Résumé IA · arXiv: 2205.00445v1 · cs.CL
MRKL Systems: A modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoning
Posez des questions sur cet article à notre assistant IA
Comment discuter avec cet article ? Guide illustré
Vous pouvez aussi discutez avec plusieurs papiers à la fois ici.
Gardez cette conversation — un compte gratuit conserve vos questions et réponses, vos collections d’articles et vos alertes.
Continuer avec Google Créer un compte gratuitOutils pour cet article
Outils avancés Premium
Pour suivre un domaine de près : alertes de citations, diapositives de journal club, comparaison des versions et envoi vers Zotero. Découvrir Premium
Les articles autour de celui-ci
Les voir sur une carteClassés selon la proximité de leur titre et de leur résumé avec ceux de cet article. Sélectionnez-en pour les lire ensemble.
Les articles les plus proches
-
Formal Knowledge Augmented Language Models for Explainable and Robust ReasoningNgoc-Khuong Nguyen, Viet-Ha Nguyen, Anh-Cuong Le · 2025 · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · cité 1 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at many tasks but often struggle with complex, multi-step reasoning, leading to inconsistencies and hallucinations. Consequently, we propose a neural-symbolic integration framework that enhances LLM reasoning by incorporating formal knowledge—such as logical rules, ontologies, and knowledge graphs—into their CoT process. Our approach retrieves and integrates symbolic information to guide logical inference, resulting in more accurate and interpretable outputs. Experiments on compositional reasoning benchmarks demonstrate significant improvements over standard LLM methods. This work highlights the potential of neural-symbolic integration for developing more r…
-
Complex Reasoning over Vision and Language -Leveraging Neurosymbolic AIParisa Kordjamshidi · 2026 · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Recent research highlights the lack of reliability of large language models (LLMs) in tasks requiring complex reasoning. While they can produce impressively fluent text in response to prompts, they can fail on basic reasoning skills, such as recognizing that left is the opposite of right. They struggle even more with grounding such concepts in real-world contexts involving perception and action. Addressing real-world problems, however, typically requires models composed of multiple interdependent learners, with strong capabilities for composition and reasoning. In this talk, I will discuss the reasoning challenges of LLMs and discuss how symbolic representations can enhance neural models by …
-
Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Towards Improving the Reasoning Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiao-Wen Yang, Jiejing Shao, Lan-Zhe Guo et al. · 2024 · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · cité 42 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results across various tasks, yet their reasoning capabilities remain a fundamental challenge. Developing AI systems with strong reasoning capabilities is regarded as a crucial milestone in the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and has garnered considerable attention from both academia and industry. Various techniques have been explored to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, with neuro-symbolic approaches being a particularly promising way. This paper comprehensively reviews recent developments in neuro-symbolic approaches for enhancing LLM reasoning. We first present a formalization of reasoning tasks and give a brief …
-
Reasoning Language Models: A BlueprintMaciej Besta, Julia Barth, Eric Schreiber et al. · 2025 · Artificial Intelligence · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 51 fois · Résumé IA disponible
Résumé scientifique
Reasoning language models (RLMs), also known as Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), such as OpenAI's o1 and o3, DeepSeek-V3, and Alibaba's QwQ, have redefined AI's problem-solving capabilities by extending large language models (LLMs) with advanced reasoning mechanisms. Yet, their high costs, proprietary nature, and complex architectures - uniquely combining Reinforcement Learning (RL), search heuristics, and LLMs - present accessibility and scalability challenges. To address these, we propose a comprehensive blueprint that organizes RLM components into a modular framework, based on a survey and analysis of all RLM works. This blueprint incorporates diverse reasoning structures (chains, trees, gr…
-
Bridging Knowledge and Reasoning: The Role of Large Language Models in AI EvolutionManish Gupta, Dibyahash Bordoloi, Peraschi Selvan Subramanian et al. · 2026 · 2026 2nd International Conference on Big Data & Machine Learning (ICBDML) · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Large Language Models, which unify large knowledge representation with sophisticated reasoning capability, would continue to drive the rapid development of artificial intelligence. These models go beyond pattern recognition and combine contextual knowledge, factual basis and adaptability to problems. The new paradigm puts language as the connecting point of both humans-like thinking and machine learning and allows systems to acquire intent and form relationships and come up with consistent insights, cross-domain. Greater architectural sophistication, multi- modal learning and learning with auditory devices enhance a stronger alignment between learning and logical inference. With the ongoing …
-
Advancing Symbolic Integration in Large Language Models: Beyond Conventional Neurosymbolic AIManeeha Rani, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra, Dhavalkumar Thakker · 2025 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 2 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
