AI summary · arXiv: 2611.01434v1 · quant-ph

Boson sampling is fragile to loss

Youngrong Lim
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 01 Nov. 2026 9+30 pages, 1 figure. Identical to the version posted on Zenodo on 21 October 2026 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23528696) License: not stated (all rights reserved) Also in: fr

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

Fixed nonzero uniform photon loss makes the specified boson-sampling distributions efficiently classically approximable on average, even when detected photon numbers grow linearly with system size.

Based on the abstract only: check the details in the original paper.

Question

Does the computational hardness of boson sampling survive photon loss as the system grows? The paper asks whether small but fixed uniform loss allows efficient classical sampling.

Method

The authors use loss-induced suppression of correlations involving many photons to approximate the output distribution using only low correlation orders. They establish polynomial-time sampling in system size and inverse total variation error, with error averaged over Haar-random interferometers, for Fock-state sampling with single photons in distinct inputs and arbitrary extra vacuum inputs, and for Gaussian boson sampling with equal, bounded-strength squeezing.

Findings

  • Result Any fixed, nonzero uniform loss rate permits efficient classical sampling in the average case as the system grows.
    See the passage in the paper
    We show that even an arbitrarily small nonzero uniform loss rate permits efficient classical sampling in the average case when the rate remains fixed as the system grows.
  • Authors’ interpretation The approximation works by retaining low-order correlations because loss suppresses correlations involving many photons.
    See the passage in the paper
    We exploit how loss suppresses correlations involving many photons to approximate the full output distribution using low correlation orders.
  • Result The resulting samplers have runtime polynomial in system size and inverse total variation error, with the guarantee averaged over Haar-random interferometers.
    See the passage in the paper
    The resulting samplers run in time polynomial in system size and inverse total variation error, with the error averaged over Haar random interferometers.
  • Authors’ interpretation Large detected photon counts alone do not guarantee computational hardness under the stated loss conditions.
    See the passage in the paper
    Classical sampling is efficient even when the mean detected photon number grows linearly with system size, showing that large photon counts alone do not ensure computational hardness.

Limitations

  • The stated results cover specific input families and loss conditions, so the abstract does not establish the same conclusion for other boson-sampling setups.
    See the passage in the paper
    The results apply to Fock state boson sampling with single-photon states in distinct input modes and arbitrary additional vacuum inputs, and to Gaussian boson sampling with equal squeezing of bounded strength in every input mode.

Why it matters

The authors argue that even small fixed uniform loss can undermine the computational-hardness motivation for boson-sampling experiments. In particular, scaling the mean detected photon number linearly with system size is not sufficient, by itself, to establish hardness.

Written by AI from the paper. Passages are checked word for word against the text we analysed; the rest may contain errors.

AI-generated keywords: boson sampling photon loss classical simulation Haar-random interferometers high-order correlations

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The paper asks whether boson sampling remains computationally hard when photons are lost. Boson sampling uses interference among photons in a linear optical network to generate output patterns that are believed to be difficult for classical computers to sample. Because real experiments inevitably lose photons, understanding how loss affects this proposed quantum advantage is important. The paper’s central result is that, under the conditions it studies, any fixed, nonzero uniform loss rate makes approximate classical sampling efficient on average over random interferometers as the system grows. The method takes advantage of the way loss weakens correlations among large numbers of photons. Instead of reproducing the full output distribution exactly, the authors approximate it using correlations of limited order. At a fixed loss rate, contributions involving many photons are sufficiently suppressed that a low-order approximation can achieve a desired total variation accuracy. The abstract states that the resulting classical samplers run in time polynomial in the system size and the inverse of the allowed total variation error. The guarantee is an average-case one: the error is averaged over Haar-random interferometers, rather than bounded for every individual interferometer. The result covers two commonly studied forms of boson sampling. For Fock-state boson sampling, it applies when single photons enter distinct input modes, with any number of additional vacuum inputs. For Gaussian boson sampling, it applies when every input mode has equal, bounded squeezing. In both settings, the loss rate must be nonzero and remain fixed as the system grows. The abstract provides no numerical loss threshold, specific squeezing bound, or detailed runtime exponent. An important implication is that a large detected photon number does not, by itself, establish computational hardness. The efficient classical sampling result still holds in regimes where the mean number of detected photons grows linearly with system size. Thus, photon counts that increase proportionally with an experiment’s size are not sufficient evidence that loss has made the output distribution difficult to simulate classically. The relevant question is not only how many photons survive, but also whether substantial high-order correlations remain. The conclusion is conditional, not a blanket statement about all optical sampling proposals or loss models. The abstract establishes an average-case approximation result for uniform loss that remains fixed with system size and for the specified input families. It does not show that every instance is efficiently simulable, that exact sampling is efficient, or that the same conclusion holds when loss decreases as the system grows, varies across modes, or falls outside the stated input assumptions. The available source contains only the title and abstract, so details such as the precise approximation construction, parameter dependence, and proof assumptions cannot be assessed.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 1 free rewrite left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Weekly letter Presented in "Quantum physics this week" of 9 November 2026. Quantum physics this week: Protecting fragile states, exposing fragile advantages

