AI summary · arXiv: 2610.12208v1 · hep-ex

Evidence for Normal Neutrino Ordering with Combined Atmospheric Neutrino Experiments

Miaochen Jin, Carlos A. Argüelles, Pablo Fernández-Menéndez, Iván Martínez-Soler

Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 08 Oct. 2026 License: CC BY 4.0 Also in: fr

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

A joint atmospheric-neutrino analysis finds 3.3-sigma evidence for normal mass ordering and improves oscillation-parameter constraints by correlating shared uncertainties across three experiments.

Question

Can combined atmospheric-neutrino measurements determine the neutrino mass ordering and constrain atmospheric oscillation parameters and the CP-violating phase independently of accelerator experiments? How much does accounting for shared systematic uncertainties improve these constraints?

Method

The authors jointly fit Super-Kamiokande SK-I–V data covering 6511.3 live days, eight years of IceCube-DeepCore data, and 5828 ORCA6 events collected over 510 days. They use a binned Poisson likelihood, fully correlate atmospheric-flux and interaction-cross-section uncertainties across experiments, and treat detector uncertainties independently within the standard three-neutrino framework, fixing solar parameters and the reactor mixing angle. They calibrate the non-nested mass-ordering comparison using 1500 normal-ordering and 4397 inverted-ordering pseudoexperiments.

Findings

  • Result The combined fit favors normal ordering by a chi-squared difference of 11.0 and rejects inverted ordering at a calibrated one-sided significance of 3.3 sigma.
    See the passage in the paper
    Finally, comparing the orderings of the neutrino mass spectrum, we find a preference for the normal ordering with $\Delta\chi^{2}=11.0$; further calibrated with pseudoexperiments, we exclude the inverted ordering at $99.95\%$ confidence level ($3.3\sigma$).
  • Result The atmospheric mass splitting and mixing parameter are measured with relative precisions of 2.2% and 6.1%, respectively, while the mixing-angle octant remains unresolved.
    See the passage in the paper
    We measure atmospheric-sector precision competitive with accelerator experiments and independent of them, $\Delta m^{2}_{31}$ to $2.2\%$ and $\sin^{2}\theta_{23}$ to $6.1\%$, finding no preference for either octant (favors upper octant by $\Delta\chi^{2}=0.3$) with near-maximal mixing.
  • Result The atmospheric-only fit places the CP phase at 1.30π, with a one-sigma interval extending down by 0.28π and up by 0.24π, and disfavors values near 0.3π by more than 2.7 sigma.
    See the passage in the paper
    We find a best-fit value of $\delta_{\rm{CP}}=1.30\pi^{+0.24\pi}_{-0.28\pi}$, with values around $\delta_{\rm{CP}}=0.3\pi$ disfavored at more than $2.7\sigma$.
  • Result Correlating flux uncertainties narrows the one-sigma intervals for the mixing parameter and atmospheric mass splitting by 9% and 19%, respectively, relative to simply summing chi-squared functions.
    See the passage in the paper
    The correlated treatment of the flux uncertainties tightens the combined $1\sigma$ interval by $9\%$ in $\sin^{2}\theta_{23}$ and by $19\%$ in $\Delta m^{2}_{31}$ relative to a trivial $\chi^{2}$ sum.

Limitations

  • The ORCA6 energy-scale nuisance parameter is omitted because the public release does not model it, producing a narrower individual mass-splitting profile, although the authors report no significant combined-fit impact.
    See the passage in the paper
    This is due to the missing energy shift nuisance parameter, which is included in the ORCA official fit; it is however not modeled in the data release which includes only binned true and reconstructed energy information, whereas the energy shift parameter is a detector-response-level nuisance. This does not induce any significant impact on the combined fit.
  • Finite Monte Carlo statistics affect goodness-of-fit assessments, with the combined p-value increasing to 0.12 when these uncertainties are included.
    See the passage in the paper
    Including these uncertainties increases the goodness-of-fit p-values for both the individual experiments and the combined analysis. The combined goodness-of-fit then exhibits only mild tension, with (p=0.12), corresponding to a one-sided Gaussian significance of $1.18\sigma$.
  • The ordering-significance estimate has statistical uncertainty from the finite pseudoexperiment ensemble, and the alternative CLs criterion gives a lower one-sided significance of 2.55 sigma.
    See the passage in the paper
    The finite number of pseudoexperiments used to estimate the test statistics introduces a statistical uncertainty in the estimated $p$-values.

