AI summary · arXiv: 2105.09506v1 · physics.flu-dyn

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review

Shengze Cai, Zhiping Mao, Zhicheng Wang, Minglang Yin, George Em Karniadakis
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 20 May. 2021 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Challenges in simulating flow problems using numerical discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE)
  • Inability to incorporate noisy data seamlessly into existing algorithms
  • Complexity of mesh-generation and difficulty in tackling high-dimensional problems governed by parametrized NSE
  • Prohibitively expensive and complex formulations required for solving inverse flow problems
  • Proposal of a novel approach called flow physics-informed learning, integrating data and mathematical models seamlessly using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs)
  • Effectiveness of PINNs demonstrated through various inverse problems related to three-dimensional wake flows, supersonic flows, and biomedical flows
  • Promise of PINNs in accurately predicting flow behavior and solving inverse problems by combining neural networks with physical principles embedded in the NSE
  • Potential revolutionization of fluid mechanics research through integration of data-driven machine learning methods with physics-based models.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Navier-Stokes Equations Mesh Generation Inverse Flow Problems Machine Learning

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper titled "Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review," authors Shengze Cai, Zhiping Mao, Zhicheng Wang, Minglang Yin, and George Em Karniadakis discuss the challenges faced in simulating flow problems using numerical discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE). Despite significant progress made over the last 50 years, several issues persist. One such challenge is the inability to incorporate noisy data into existing algorithms seamlessly. Additionally, mesh-generation remains a complex task and high-dimensional problems governed by parametrized NSE are difficult to tackle. The authors highlight that solving inverse flow problems is often prohibitively expensive and requires complex formulations and new computer codes. To address these challenges, they propose a novel approach called flow physics-informed learning. This approach aims to integrate data and mathematical models seamlessly by leveraging physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). The effectiveness of PINNs is demonstrated through various inverse problems related to three-dimensional wake flows, supersonic flows, and biomedical flows. By combining the power of neural networks with physical principles embedded in the NSE, PINNs offer a promising solution for accurately predicting flow behavior and solving inverse problems. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the limitations of current flow simulation techniques and presents an innovative approach that shows promise in overcoming these challenges. The integration of data-driven machine learning methods with physics-based models has the potential to revolutionize fluid mechanics research and enable more efficient and accurate simulations in various applications.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Close
    Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D
    Nils Wandel, Michael Weinmann, Reinhard Klein · 2020 · Fluid Dynamics · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Physically plausible fluid simulations play an important role in modern computer graphics and engineering. However, in order to achieve real-time performance, computational speed needs to be traded-off with physical accuracy. Surrogate fluid models based on neural networks have the potential to achieve both, fast fluid simulations and high physical accuracy. However, these approaches rely on massive amounts of training data, require complex pipelines for training and inference or do not generalize to new fluid domains. In this work, we present significant extensions to a recently proposed deep learning framework, which addresses the aforementioned challenges in 2D. We go from 2D to 3D and pr…

  2. Close
    Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamics
    Dmitrii Kochkov, Jamie A. Smith, Ayya Alieva et al. · 2021 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Numerical simulation of fluids plays an essential role in modeling many physical phenomena, such as weather, climate, aerodynamics and plasma physics. Fluids are well described by the Navier-Stokes equations, but solving these equations at scale remains daunting, limited by the computational cost of resolving the smallest spatiotemporal features. This leads to unfavorable trade-offs between accuracy and tractability. Here we use end-to-end deep learning to improve approximations inside computational fluid dynamics for modeling two-dimensional turbulent flows. For both direct numerical simulation of turbulence and large eddy simulation, our results are as accurate as baseline solvers with 8-1…

  3. Close
    Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learning
    Ricardo Vinuesa, Steven L. Brunton · 2021 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Machine learning is rapidly becoming a core technology for scientific computing, with numerous opportunities to advance the field of computational fluid dynamics. In this Perspective, we highlight some of the areas of highest potential impact, including to accelerate direct numerical simulations, to improve turbulence closure modeling, and to develop enhanced reduced-order models. We also discuss emerging areas of machine learning that are promising for computational fluid dynamics, as well as some potential limitations that should be taken into account.

