AI summary · arXiv: 1604.07422v1 · quant-ph
Single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent
The essentials
- The paper explores the concept of single-world interpretations in quantum theory.
- Single-world interpretation suggests that a measurement can have multiple possible outcomes but only one of them "really" occurs.
- The authors propose a gedankenexperiment to model an experimenter who also uses quantum theory and find that no single-world interpretation can be logically consistent in such a scenario.
- This conclusion extends to deterministic hidden-variable theories like Bohmian mechanics since they also impose a single-world interpretation.
- The findings challenge the traditional understanding of quantum mechanics and suggest that alternative interpretations may need to be considered.
- The paper has been published in Nature Communications.
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Continue with Google Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Single-World Theory of the Extended Wigner’s Friend ExperimentA. Sudbery · 2016 · Foundations of Physics · cited 64 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Frauchiger and Renner have recently claimed to prove that “Single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent”. This is contradicted by a construction due to Bell, inspired by Bohmian mechanics, which shows that any quantum system can be modelled in such a way that there is only one “world” at any time, but the predictions of quantum theory are reproduced. This Bell–Bohmian theory is applied to the experiment proposed by Frauchiger and Renner, and their argument is critically examined. It is concluded that it is their version of “standard quantum theory”, incorporating state vector collapse upon measurement, that is not self-consistent.
-
A one-world interpretation of quantum mechanicsIsaac Layton, Jonathan Oppenheim, Zachary Weller-Davies · 2025 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
The measurement problem is the issue of explaining how the objective classical world emerges from a quantum one. Here we take a different approach. We assume that there is an objective classical system, and then ask that the standard rules of probability theory apply to it when it interacts with a quantum system. Under mild assumptions, we recover the unitary dynamics, collapse and Born rule postulates from quantum theory. Nonetheless, there is no decoherence, because the quantum state remains pure conditioned on the classical trajectory. This results in one world, rather than many-worlds. Our main technical tool is to exploit a change of measure on the space of classical paths, the function…
-
How Quantum Mechanics can consistently describe the use of itselfDustin Lazarovici, Mario Hubert · 2019 · Scientific Reports · cited 109 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
We discuss the no-go theorem of Frauchiger and Renner based on an "extended Wigner's friend" thought experiment which is supposed to show that any single-world interpretation of quantum mechanics leads to inconsistent predictions if it is applicable on all scales. We show that no such inconsistency occurs if one considers a complete description of the physical situation. We then discuss implications of the thought experiment that have not been clearly addressed in the original paper, including a tension between relativity and nonlocal effects predicted by quantum mechanics. Our discussion applies in particular to Bohmian mechanics.
-
Making Mistakes Saves the Single World of the Extended Wigner’s Friend ExperimentSzymon Łukaszyk · 2021 · arXiv: Quantum Physics · preprint, not peer reviewed · Not summarized yet
Abstract
The Extended Wigner’s Friend thought experiment comprising a quantum system containing an agent who draws conclusions, upon observing the outcome of a measurement of a qubit prepared in two non-orthogonal versions by another agent led its authors to conclude that quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. It has also been proposed that this thought experiment is equivalent to coherent entangled state (Bell type) experiments. It is argued in this paper that the assumption of the freedom of choice of the first Wigner’s friend invalidates such equivalency. It is also argued that the assumption of locality (physical space) introduces superfluous identity of indiscernibles met…
-
Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Paradoxical Picture.A. Varshovi · 2020 · arXiv: Quantum Physics · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
Abstract
The many-worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics is studied from an unprecedented ontological perspective based on the reality of (semi-) deterministic parallel worlds in the interpretation. It is demonstrated that with thanks to the uncertainty principle there would be no consistent way to specify the correct ontology of the Universe, hence the MWI is subject to an inherent contradiction which claims that the world where we live in is unreal.
-
Conventional Quantum Theory Does Not Support a Coherent Relational AccountR. Kastner · 2024 · Philosophy of Physics · cited 4 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Quantum theory in its conventional formulation is notoriously subject to various measurement-related paradoxes, as exemplified by the"Schrodinger's Cat"and"Wigner's Friend"thought experiments. It has been shown, for example by Frauchiger and Renner, that nested measurements such as those occurring in the Wigner's Friend experiment can lead to inconsistencies concerning the putative outcomes of measurements. Such inconsistencies are commonly presumed to remain private and incommensurable, but this is not the case. A counterexample, in which the inconsistencies can be revealed among the observers, is reviewed. The implications for a recent attempt to shield Relational Quantum Mechanics from su…
-
Quantum mechanical rules for observed observers and the consistency of quantum theoryA. Polychronakos · 2022 · Nature Communications · cited 13 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
I argue that the rules of unitary quantum mechanics imply that observers who will themselves be subject to measurements in a linear combination of macroscopic states (``cat"measurements) cannot make reliable predictions on the results of experiments performed after such measurements. This lifts the inconsistency in the interpretation of quantum mechanics recently identified by Frauchiger and Renner. The Born rules for calculating the probability of outcomes and for communicating with other observers do not generally apply for cat-measured observers, nor can they generally be amended to incorporate upcoming cat measurements. Quantum mechanical rules completed with these conditions become full…
-
Unitary-Only Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself: On the Frauchiger–Renner ParadoxR. Kastner · 2020 · Foundations of physics · Not summarized yet
Prior work it builds on
-
About Wigner Friend's and Hardy's paradox in a Bohmian approach: a comment of `Quantum theory cannot' consistently describe the use of itself'A. Drezet · 2018 · arXiv: Quantum Physics · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 17 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
This is an analysis of the recently published article `Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself' by D. Frauchiger and R. Renner~\cite{1}. Here I decipher the paradox and analyze it from the point of view of de Broglie-Bohm hidden variable theory (i.e., Bohmian mechanics). I also analyze the problem from the perspective obtained by the Copenhagen interpretation (i.e., the Bohrian interpretation) and show that both views are self consistent and do not lead to any contradiction with a `single-world' description of quantum theory.
