AI summary · arXiv: 2102.01010v1 · physics.flu-dyn

Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamics

Dmitrii Kochkov, Jamie A. Smith, Ayya Alieva, Qing Wang, Michael P. Brenner, Stephan Hoyer
Original paper · DOI 10.1073/pnas.2101784118 Submitted to arXiv on 28 Jan. 2021 13 pages, 9 figures License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0 Also in: fr

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The summary is not ready yet

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close
    Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learning
    Ricardo Vinuesa, Steven L. Brunton · 2021 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Machine learning is rapidly becoming a core technology for scientific computing, with numerous opportunities to advance the field of computational fluid dynamics. In this Perspective, we highlight some of the areas of highest potential impact, including to accelerate direct numerical simulations, to improve turbulence closure modeling, and to develop enhanced reduced-order models. We also discuss emerging areas of machine learning that are promising for computational fluid dynamics, as well as some potential limitations that should be taken into account.

  2. Very close
    Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D
    Nils Wandel, Michael Weinmann, Reinhard Klein · 2020 · Fluid Dynamics · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Physically plausible fluid simulations play an important role in modern computer graphics and engineering. However, in order to achieve real-time performance, computational speed needs to be traded-off with physical accuracy. Surrogate fluid models based on neural networks have the potential to achieve both, fast fluid simulations and high physical accuracy. However, these approaches rely on massive amounts of training data, require complex pipelines for training and inference or do not generalize to new fluid domains. In this work, we present significant extensions to a recently proposed deep learning framework, which addresses the aforementioned challenges in 2D. We go from 2D to 3D and pr…

  3. Close
    Fluid Intelligence: A Forward Look on AI Foundation Models in Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Neil Ashton, Johannes Brandstetter, Siddhartha Mishra · 2025 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Driven by the advancement of GPUs and AI, the field of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is undergoing significant transformations. This paper bridges the gap between the machine learning and CFD communities by deconstructing industrial-scale CFD simulations into their core components. Our main contribution is to propose the first scaling law that incorporates CFD inputs for both data generation and model training to outline the unique challenges of developing and deploying these next-generation AI models for complex fluid dynamics problems. Using our new scaling law, we establish quantitative estimates for the large-scale limit, distinguishing between regimes where the cost of data generat…

  4. Close
    NeurIPS 2024 ML4CFD Competition: Harnessing Machine Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics in Airfoil Design
    Mouadh Yagoubi, David Danan, Milad Leyli-abadi et al. · 2024 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The integration of machine learning (ML) techniques for addressing intricate physics problems is increasingly recognized as a promising avenue for expediting simulations. However, assessing ML-derived physical models poses a significant challenge for their adoption within industrial contexts. This competition is designed to promote the development of innovative ML approaches for tackling physical challenges, leveraging our recently introduced unified evaluation framework known as Learning Industrial Physical Simulations (LIPS). Building upon the preliminary edition held from November 2023 to March 2024, this iteration centers on a task fundamental to a well-established physical application: …

  5. Close
    Fluid Simulation System Based on Graph Neural Network
    Qiang Liu, Wei Zhu, Xiyu Jia et al. · 2022 · Fluid Dynamics · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Traditional computational fluid dynamics calculates the physical information of the flow field by solving partial differential equations, which takes a long time to calculate and consumes a lot of computational resources. We build a fluid simulation simulator based on the graph neural network architecture. The simulator has fast computing speed and low consumption of computing resources. We regard the computational domain as a structural graph, and the computational nodes in the structural graph determine neighbor nodes through adaptive sampling. Building deep learning architectures with attention graph neural networks. The fluid simulation simulator is trained according to the simulation re…

  6. Close
    Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review
    Shengze Cai, Zhiping Mao, Zhicheng Wang et al. · 2021 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Despite the significant progress over the last 50 years in simulating flow problems using numerical discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE), we still cannot incorporate seamlessly noisy data into existing algorithms, mesh-generation is complex, and we cannot tackle high-dimensional problems governed by parametrized NSE. Moreover, solving inverse flow problems is often prohibitively expensive and requires complex and expensive formulations and new computer codes. Here, we review flow physics-informed learning, integrating seamlessly data and mathematical models, and implementing them using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). We demonstrate the effectiveness of PINNs for inve…

  7. Close
    DRLinFluids -- An open-source python platform of coupling Deep Reinforcement Learning and OpenFOAM
    Qiulei Wang, Lei Yan, Gang Hu et al. · 2022 · Fluid Dynamics · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We propose an open-source python platform for applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) in fluid mechanics. DRL has been widely used in optimizing decision-making in nonlinear and high-dimensional problems. Here, an agent maximizes a cumulative reward with learning a feedback policy by acting in an environment. In control theory terms, the cumulative reward would correspond to the cost function, the agent to the actuator, the environment to the measured signals and the learned policy to the feedback law. Thus, DRL assumes an interactive environment or, equivalently, control plant. The setup of a numerical simulation plant with DRL is challenging and time-consuming. In this work, a no…

  8. Close
    Data-driven and machine-learning based prediction of wave propagation behavior in dam-break flood
    Changli Li, Zheng Han, Yange Li et al. · 2022 · Fluid Dynamics · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    The computational prediction of wave propagation in dam-break floods is a long-standing problem in hydrodynamics and hydrology. Until now, conventional numerical models based on Saint-Venant equations are the dominant approaches. Here we show that a machine learning model that is well-trained on a minimal amount of data, can help predict the long-term dynamic behavior of a one-dimensional dam-break flood with satisfactory accuracy. For this purpose, we solve the Saint-Venant equations for a one-dimensional dam-break flood scenario using the Lax-Wendroff numerical scheme and train the reservoir computing echo state network (RC-ESN) with the dataset by the simulation results consisting of time…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.