Why it matters

The authors argue that combined atmospheric data provide an independent witness for normal mass ordering and accelerator-competitive atmospheric-parameter measurements, with shared-systematics modeling providing measurable gains. They also identify complementary atmospheric and reactor mass-splitting measurements as a route to strengthening future ordering determinations.

Written by AI from the paper. Passages are checked word for word against the text we analysed; the rest may contain errors.

AI-generated keywords: Atmospheric neutrinos; Neutrino mass ordering; Neutrino oscillations; Joint analysis; Correlated systematic uncertainties

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper investigates whether combining atmospheric-neutrino measurements can determine the neutrino mass ordering and improve measurements of oscillation parameters. The central question is whether the third neutrino mass state is heavier than the other two, known as normal ordering, or lighter, known as inverted ordering. Atmospheric neutrinos provide an independent alternative to accelerator experiments because they span a broad range of energies and travel distances, including paths through Earth’s mantle and core. Matter effects along these paths produce distinct oscillation signatures for the two orderings. The authors jointly analyze Super-Kamiokande data from its five pre-gadolinium operating phases, eight years of IceCube-DeepCore data, and measurements from KM3NeT/ORCA’s initial six-detection-unit configuration, ORCA6. Super-Kamiokande contributes 6,511.3 live days and an exposure of 484.2 kiloton-years, while ORCA6 contributes 5,828 selected events collected over 510 days. The experiments offer complementary strengths: Super-Kamiokande provides detailed event classification and low-energy sensitivity, DeepCore supplies high statistics for measuring atmospheric oscillations, and ORCA6 adds an independent measurement extending to lower energies. The methodological advance is a simultaneous fit of event samples rather than a simple combination of published likelihoods. Atmospheric-flux and neutrino-interaction uncertainties are treated as fully correlated across experiments, while detector-response uncertainties remain independent. This approach allows data from one detector to constrain uncertainties affecting the others. The analysis uses a binned Poisson likelihood, numerical three-flavor neutrino propagation through an Earth-density model, and 143 nuisance parameters. Solar oscillation parameters and the reactor-measured mixing parameter sin²θ₁₃ are fixed. For Super-Kamiokande, the authors develop a high-statistics simulation tuned to released distributions and incorporate corrected energy information supplied by the collaboration. Assuming normal ordering, the combined fit yields an atmospheric mass-squared splitting of 2.44 × 10⁻³ eV², with uncertainties of +0.06 × 10⁻³ and −0.04 × 10⁻³ eV², corresponding to a reported relative precision of 2.2%. The mixing parameter sin²θ₂₃ is 0.52, with uncertainties of +0.03 and −0.04 and a reported precision of 6.1%. Maximal mixing remains allowed, and the preference for the upper octant is negligible, with a χ² difference of only 0.3. Compared with a simple likelihood combination, modeling shared systematic uncertainties narrows the mass-splitting and mixing-parameter intervals by 19% and 9%, respectively. The atmospheric-only constraint on the CP phase is 1.30π, with uncertainties of +0.24π and −0.28π. This sensitivity comes predominantly from Super-Kamiokande’s sub-GeV samples. Values near 0.3π are disfavored by more than 2.7 standard deviations, but the result does not constitute a definitive observation of CP violation. The main result is a χ² difference of 11.0 favoring normal ordering. Because the ordering hypotheses are non-nested, the authors calibrate the significance using simulated pseudoexperiments. Only two of 4,397 inverted-ordering trials produce results as extreme as the observed data, yielding a p-value of 0.000455, equivalent to approximately 3.32 standard deviations. Limited simulation statistics produce a 68% uncertainty range of 3.08–3.60 standard deviations, while the alternative CLs criterion yields a significance of 2.55 standard deviations. Important limitations include tension between experiments, finite Monte Carlo statistics, and the omission of an ORCA6 energy-scale uncertainty. The baseline combined goodness-of-fit p-value is 0.011, improving to approximately 0.12 in a study accounting for finite simulation statistics. The authors conclude that atmospheric data provide evidence, but not definitive proof, for normal ordering. They estimate that adding reactor information could bring the sensitivity close to four standard deviations, while emphasizing the need for a properly calibrated joint analysis.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Weekly letter Presented in "Particles, nuclei and gravitation this week" of 26 October 2026. Particles, nuclei and gravitation this week: Small effects, revealing tests
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.