LLMs have demonstrated highly effective learning, human-like response generation,and decision-making capabilities in high-risk sectors. However, these models remain black boxes because they struggle to ensure transparency in responses. The literature has explored numerous approaches to address transparency challenges in LLMs, including Neurosymbolic AI (NeSy AI). NeSy AI approaches were primarily developed for conventional neural networks and are not well-suited to the unique features of LLMs. Consequently, there is a limited systematic understanding of how symbolic AI can be effectively integrated into LLMs. This paper aims to address this gap by first reviewing established NeSy AI methods …
-
Large Language Models, Limitations and Capabilities: Musings from a Logician’s viewpointVaishak Belle · 2025 · Ezumezu: African Perspectives on Logic, Transhumanism and AI Ethics · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Here, we informally review the logical reasoning abilities of large language models, and how that seems to suggest that these models are neither deep thinkers nor an existential threat, in the sense of a rogue autonomous agent. Sample conversations are included to illustrate its shallowness. We conclude by arguing for the need to revert to well-established areas that unify logical reasoning and learning, such as statistical relational learning and neuro-symbolic AI, which enable frameworks for clear behavior specification. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of these proposed frameworks, and briefly consider how hybrid architectures that combine neural and symbolic approaches may …
-
Exploring the Reasoning Abilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs): A Comprehensive Survey on Emerging Trends in Multimodal ReasoningYi-Qin Wang, Wen-Tao Chen, Xiao-Tian Han et al. · 2024 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 188 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Strong Artificial Intelligence (Strong AI) or Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) with abstract reasoning ability is the goal of next-generation AI. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), along with the emerging field of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of multimodal tasks and applications. Particularly, various MLLMs, each with distinct model architectures, training data, and training stages, have been evaluated across a broad range of MLLM benchmarks. These studies have, to varying degrees, revealed different aspects of the current capabilities of MLLMs. However, the reasoning abilities of MLLMs have not…
Les travaux antérieurs sur lesquels il s’appuie
-
Language Models as Knowledge Bases?F. Petroni, Tim Rocktäschel, Patrick Lewis et al. · 2019 · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · cité 3 418 fois · Résumé IA disponible
Résumé scientifique
Recent progress in pretraining language models on large textual corpora led to a surge of improvements for downstream NLP tasks. Whilst learning linguistic knowledge, these models may also be storing relational knowledge present in the training data, and may be able to answer queries structured as “fill-in-the-blank” cloze statements. Language models have many advantages over structured knowledge bases: they require no schema engineering, allow practitioners to query about an open class of relations, are easy to extend to more data, and require no human supervision to train. We present an in-depth analysis of the relational knowledge already present (without fine-tuning) in a wide range of s…
-
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation ModelsRishi Bommasani, Drew A. Hudson, E. Adeli et al. · 2021 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 7 776 fois · Résumé IA disponible
Résumé scientifique
AI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models (e.g., BERT, DALL-E, GPT-3) that are trained on broad data at scale and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks. We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models, ranging from their capabilities (e.g., language, vision, robotics, reasoning, human interaction) and technical principles(e.g., model architectures, training procedures, data, systems, security, evaluation, theory) to their applications (e.g., law, healthcare, education) and societal impact (e.g., inequity, misuse, econo…
-
How Can We Know What Language Models Know?Zhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, J. Araki et al. · 2019 · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · cité 1 722 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Abstract Recent work has presented intriguing results examining the knowledge contained in language models (LMs) by having the LM fill in the blanks of prompts such as “Obama is a __ by profession”. These prompts are usually manually created, and quite possibly sub-optimal; another prompt such as “Obama worked as a __ ” may result in more accurately predicting the correct profession. Because of this, given an inappropriate prompt, we might fail to retrieve facts that the LM does know, and thus any given prompt only provides a lower bound estimate of the knowledge contained in an LM. In this paper, we attempt to more accurately estimate the knowledge contained in LMs by automatically discover…
-
Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language ModelShaden Smith, M. Patwary, Brandon Norick et al. · 2022 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 878 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Pretrained general-purpose language models can achieve state-of-the-art accuracies in various natural language processing domains by adapting to downstream tasks via zero-shot, few-shot and fine-tuning techniques. Because of their success, the size of these models has increased rapidly, requiring high-performance hardware, software, and algorithmic techniques to enable training such large models. As the result of a joint effort between Microsoft and NVIDIA, we present details on the training of the largest monolithic transformer based language model, Megatron-Turing NLG 530B (MT-NLG), with 530 billion parameters. In this paper, we first focus on the infrastructure as well as the 3D paralleli…
-
Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder et al. · 2020 · Neural Information Processing Systems · cité 66 244 fois · Résumé IA disponible
Résumé scientifique
Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Spec…
Les articles qui le citent
-
An In-depth Survey of Large Language Model-based Artificial Intelligence AgentsPengyu Zhao, Zijian Jin, Ning Cheng · 2023 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 55 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Due to the powerful capabilities demonstrated by large language model (LLM), there has been a recent surge in efforts to integrate them with AI agents to enhance their performance. In this paper, we have explored the core differences and characteristics between LLM-based AI agents and traditional AI agents. Specifically, we first compare the fundamental characteristics of these two types of agents, clarifying the significant advantages of LLM-based agents in handling natural language, knowledge storage, and reasoning capabilities. Subsequently, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the key components of AI agents, including planning, memory, and tool use. Particularly, for the crucial compone…
-
Exploring Large Language Model‐Based Intelligent Agents: Definitions, Methods, and ProspectsYu-Heng Cheng, Ceyao Zhang, Zheng-Wen Zhang et al. · 2024 · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · cité 243 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
The concept of the intelligent agent represents a long‐standing pursuit in artificial intelligence. Recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed a paradigm shift, enabling the development of sophisticated agents that exhibit advanced reasoning, planning, and tool‐use capabilities across diverse domains. These LLM‐based agents, which leverage natural language as a universal interface for cognition and interaction, are rapidly advancing from theoretical constructs to practical applications, ranging from autonomous task assistants to complex multi‐agent simulations of social and economic systems. This paper provides an integrative survey of this burgeoning field. We first…
-
Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and ChallengesJeff Z. Pan, Simon Razniewski, Jan-Christoph Kalo et al. · 2023 · TGDK · cité 172 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Large Language Models (LLMs) have taken Knowledge Representation -- and the world -- by storm. This inflection point marks a shift from explicit knowledge representation to a renewed focus on the hybrid representation of both explicit knowledge and parametric knowledge. In this position paper, we will discuss some of the common debate points within the community on LLMs (parametric knowledge) and Knowledge Graphs (explicit knowledge) and speculate on opportunities and visions that the renewed focus brings, as well as related research topics and challenges.
-
SoK: Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Taxonomy, Architectures, Evaluation, and Research DirectionsSaroj Mishra, Suman Niroula, Umesh Yadav et al. · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 14 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly evolving into agentic architectures where large language models autonomously coordinate multi-step reasoning, dynamic memory management, and iterative retrieval strategies. Despite rapid industrial adoption, current research lacks a systematic understanding of Agentic RAG as a sequential decision-making system, leading to highly fragmented architectures, inconsistent evaluation methodologies, and unresolved reliability risks. This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) paper provides the first unified framework for understanding these autonomous systems. We formalize agentic retrieval-generation loops as finite-horizon partially obser…
-
Architecting AgentOS: From Token-Level Context to Emergent System-Level IntelligenceCheng-You Li, Xiao-Dong Liu, Xiangbao Meng et al. · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · cité 3 fois · Pas encore résumé
Résumé scientifique
The paradigm of Large Language Models is undergoing a fundamental transition from static inference engines to dynamic autonomous cognitive systems.While current research primarily focuses on scaling context windows or optimizing prompt engineering the theoretical bridge between micro scale token processing and macro scale systemic intelligence remains fragmented.This paper proposes AgentOS,a holistic conceptual framework that redefines the LLM as a"Reasoning Kernel"governed by structured operating system logic.Central to this architecture is Deep Context Management which conceptualizes the context window as an Addressable Semantic Space rather than a passive buffer.We systematically deconstr…
Aller plus loin
Comment ces articles sont-ils trouvés ?
Nous comparons le titre et le résumé de cet article avec ceux de tous les articles résumés sur ce site, et avec les articles que Semantic Scholar recommande, ceux qu’il cite et ceux qui le citent (pour un article très cité, ses citations les plus récentes et, depuis OpenAlex, les plus citées). Parmi les travaux antérieurs et les suites, les articles qui s’utilisent en profondeur, une méthode qu’il utilise et les suites très citées remontent un peu. Les niveaux (très proche, proche, apparenté) viennent de la similarité des textes, pas d’un jugement de qualité ; * signale un article sans résumé, comparé par son titre. La phrase sous un article est écrite par une IA à partir des deux résumés : vérifiez-la dans les articles. Un article jugé hors sujet par trois lecteurs quitte la liste.
Mis à jour le 6 novembre 2026.
Le résumé précédent a été créé il y a plus d'un an et peut être réexécuté (si nécessaire) en cliquant sur le bouton Exécuter ci-dessous.
Avertissement : Notre outil de synthèse basé sur l'IA et l'assistant virtuel fournis sur ce site Web peuvent ne pas toujours fournir des résumés complets ou des réponses exactes. Nous vous encourageons à examiner attentivement et à évaluer le contenu généré pour vous assurer de sa qualité et de sa pertinence par rapport à vos besoins.