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close Same question Cited by this paper
    BosonSampling with Lost Photons
    S. Aaronson, D. Brod · 2015 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 85 times · Not summarized yet

    BosonSampling with Lost Photons studies how randomly losing source photons affects boson-sampling complexity and robustness.

    Abstract

    BosonSampling is an intermediate model of quantum computation where linear-optical networks are used to solve sampling problems expected to be hard for classical computers. Since these devices are not expected to be universal for quantum computation, it remains an open question of whether any error-correction techniques can be applied to them, and thus it is important to investigate how robust the model is under natural experimental imperfections, such as losses and imperfect control of parameters. Here we investigate the complexity of BosonSampling under photon losses---more specifically, the case where an unknown subset of the photons are randomly lost at the sources. We show that, if $k$ …

  2. Very close Same question Cited by this paper
    Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of BosonSampling under Any Constant-Fraction Photon Loss
    Byeong-Yoon Go, Hyunseok Jeong · 2026 · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet

    Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of BosonSampling under Any Constant-Fraction Photon Loss gives efficient classical sampling when a constant fraction of input photons survives.

    Abstract

    Understanding how photon loss changes the classical complexity of BosonSampling is central to assessing the robustness of near-term photonic quantum advantage. In this work, we present a polynomial-time classical simulation algorithm for lossy BosonSampling that applies whenever a constant fraction of the input photons survives. We consider the standard fixed-loss model, where $N$ input photons propagate through an $M$-mode interferometer and exactly $N-n$ photons are lost uniformly at random, leaving $n$ surviving photons at the output. For any constant surviving fraction $n/N\in(0,1)$, the algorithm samples from a distribution within total variation distance $\varepsilon$ of the fixed-loss…

  3. Very close Another approach to the problem Cited by this paper
    Classical Simulation of Lossy Gaussian Boson Sampling beyond Square-Root Regime
    Youngrong Lim · 2026 · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet

    Classical Simulation of Lossy Gaussian Boson Sampling beyond Square-Root Regime simulates lossy Gaussian boson sampling by approximating detection rather than replacing the input with classical light.

    Abstract

    Photon loss makes Gaussian boson sampling easier to simulate classically. A standard approach replaces the lossy input by classical light, and it stays accurate while the mean number of surviving photons grows no faster than the square root of the number $N$ of squeezed inputs at fixed squeezing and accuracy. We prove that this scale is a limit of replacement by classical light. For explicit interferometers, no state with a nonnegative Glauber--Sudarshan $P$ representation, Gaussian or not and however correlated, keeps the error in the photon count distribution small beyond this scale. We then surpass this limit by approximating the detection instead of the input. The sampler evolves the sta…

  4. Very close Another approach to the problem Cited by this paper
    Simulating boson sampling in lossy architectures
    R. García-Patrón, J. Renema, V. Shchesnovich · 2017 · Quantum · cited 126 times · Not summarized yet

    Simulating boson sampling in lossy architectures uses thermal-noise or tensor-network simulation for circuits with transmission that decays exponentially with depth.

