Wei Ye, Hang-Chen Liu, Dong-Yuan Li et al. · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Large language models have become capable reasoners and tool users that write and run code and search the literature, which makes automating the research process itself a realistic goal. We present PAPERCLAW, a harnessed multi-agent system that carries a project autonomously, from a field of study to a finished paper. PAPERCLAW curates a domain from a field's live literature, datasets, and code; brainstorms it into an idea with a pre-registered main-result contract; and drives a stoppable hypothesis map through an iterative propose, test, reflect loop that grows only from measured verdicts and halts once the evidence supports the idea, at which point it writes a venue-compliant paper. A full…

3. Close Uses this paper in depth Not relevant

   Graph2Idea:Retrieval-Augmented Scientific Idea Generation with Graph-Structured Contexts

   Xu Li, Hanzhe Tu, Xun Han · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 4 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Generating novel, feasible, and high-quality research ideas is an important yet challenging task in scientific discovery. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods often ground idea generation with retrieved literature, but the retrieved evidence is usually provided as flat text, such as titles, abstracts, or summaries. Such flat contexts may contain redundant or weakly relevant information, while making cross-paper relations among problems, methods, mechanisms, and findings difficult to identify and trace. To address this challenge, we propose Graph2Idea, a knowledge graph-guided framework for retrieval-augmented scientific idea generation.Graph2Idea first retrieves papers according t…

4. Close Uses this paper in depth Not relevant

   EvoGens: A Population-Based Heuristic Search Framework for Scientific Idea Generation

   Xu Li, Hanzhe Tu, Xin-Yi Li et al. · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Generating novel research ideas is fundamental to scientific progress. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in assisting this process, existing approaches often exhibit semantic convergence, resulting in limited diversity and novelty. To address this, we introduce EvoGens, an evolution-inspired framework that recasts scientific idea generation as an evolutionary search over a population of ideas. EvoGens iteratively applies rank-based mutation with differentiated retrieval planning to incorporate external knowledge, and semantic-aware crossover to fuse complementary concepts for conceptual reorganization. A lightweight evaluation signal guides the selection process, encouraging su…

5. Very close Uses this paper in depth Not relevant

   Distill, Debate, Discover: Grounding Multi-Agent Research Ideation in Graph-Distilled Insights

   Qian-Ran Ma, Mu-Xin-Wang-Xu-Zhu-Hai-Biao Liu, Grace Kim et al. · 2026 · Not summarized yet

   Abstract

   Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support research idea generation and scientific discovery. Multi-agent debate offers a collaborative approach to this task by bringing together diverse perspectives to develop research ideas. However, a key challenge is how to equip agents with distinct and meaningful expertise to guide their contributions. Inspired by how researchers draw on accumulated research experience during collaboration, we introduce InsightAgents, a framework that constructs literature-grounded agent expertise by distilling insights from graphs of related papers. Guided by insights that trace evolving research approaches, reveal underlying assumptions, and identi…