AI summary · arXiv: 2611.09573v1 · physics.ao-ph
Half-precision inference of AI weather prediction models: negligible loss of skill at a fraction of the cost
The essentials
Running five AI weather models with network computations in fp16 and physical states in fp32 preserves forecast skill closely while reducing runtime and energy use.
Based on the abstract only: check the details in the original paper.
Question
Can half-precision inference reduce the computational cost of AI weather prediction without materially degrading forecast skill? The study also examines where reduced precision affects model accuracy and compares fp16 with bf16 and 8-bit quantisation.
Method
The author ran Aurora, Pangu-Weather, FourCastNet, SFNO and FastNet on a single 16 GB GPU from 52 initial dates in 2024, comparing fp32 and fp16 forecasts against ERA5. The physical state and its normalisation and denormalisation remained in fp32; experiments also tested sensitivity to reduced precision and compared speed, energy use, ensemble properties, bf16 and 8-bit quantisation.
Findings
-
Result
With the physical state and its normalisation and denormalisation kept in fp32, fp16 changed global RMSE by at most 1.4%, and by about 0.5% or less for four models.
See the passage in the paper
With the state, its normalisation and denormalisation in fp32, running the network in fp16 changes the global RMSE by at most 1.4%, and by about 0.5% or less for four of the five models, equivalent to less than one hour of lead time up to day 8 and at most two hours at day 10.
-
Result
The study found no systematic regional, scale, or storm-type pattern in forecast differences, apart from a small tropical penalty in FourCastNet.
See the passage in the paper
The differences show no systematic pattern by region, scale or for tropical and extratropical storms, apart from a small tropical penalty in FourCastNet, and fp16 leaves the CRPS, spread and calibration of Aurora's ensemble almost unchanged.
-
Result
A 10-day fp16 forecast was 1.3–3.5 times faster and used 1.4–3.7 times less energy than fp32.
See the passage in the paper
A 10-day forecast in fp16 is 1.3-3.5 times faster than in fp32 and uses 1.4-3.7 times less energy.
- Result The study reports that layer sensitivity varied among models, and that bf16 and simple 8-bit quantisation did not match fp16's accuracy.
Limitations
- The evaluation covers five publicly available models, 52 initial dates in 2024, and forecasts verified against ERA5; the abstract does not establish performance beyond this scope.
- The findings apply to an inference setup that keeps the physical state and its normalisation and denormalisation in fp32; converting the whole model is not viable in the reported setup.
See the passage in the paper
The physical state must stay in fp32: converting the whole model rounds it in physical units, which in fp16 overflows and in bf16 discards meaningful information.
Why it matters
The authors argue that fp16 network inference, with the physical state kept in fp32, offers a practical way to run AI weather models on a single GPU with little loss of skill and substantially lower cost. Their model-specific sensitivity results caution against assuming reduced-precision rules from other applications will transfer directly.
Written by AI from the paper. Passages are checked word for word against the text we analysed; the rest may contain errors.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Continue with Google Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
FP8-LM: Training FP8 Large Language ModelsHouwen Peng, Kan Wu, Yixuan Wei et al. · 2023 · Machine Learning · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 105 times · AI summary available
FP8-LM develops mixed-precision training for large language models, whereas this paper tests half-precision inference in AI weather models.
Abstract
In this paper, we explore FP8 low-bit data formats for efficient training of large language models (LLMs). Our key insight is that most variables, such as gradients and optimizer states, in LLM training can employ low-precision data formats without compromising model accuracy and requiring no changes to hyper-parameters. Specifically, we propose a new FP8 automatic mixed-precision framework for training LLMs. This framework offers three levels of FP8 utilization to streamline mixed-precision and distributed parallel training for LLMs. It gradually incorporates 8-bit gradients, optimizer states, and distributed learning in an incremental manner. Experiment results show that, during the traini…
-
Pangu-Weather: A 3D High-Resolution Model for Fast and Accurate Global Weather ForecastKaifeng Bi, Lingxi Xie, Hengheng Zhang et al. · 2022 · Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 309 times · AI summary available
Pangu-Weather is one of the AI weather forecasting models whose fp32 and fp16 inference costs and forecast skill this paper compares.
Abstract
In this paper, we present Pangu-Weather, a deep learning based system for fast and accurate global weather forecast. For this purpose, we establish a data-driven environment by downloading $43$ years of hourly global weather data from the 5th generation of ECMWF reanalysis (ERA5) data and train a few deep neural networks with about $256$ million parameters in total. The spatial resolution of forecast is $0.25^\circ\times0.25^\circ$, comparable to the ECMWF Integrated Forecast Systems (IFS). More importantly, for the first time, an AI-based method outperforms state-of-the-art numerical weather prediction (NWP) methods in terms of accuracy (latitude-weighted RMSE and ACC) of all factors (e.g.,…
-
FP4 All the Way: Fully Quantized Training of LLMsBrian Chmiel, Maxim Fishman, Ron Banner et al. · 2025 · Machine Learning · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 48 times · AI summary available
FP4 All the Way studies low-precision formats for training language models, while this paper measures reduced-precision inference for weather forecasting.
