Energy- and momentum-resolved Cooper-pair emission from a cuprate superconductor

Henry Amir; Jack Zwettler; Ka Ho Wong; Genda Gu; Rafael M. Fernandes; Jorge Noronha; Dirk K. Morr; Fahad Mahmood

AI summary · arXiv: 2611.09857v1 · cond-mat.supr-con

Energy- and momentum-resolved Cooper-pair emission from a cuprate superconductor

Henry Amir, Jack Zwettler, Ka Ho Wong, Genda Gu, Rafael M. Fernandes, Jorge Noronha, Dirk K. Morr, Fahad Mahmood

Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 06 Nov. 2026 License: CC BY 4.0 Also in: fr

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

Two-electron ARPES detects a zero-momentum, zero-binding-energy Cooper-pair emission peak in an optimally doped cuprate and reveals unusual temperature-dependent broadening.

Based on the abstract only: check the details in the original paper.

Question

Can photoemission detect Cooper pairs directly, rather than only individual electrons, in a cuprate superconductor? What can the pair-emission signal reveal about superconducting-state dynamics?

Method

The authors use two-electron angle-resolved photoemission (2e-ARPES) on an optimally doped cuprate superconductor. They examine the pair’s energy and momentum distributions as temperature changes, including across the superconducting transition.

Findings

Result Below the superconducting transition, the authors observe a distinct pair-emission peak at zero pair binding energy and zero pair momentum that disappears in the normal state.
See the passage in the paper
Below the superconducting transition, we observe a distinct two-electron emission peak at zero pair binding energy and zero pair momentum that disappears in the normal state, revealing the characteristic fingerprint of a Cooper pair.
Result As temperature decreases, the joint energy distribution broadens along the relative-energy axis, while its total energy width remains nearly unchanged.
See the passage in the paper
Unexpectedly, the joint energy distribution broadens markedly along the relative-energy axis as temperature decreases, while the total energy width remains nearly unchanged.
Authors’ interpretation The authors report that instrumental resolution, static disorder, and thermal broadening cannot explain the anomalous broadening.
See the passage in the paper
This anomalous behavior cannot be explained by instrumental resolution, static disorder or thermal broadening, and instead points to scattering processes involving collective excitations of the superconductor.
Authors’ interpretation The authors present 2e-ARPES as a probe of Cooper-pair emission and superconducting-state many-body dynamics.
See the passage in the paper
Our results establish 2e-ARPES as a probe of both Cooper-pair emission and the many-body dynamics of the superconducting state.

Limitations

The reported observations concern an optimally doped cuprate superconductor, so the abstract does not establish whether they apply to other materials or doping levels.

Why it matters

The authors argue that 2e-ARPES provides a way to detect Cooper-pair emission directly and to probe many-body dynamics in the superconducting state.

Written by AI from the paper. Passages are checked word for word against the text we analysed; the rest may contain errors.

AI-generated keywords: 2e-ARPES; Cooper pairs; cuprate superconductors; photoemission; collective excitations

Read further

Comprehensive Summary
Layman's Summary
Blog article
Original abstract

The paper asks whether photoemission can detect Cooper pairs directly, rather than only the individual electrons typically measured in photoemission experiments. It reports a study of an optimally doped cuprate superconductor using two-electron angle-resolved photoemission (2e-ARPES). This technique measures the energies and momenta of two emitted electrons together, enabling the authors to search for a signal associated with a pair. Below the superconducting transition temperature, the authors observe a distinct peak in the two-electron emission signal at zero pair binding energy and zero total pair momentum. The peak disappears in the normal state. They interpret this signal—present only in the superconducting state and located at the expected energy and momentum—as a characteristic fingerprint of Cooper-pair emission. The experiment therefore demonstrates a way to probe pairs through their joint emission, rather than inferring pairing solely from measurements of individual electrons. The paper also examines how the emitted-pair distribution changes with temperature. As the temperature decreases, the joint energy distribution broadens markedly along the relative-energy axis, which represents the energy difference between the two electrons. By contrast, the width along the total-energy direction remains nearly unchanged. This unequal temperature dependence suggests that the broadening is not simply an overall increase in the measured energy spread. The authors state that instrumental resolution, static disorder, and thermal broadening do not account for the relative-energy broadening. They propose that scattering involving collective excitations of the superconducting state may be responsible. On this interpretation, 2e-ARPES could reveal both Cooper-pair emission and many-body dynamics in the superconducting material. The abstract does not provide numerical values for the transition temperature, peak position or intensity, energy widths, temperature range, or instrumental resolution. These quantities therefore cannot be reported from the available material. The broader conclusion is that two-electron photoemission may serve as a probe of superconducting pairing and of processes affecting pairs within the material. This summary is necessarily limited because only the title and abstract are available; the paper’s license does not permit access to its full text. As a result, the experimental setup and analysis, sample and measurement parameters, quantitative results, uncertainty estimates, controls, and evidence for excluding alternative explanations cannot be assessed here. The proposed role of collective excitations is an interpretation of the observations, not a conclusively established cause.