    Abstract

    Photon losses are among the strongest imperfections affecting multi-photon interference. Despite their importance, little is known about their effect on boson sampling experiments. In this work we show that using classical computers, one can efficiently simulate multi-photon interference in all architectures that suffer from an exponential decay of the transmission with the depth of the circuit, such as integrated photonic circuits or optical fibers. We prove that either the depth of the circuit is large enough that it can be simulated by thermal noise with an algorithm running in polynomial time, or it is shallow enough that a tensor network simulation runs in quasi-polynomial time. This re…

  5. Very close Same question
    Polynomial-time classical simulation of boson and fermion sampling under thermal loss
    Armando Angrisani, Hela Mhiri · 2026 · Not summarized yet

    Polynomial-time classical simulation of boson and fermion sampling under thermal loss proves efficient sampling for lossy Fock-state and Gaussian boson sampling.

    Abstract

    Sampling experiments are a leading approach to demonstrating quantum computational advantage, yet their robustness to experimental noise is not completely understood. We develop a common framework for classical simulation of boson and fermion sampling under thermal loss, including pure loss. For Fock-state boson sampling, Gaussian boson sampling with fixed uniform squeezing, and fermion sampling with magic inputs, we obtain polynomial-time sampling at inverse-polynomial total variation error, for any fixed nonzero overall loss rate, and with high probability over Haar-random interferometers. A milder flatness assumption on the ideal output distribution suffices for quasipolynomial-time simul…

  6. Very close Broader context
    Scalability and performance metrics for boson sampling devices
    Dong-Gil Im, Chung-Hyun Lee, Joonsuk Huh et al. · 2026 · Not summarized yet

    Scalability and performance metrics for boson sampling devices examines how loss and other experimental constraints affect scalable quantum advantage.

    Abstract

    Linear-optical platforms provide a promising route to demonstrate quantum computational advantage, particularly through the boson sampling problem. While a boson sampling system should be large enough to show the quantum advantage, the size of the boson sampling problem is often restricted by experimental constraints. In particular, as a boson sampling system is scaled up, experimental constraints can limit its effective problem size to permit efficient classical simulation. In this paper, we investigate the theoretical scalability bounds for boson sampling systems under practical experimental conditions, including photon loss, mode mismatch, and input state error. We employ non-negativity c…

  7. Very close Different results Cited by this paper Used in depth by this paper
    Sufficient conditions for hardness of lossy Gaussian boson sampling
    Byeong-Yoon Go, Changhun Oh, Hyunseok Jeong · 2025 · cited 6 times · Not summarized yet

    Sufficient conditions for hardness of lossy Gaussian boson sampling argues GBS remains intractable when at most a logarithmic fraction of photons is lost, unlike fixed-rate loss here.

    Abstract

    Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is a prominent candidate for the experimental demonstration of quantum advantage. However, while the current implementations of GBS are unavoidably subject to noise, the robustness of the classical intractability of GBS against noise remains largely unexplored. In this work, we establish the complexity-theoretic foundations for the classical intractability of noisy GBS under photon loss, which is a dominant source of imperfection in current implementations. We identify the loss threshold below which lossy GBS maintains the same complexity-theoretic level as ideal GBS, and show that this holds when at most a logarithmic fraction of photons is lost. We additionall…

  8. Very close Broader context Cited by this paper
    Quantum Computational Advantage of Noisy Boson Sampling with Partially Distinguishable Photons
    Byeong-Yoon Go, Changhun Oh, Hyunseok Jeong · 2025 · PRX Quantum · cited 11 times · Not summarized yet

    Quantum Computational Advantage of Noisy Boson Sampling with Partially Distinguishable Photons identifies noise levels preserving hardness under partial distinguishability rather than photon loss.