  4. Close
    Fluid Intelligence: A Forward Look on AI Foundation Models in Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Neil Ashton, Johannes Brandstetter, Siddhartha Mishra · 2025 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Driven by the advancement of GPUs and AI, the field of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is undergoing significant transformations. This paper bridges the gap between the machine learning and CFD communities by deconstructing industrial-scale CFD simulations into their core components. Our main contribution is to propose the first scaling law that incorporates CFD inputs for both data generation and model training to outline the unique challenges of developing and deploying these next-generation AI models for complex fluid dynamics problems. Using our new scaling law, we establish quantitative estimates for the large-scale limit, distinguishing between regimes where the cost of data generat…

  5. Close
    Fluid Simulation System Based on Graph Neural Network
    Qiang Liu, Wei Zhu, Xiyu Jia et al. · 2022 · Fluid Dynamics · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Traditional computational fluid dynamics calculates the physical information of the flow field by solving partial differential equations, which takes a long time to calculate and consumes a lot of computational resources. We build a fluid simulation simulator based on the graph neural network architecture. The simulator has fast computing speed and low consumption of computing resources. We regard the computational domain as a structural graph, and the computational nodes in the structural graph determine neighbor nodes through adaptive sampling. Building deep learning architectures with attention graph neural networks. The fluid simulation simulator is trained according to the simulation re…

  6. Close
    NeurIPS 2024 ML4CFD Competition: Harnessing Machine Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics in Airfoil Design
    Mouadh Yagoubi, David Danan, Milad Leyli-abadi et al. · 2024 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The integration of machine learning (ML) techniques for addressing intricate physics problems is increasingly recognized as a promising avenue for expediting simulations. However, assessing ML-derived physical models poses a significant challenge for their adoption within industrial contexts. This competition is designed to promote the development of innovative ML approaches for tackling physical challenges, leveraging our recently introduced unified evaluation framework known as Learning Industrial Physical Simulations (LIPS). Building upon the preliminary edition held from November 2023 to March 2024, this iteration centers on a task fundamental to a well-established physical application: …

  7. Related
    DRLinFluids -- An open-source python platform of coupling Deep Reinforcement Learning and OpenFOAM
    Qiulei Wang, Lei Yan, Gang Hu et al. · 2022 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We propose an open-source python platform for applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) in fluid mechanics. DRL has been widely used in optimizing decision-making in nonlinear and high-dimensional problems. Here, an agent maximizes a cumulative reward with learning a feedback policy by acting in an environment. In control theory terms, the cumulative reward would correspond to the cost function, the agent to the actuator, the environment to the measured signals and the learned policy to the feedback law. Thus, DRL assumes an interactive environment or, equivalently, control plant. The setup of a numerical simulation plant with DRL is challenging and time-consuming. In this work, a no…

  8. Related
    Simulating fluid-fluid displacement in a soft capillary tube: How compliance delays interfacial instability and bubble pinch-off
    Sthavishtha R. Bhopalam, Ruben Juanes, Hector Gomez · 2025 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The displacement of a more viscous fluid by a less viscous immiscible fluid in confined geometries is a fundamental problem in multiphase flows. Recent experiments have shown that such fluid-fluid displacement in micro-capillary tubes can lead to interfacial instabilities and, eventually, bubble pinch-off. A critical yet often overlooked aspect of this system is the effect of the tube's deformability on the onset of interfacial instability and bubble pinch-off. Here, we present a computational fluid-structure interaction model and an algorithm to simulate this fluid-fluid displacement problem in a soft capillary tube. We use a phase-field model for the fluids and a nonlinear hyperelastic mod…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.