Can Photoemission Detect Cooper Pairs Directly?

Photoemission experiments usually measure electrons one at a time. But superconductivity is built around Cooper pairs: linked electrons whose collective behavior allows electric current to flow without resistance. Could researchers detect those pairs through their joint emission, instead of inferring their presence from measurements of individual electrons?

In “Energy- and momentum-resolved Cooper-pair emission from a cuprate superconductor,” Henry Amir, Jack Zwettler, Ka Ho Wong, Genda Gu, Rafael M. Fernandes, Jorge Noronha et al. investigate that question. They use two-electron angle-resolved photoemission, or 2e-ARPES, to measure the energies and momenta of two emitted electrons together. The reported results suggest that this method can reveal a signal associated with Cooper-pair emission—and may also offer a window into processes affecting pairs inside a superconductor.

Looking for a Joint Signal

The experiment studies an optimally doped cuprate superconductor. In 2e-ARPES, the key is to consider the two electrons as a pair of measurements rather than as separate emissions. Their combined energy and total momentum can then be examined for a feature that would be difficult to identify by looking at either electron alone.

Below the superconducting transition temperature, the researchers report a distinct peak at zero pair binding energy and zero total pair momentum. The peak disappears when the material is in its normal state. Because the feature occurs at the expected energy and momentum, and only in the superconducting state, the authors interpret it as a characteristic fingerprint of Cooper-pair emission.

This finding points to a different way of studying superconductivity. Rather than relying only on properties of individual electrons to infer pairing, researchers can look for evidence in the joint emission of two electrons. The distinction matters: a measurement that responds directly to pairs could help connect the behavior of Cooper pairs inside a material with the particles detected outside it.

Temperature Changes the Pair Distribution

The study also tracks how the emitted-pair distribution changes with temperature. As the temperature decreases, the joint energy distribution broadens markedly along the relative-energy axis—the axis describing the energy difference between the two electrons.

The broadening is not the same in every direction. Along the total-energy direction, the width remains nearly unchanged. That contrast suggests the effect is not simply a general increase in the experiment’s measured energy spread. Instead, the changing distribution appears to be tied more specifically to the energy relationship between the two electrons.

The authors state that instrumental resolution, static disorder, and thermal broadening do not account for this relative-energy broadening. They propose that scattering involving collective excitations of the superconducting state may be responsible. In other words, the same technique that identifies a possible pair-emission signal might also be sensitive to interactions between pairs and the material’s collective behavior.

What the Results Do—and Do Not—Establish

The reported peak provides a notable result: a two-electron signal appears at the expected pair energy and momentum in the superconducting state, then vanishes in the normal state. The temperature-dependent broadening adds another clue about the dynamics that may shape the emitted pairs.

Still, the proposed role of collective excitations is an interpretation, not a conclusively established cause. The available summary does not include numerical values for the transition temperature, peak position or intensity, energy widths, temperature range, or instrumental resolution. Those quantities therefore cannot be reported here.

The account is also limited to the paper’s title and abstract, rather than its full text. As a result, the experimental setup and analysis, sample and measurement parameters, quantitative results, uncertainty estimates, controls, and the evidence used to exclude alternative explanations cannot be assessed. These details would be important for judging how robustly the measurements distinguish pair emission from other possible sources of a two-electron signal.

A New Route to Studying Superconductors

Despite those limits, the study presents 2e-ARPES as a promising approach to probing superconductivity through the joint behavior of emitted electrons. Its potential reaches beyond identifying a Cooper-pair fingerprint: the temperature-dependent distribution may also help researchers investigate the processes that influence pairs within a material.