    Abstract

    Boson sampling stands out as a promising approach toward experimental demonstration of quantum computational advantage. However, the presence of physical noise in near-term experiments hinders the realization of quantum computational advantage with boson sampling. Since physical noise in near-term boson-sampling devices is inevitable, precise characterization of the boundary of noise rates where the classical intractability of boson sampling is maintained is crucial for quantum computational advantage using near-term devices. In this work, we identify the level of partial-distinguishability noise that upholds the classical intractability of boson sampling. We find that boson sampling with on…

Prior work it builds on

  1. Very close Broader context Used in depth by this paper
    Gaussian boson sampling with 1,024 squeezed states in 8,176 modes
    Hua-Liang Liu, Hao-Ru Su, Yu-Hao Deng et al. · 2026 · Nature · cited 30 times · Not summarized yet

    Gaussian boson sampling with 1,024 squeezed states in 8,176 modes reports a large-scale photonic processor and addresses photon-loss limits on scalability.

    Abstract

    The development of large-scale, high-fidelity quantum processors is a fundamental scientific challenge, essential for exploring the boundaries of classical computation and advancing towards fault-tolerant systems. Gaussian boson sampling not only serves as a prominent model for demonstrating quantum computational advantage1, 2–3 but can also generate bosonic error-correcting codes for fault-tolerant quantum computing4, 5–6. However, its scalability has been hindered by significant photon loss in increasingly large and complex encoding circuits. Here we show a programmable photonic quantum processor, Jiuzhang 4.0, which incorporates 1,024 high-efficiency squeezed states into a hybrid spatial–…

  2. Very close Same question
    Classical simulation of photonic linear optics with lost particles
    Michał Oszmaniec, D. Brod · 2018 · New Journal of Physics · cited 119 times · Not summarized yet

    Classical simulation of photonic linear optics with lost particles studies efficient classical approximation of boson-sampling output statistics under particle loss.

    Abstract

    We explore the possibility of efficient classical simulation of linear optics experiments under the effect of particle losses. Specifically, we investigate the canonical boson sampling scenario in which an n-particle Fock input state propagates through a linear-optical network and is subsequently measured by particle-number detectors in the m output modes. We examine two models of losses. In the first model a fixed number of particles is lost. We prove that in this scenario the output statistics can be well approximated by an efficient classical simulation, provided that the number of photons that is left grows slower than n . In the second loss model, every time a photon passes through a be…

  3. Very close Same question
    Regimes of Classical Simulability for Noisy Gaussian Boson Sampling.
    Hao-Yu Qi, D. Brod, N. Quesada et al. · 2019 · Physical Review Letters · cited 92 times · Not summarized yet

    Regimes of Classical Simulability for Noisy Gaussian Boson Sampling gives a condition for efficient simulation of noisy GBS based on squeezing, transmission, and detector quality.

    Abstract

    As a promising candidate for exhibiting quantum computational supremacy, Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is designed to exploit the ease of experimental preparation of Gaussian states. However, sufficiently large and inevitable experimental noise might render GBS classically simulable. In this work, we formalize this intuition by establishing a sufficient condition for approximate polynomial-time classical simulation of noisy GBS-in the form of an inequality between the input squeezing parameter, the overall transmission rate, and the quality of photon detectors. Our result serves as a nonclassicality test that must be passed by any quantum computational supremacy demonstration based on GBS. W…

  4. Close Broader context
    Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling
    A. Deshpande, Arthur Mehta, Trevor Vincent et al. · 2021 · Science Advances · cited 135 times · Not summarized yet

    Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling reports a fiber-optic quantum computer outperforming classical computers.

    Abstract

    A programmable quantum computer based on fiber optics outperforms classical computers with a high level of confidence.

  5. Close Groundwork for this paper
    Gaussian Boson sampling
    C. Hamilton, R. Kruse, L. Sansoni et al. · 2016 · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · cited 542 times · Not summarized yet

    Gaussian Boson sampling presents the squeezed-state protocol and Hafnian-based sampling framework used by the paper's Gaussian boson-sampling setting.

    Abstract

    We present the protocol for Gaussian Boson Sampling with single-mode squeezed states. We eliminate heralding and show that our proposal with the Hafnian matrix function can retain the higher photon number contributions at the input.

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

Updated on 10 November 2026.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.