AI summary · arXiv: 2504.05065v1 · cs.LO

Quantitative Supermartingale Certificates

Alessandro Abate, Mirco Giacobbe, Diptarko Roy

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 07 Apr. 2025 To appear at CAV'25 License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Alessandro Abate, Mirco Giacobbe, and Diptarko Roy introduce a novel methodology for quantitative model checking and control synthesis using supermartingale certificates.
  • The authors demonstrate that every specification invariant to time shifts possesses a stochastic invariant that provides a lower bound on its probability.
  • This result allows for the extension of certificates ensuring almost-sure satisfaction of shift-invariant specifications to their quantitative counterparts.
  • The approach unifies existing supermartingale certificates for quantitative verification and control under various specifications such as reachability, safety, reach-avoidance, stability, as well as asymptotic bounds on costs and rewards.
  • The paper presents the first supermartingale certificate for determining upper and lower bounds on the probability of satisfying $\omega$-regular and linear temporal logic specifications.
  • An algorithm for quantitative $\omega$-regular verification and control synthesis is proposed based on this method, showcasing its practical efficacy through applications to several infinite-state examples.
  • The authors highlight the limitations of current techniques in handling probabilistic systems with countably infinite or continuous state spaces commonly found in probabilistic programs, control systems, and machine learning models.
  • They emphasize the need for automated verification and control methods tailored to these complex systems through either finite abstractions grounded in concurrency theory or novel algorithmic approaches yet to be developed.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Quantitative Supermartingale Certificates

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper "Quantitative Supermartingale Certificates," Alessandro Abate, Mirco Giacobbe, and Diptarko Roy introduce a novel methodology for quantitative model checking and control synthesis using supermartingale certificates. The authors demonstrate that every specification invariant to time shifts possesses a stochastic invariant that provides a lower bound on its probability. This groundbreaking result allows for the extension of certificates ensuring almost-sure satisfaction of shift-invariant specifications to their quantitative counterparts. Their approach unifies existing supermartingale certificates for quantitative verification and control under various specifications such as reachability, safety, reach-avoidance, stability, as well as asymptotic bounds on costs and rewards. Additionally, the paper presents the first supermartingale certificate for determining upper and lower bounds on the probability of satisfying $\omega$-regular and linear temporal logic specifications. An algorithm for quantitative $\omega$-regular verification and control synthesis is proposed based on this method, showcasing its practical efficacy through applications to several infinite-state examples. The authors highlight the limitations of current techniques in handling probabilistic systems with countably infinite or continuous state spaces commonly found in probabilistic programs, control systems, and machine learning models. They emphasize the need for automated verification and control methods tailored to these complex systems through either finite abstractions grounded in concurrency theory or novel algorithmic approaches yet to be developed.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.