The broader message is that superconducting pairing may be studied not only by examining individual electrons, but also by measuring how two electrons emerge together. If further work clarifies the method’s interpretation and underlying dynamics, 2e-ARPES could become a useful tool for exploring both the presence of Cooper pairs and the many-body environment in which they exist.

Created on 09 Nov. 2026

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 1 free rewrite left today

Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Obsidian (Markdown) · Notion (Markdown)

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero

Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Who works on it? The people and institutions who publish on its topic

Weekly letter Presented in "Physics of matter and light this week" of 9 November 2026. Physics of matter and light this week: New structures, paired electrons and the limits of looking

Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it Propose for the journal club

Versions What changed between versions

Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check Press kit guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

Close Same question
Direct observation of non-local fermion pairing in an attractive Fermi-Hubbard gas
Thomas Hartke, Botond Oreg, Carter Turnbaugh et al. · 2022 · Science 381, 82 (2023) · cited 69 times · AI summary available

Directly observes non-local fermion pairs in an attractive Fermi-Hubbard gas, whereas this paper detects emitted Cooper pairs in a cuprate.

Abstract
Pairing of fermions lies at the heart of superconductivity, the hierarchy of nuclear binding energies and superfluidity of neutron stars. The Hubbard model of attractively interacting fermions provides a paradigmatic setting for fermion pairing, featuring a crossover between Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of tightly bound pairs and Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) superfluidity of long-range Cooper pairs, and a "pseudo-gap" region where pairs form already above the superfluid critical temperature. We here directly observe the non-local nature of fermion pairing in a Hubbard lattice gas, employing spin- and density-resolved imaging of $\sim$1000 fermionic ${}^{40}$K atoms under a bilayer mic…
Close Broader context
Cooper pairing of incoherent electrons: an electron-phonon version of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model
Ilya Esterlis, Jörg Schmalian · 2019 · Phys. Rev. B 100, 115132 (2019) · cited 106 times · AI summary available

The model studies electron pairing and superconductivity in an incoherent-electron system, rather than measuring pair emission from a cuprate.

Abstract
We introduce and solve a model of interacting electrons and phonons that is a natural generalization of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev-model and that becomes superconducting at low temperatures. In the normal state two Non-Fermi liquid fixed points with distinct universal exponents emerge. At weak coupling superconductivity prevents the onset of low-temperature quantum criticality, reminiscent of the behavior in several heavy-electron and iron-based materials. At strong coupling, pairing of highly incoherent fermions sets in deep in the Non-Fermi liquid regime, a behavior qualitatively similar to that in underdoped cuprate superconductors. The pairing of incoherent time-reversal partners is protected…
Close Same question
Dynamics of Non-superconducting Pairs in YBa2Cu3O7-δ Below Tc
Jinzhong Zhang, Xinhang Cai, Qingming Huang et al. · 2024 · Superconductivity · AI summary available

The study probes local and superconducting pairs in optimally doped YBa2Cu3O7-δ, using terahertz recovery dynamics rather than two-electron photoemission.

Abstract
Pairing states are essential for understanding the underlying mechanisms of high-temperature superconductivity. Here the non-superconducting state in an optimally doped YBa2Cu3O7-{\delta} film was driven out of equilibrium by an optical pump with low fluence at a temperature well below the critical temperature (Tc), and its recovery dynamics were exclusively measured using transient terahertz spectroscopy. The pump-fluence dependent experiments unveiled evidence of local pairs without superconductivity coexisting with the superconducting Cooper pairs. An energy gap opening induced by the local pairing with short-range coherence was invoked to rationalize the temperature-dependent recovery ti…
Close Broader context
Nodeless d-wave pairing in monolayer FeSe revealed by intra-unit-cell Josephson interferometry
Runxin Li, Yuchen Huo, Jiong Mei et al. · 2026 · Superconductivity · cited 2 times · AI summary available

The study uses atomic-scale Josephson interferometry to examine d-wave pairing symmetry in monolayer FeSe, rather than detecting emitted Cooper pairs.