Abstract
We demonstrate, for the first time, fully quantized training (FQT) of large language models (LLMs) using predominantly 4-bit floating-point (FP4) precision for weights, activations, and gradients on datasets up to 200 billion tokens. We extensively investigate key design choices for FP4, including block sizes, scaling formats, and rounding methods. Our analysis shows that the NVFP4 format, where each block of 16 FP4 values (E2M1) shares a scale represented in E4M3, provides optimal results. We use stochastic rounding for backward and update passes and round-to-nearest for the forward pass to enhance stability. Additionally, we identify a theoretical and empirical threshold for effective quan…
-
Adding NVMe SSDs to Enable and Accelerate 100B Model Fine-tuning on a Single GPUChangyue Liao, Mo Sun, Zihan Yang et al. · 2024 · Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing · cited 15 times · AI summary available
Adding NVMe SSDs enables large-model fine-tuning on one GPU, while this paper reduces the cost of weather-model inference on one GPU.
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models have brought immense value to the world, with their superior capabilities stemming from the massive number of parameters they utilize. However, even the GPUs with the highest memory capacities, currently peaking at 80GB, are far from sufficient to accommodate these vast parameters and their associated optimizer states when conducting stochastic gradient descent-based optimization. One approach to hosting such huge models is to aggregate device memory from many GPUs. However, this approach introduces prohibitive costs for most academic researchers, who always have a limited budget for many high-end GPU servers. In this paper, we focus on huge model fin…
-
WRF-JAX v1.1.28: a differentiable regional weather model with fully coupled physics, numerically consistent with WRF and matching 128-process CPU performance on a single GPUShijin Yuan, Tianyu Shen, Bin Mu et al. · 2026 · Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics · AI summary available
WRF-JAX reimplements a regional numerical weather model on a GPU; this paper evaluates precision and cost in AI weather forecasts.
In short
WRF-JAX reproduces WRF’s coupled regional simulations near its internal numerical-difference baseline, matches measured 128-process CPU throughput on one GPU, and provides approximate gradients through fully coupled physics.
-
Towards High Performance, Portability, and Productivity: Lightweight Augmented Neural Networks for Performance PredictionAjitesh Srivastava, Naifeng Zhang, Rajgopal Kannan et al. · 2020 · Performance · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet
Lightweight augmented neural networks predict hardware performance, whereas this paper measures inference speed and energy under reduced precision.
Abstract
Writing high-performance code requires significant expertise in the programming language, compiler optimizations, and hardware knowledge. This often leads to poor productivity and portability and is inconvenient for a non-programmer domain-specialist such as a Physicist. More desirable is a high-level language where the domain-specialist simply specifies the workload in terms of high-level operations (e.g., matrix-multiply(A, B)), and the compiler identifies the best implementation fully utilizing the heterogeneous platform. For creating a compiler that supports productivity, portability, and performance simultaneously, it is crucial to predict the performance of various available implementa…
-
Shedding the Bits: Pushing the Boundaries of Quantization with Minifloats on FPGAsShivam Aggarwal, Hans Jakob Damsgaard, Alessandro Pappalardo et al. · 2023 · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · cited 10 times · Not summarized yet
Shedding the Bits evaluates reduced-precision formats for FPGA model inference, while this paper tests fp16 and other formats in AI weather models.
Abstract
Post-training quantization (PTQ) is a powerful technique for model compression, reducing the numerical precision in neural networks without additional training overhead. Recent works have investigated adopting 8-bit floating-point formats(FP8) in the context of PTQ for model inference. However, floating-point formats smaller than 8 bits and their relative comparison in terms of accuracy-hardware cost with integers remains unexplored on FPGAs. In this work, we present minifloats, which are reduced-precision floating-point formats capable of further reducing the memory footprint, latency, and energy cost of a model while approaching full-precision model accuracy. We implement a custom FPGA-bas…
-
Accuracy is not compatibility: two Evo 2 checkpoints hinge on one FP8 matrix multiplicationXun Ding, Ziyuan Qin · 2026 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
Accuracy is not compatibility examines how FP8 matrix multiplication affects DNA-model checkpoints, while this paper studies precision effects on weather forecasts.
In short
Two Evo 2 checkpoints depend on reference FP8 accumulation rather than numerical accuracy; emulating their first projection largely restores model behaviour and BRCA1 variant scoring.
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
Updated on 9 November 2026.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.