-
Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanicsR. Omnes · 1992 · Reviews of Modern Physics · cited 520 times · Not summarized yet
-
On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theoryH. Zeh · 1970 · Foundations of Physics · cited 851 times · Not summarized yet
-
CONSISTENT SETS YIELD CONTRARY INFERENCES IN QUANTUM THEORYA. Kent · 1996 · Physical Review Letters · cited 86 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
In the consistent histories formulation of quantum theory, the probabilistic predictions and retrodictions made from observed data depend on the choice of a consistent set. We show that this freedom allows the formalism to retrodict contrary propositions which correspond to orthogonal commuting projections and which each have probability one. We also show that the formalism makes contrary probability one predictions when applied to Gell-Mann and Hartle{close_quote}s generalized time-neutral quantum mechanics. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}
-
Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?R. Colbeck, R. Renner · 2011 · Physical Review Letters · cited 197 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Although quantum mechanics is one of our most successful physical theories, there has been a long-standing debate about the interpretation of the wave function--the central object of the theory. Two prominent views are that (i) it corresponds to an element of reality, i.e., an objective attribute that exists before measurement, and (ii) it is a subjective state of knowledge about some underlying reality. A recent result [M. F. Pusey, J. Barrett, and T. Rudolph, arXiv:1111.3328] has placed the subjective interpretation into doubt, showing that it would contradict certain physically plausible assumptions, in particular, that multiple systems can be prepared such that their elements of reality …
Papers that cite it
-
Characterization of the nonclassical relation between measurement outcomes represented by nonorthogonal quantum statesMing Ji, H. Hofmann · 2022 · Physical Review A · cited 10 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Quantum mechanics describes seemingly paradoxical relations between the outcomes of measurements that cannot be performed jointly. In Hilbert space, the outcomes of such incompatible measurements are represented by non-orthogonal states. In this paper, we investigate how the relation between outcomes represented by non-orthogonal quantum states differs from the relations suggested by a joint assignment of measurement outcomes that do not depend on the actual measurement context. The analysis is based on a well-known scenario where three statements about the impossibilities of certain outcomes would seem to make a specific fourth outcome impossible as well, yet quantum theory allows the obser…
-
Testing quantum theory with thought experimentsN. Nurgalieva, R. Renner · 2020 · Contemporary Physics · cited 37 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Quantum mechanics is one of our most successful physical theories; its predictions agree with experimental observations to an extremely high accuracy. However, the bare formalism of quantum theory does not provide straightforward answers to seemingly simple questions: for example, how should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? These foundational questions may be investigated with a theorist's tool – the thought experiment. Its purpose is to turn debates about the interpretation of quantum theory into actual physics questions. In this article, we give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers, from the basic Wigne…
-
Quantum erasing the memory of Wigner's friendC. Elouard, P. Lewalle, S. Manikandan et al. · 2020 · Quantum · cited 29 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
The Wigner's friend paradox concerns one of the most puzzling problems of quantum mechanics: the consistent description of multiple nested observers. Recently, a variation of Wigner's gedankenexperiment, introduced by Frauchiger and Renner, has lead to new debates about the self-consistency of quantum mechanics. At the core of the paradox lies the description of an observer and the object it measures as a closed system obeying the Schrödinger equation. We revisit this assumption to derive a necessary condition on a quantum system to behave as an observer. We then propose a simple single-photon interferometric setup implementing Frauchiger and Renner's scenario, and use the derived condition …
-
A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradoxKok-Wei Bong, Aníbal Utreras-Alarcón, Farzad Ghafari et al. · 2020 · Nature Physics · cited 234 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Does quantum theory apply at all scales, including that of observers? New light on this fundamental question has recently been shed through a resurgence of interest in the long-standing Wigner’s friend paradox. This is a thought experiment addressing the quantum measurement problem—the difficulty of reconciling the (unitary, deterministic) evolution of isolated systems and the (non-unitary, probabilistic) state update after a measurement. Here, by building on a scenario with two separated but entangled friends introduced by Brukner, we prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of ‘No-Superdeterminism’, ‘Locality’ or ‘Absoluteness of Observed Events…
-
A no-go theorem for the persistent reality of Wigner’s friend’s perceptionPhilippe Allard Guérin, Veronika Baumann, Flavio Del Santo et al. · 2021 · Communications Physics · cited 82 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Abstract The notorious Wigner’s friend thought experiment (and modifications thereof) has received renewed interest especially due to new arguments that force us to question some of the fundamental assumptions of quantum theory. In this paper, we formulate a no-go theorem for the persistent reality of Wigner’s friend’s perception, which allows us to conclude that the perceptions that the friend has of her own measurement outcomes at different times cannot “share the same reality”, if seemingly natural quantum mechanical assumptions are met. More formally, this means that, in a Wigner’s friend scenario, there is no joint probability distribution for the friend’s perceived measurement outcomes…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
Updated on 6 November 2026.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.