In short
Atomic-scale Josephson imaging reveals a bond-centred response with Fe–Se nodal lines in monolayer FeSe, which calculations identify as a signature of nodeless d-wave pairing.
Related Same method, another problem
Heralded spectroscopy reveals exciton-exciton correlations in single colloidal quantum dots
Gur Lubin, Ron Tenne, Arin Can Ulku et al. · 2021 · Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 6756-6763 · cited 45 times · AI summary available

Heralded spectroscopy directly resolves correlated pair emission from quantum dots, applying a pair-sensitive spectroscopy approach to excitons rather than Cooper pairs.

Abstract
Multiply-excited states in semiconductor quantum dots feature intriguing physics and play a crucial role in nanocrystal-based technologies. While photoluminescence provides a natural probe to investigate these states, room temperature single-particle spectroscopy of their emission has so far proved elusive due to the temporal and spectral overlap with emission from the singly-excited and charged states. Here we introduce biexciton heralded spectroscopy, enabled by a single-photon avalanche diode array based spectrometer. This allows us to directly observe biexciton-exciton emission cascades and measure the biexciton binding energy of single quantum dots at room temperature, even though it is…
Related Broader context
Measuring total density correlations in a Fermi-Hubbard gas via bilayer microscopy
Thomas Hartke, Botond Oreg, Ningyuan Jia et al. · 2020 · Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 113601 (2020) · cited 5 times · Not summarized yet

The study measures atom-pair density correlations in a Fermi-Hubbard gas, not Cooper-pair emission from a superconductor.

Abstract
We report on the single atom and single site-resolved detection of the total density in a cold atom realization of the 2D Fermi-Hubbard model. Fluorescence imaging of doublons is achieved by splitting each lattice site into a double well, thereby separating atom pairs. Full density readout yields a direct measurement of the equation of state, including direct thermometry via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. Site-resolved density correlations reveal the Pauli hole at low filling, and strong doublon-hole correlations near half filling. These are shown to account for the difference between local and non-local density fluctuations in the Mott insulator. Our technique enables the study of ato…
Related Broader context
Competing itinerant and local spin interactions in kagome metal FeGe
Lebing Chen, Xiaokun Teng, Hengxin Tan et al. · 2023 · Nat Commun 15, 1918 (2024) · cited 25 times · AI summary available

The study examines competing magnetic and charge-density-wave phases in kagome FeGe, a neighbouring problem in correlated-electron materials.

Abstract
Two-dimensional kagome metals consisting of corner-sharing triangles offer a unique platform for studying strong electron correlations and band topology due to its geometrically frustrated lattice structure. The similar energy scales between spin, lattice, and electronic degrees of freedom in these systems give rise to competing quantum phases such as charge density wave (CDW), magnetic order, and superconductivity. For example, kagome metal FeGe first exhibits A-type collinear antiferromagnetic (AFM) order at T_N ~ 400 K, then establishes a CDW phase coupled with AFM ordered moment below T_CDW ~ 100 K, and finally forms a $c$-axis double cone AFM structure around T_Canting ~ 60 K. Here we u…
Related Broader context
Superradiance as a witness to multipartite entanglement
Frederik Lohof, Daniel Schumayer, David A. W. Hutchinson et al. · 2023 · Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 063601 (2023) · cited 16 times · AI summary available

The study connects correlated emission to multipartite entanglement in quantum emitters, rather than measuring Cooper-pair emission.

Abstract
Generation and detection of entanglement is at the forefront of most quantum information technologies. There is a plethora of techniques that reveal entanglement on the basis of only partial information about the underlying quantum state including, in particular, entanglement witnesses. Superradiance refers to the phenomenon of highly synchronized photon emission from an ensemble of quantum emitters that is caused by correlations among the individual particles and has been connected by Dicke himself to the presence of multipartite entangled states. We investigate this connection in a quantitative way and discuss, whether or not signatures of superradiance from semiconductor nanolasers, manif…

Go further

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

Updated on 9 November 2026.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.

Energy- and momentum-resolved Cooper-pair emission from a cuprate superconductor

The essentials

Question

Method

Findings

Limitations

Why it matters

Read further

Definitions

Can Photoemission Detect Cooper Pairs Directly?

Looking for a Joint Signal

Temperature Changes the Pair Distribution

What the Results Do—and Do Not—Establish

A New Route to Studying Superconductors

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Tools for this paper

Advanced tools Premium

Papers around this one

Closest papers

Go further

Cite this paper (BibTeX)