AI summary · arXiv: 2610.12208v1 · hep-ex
Evidence for Normal Neutrino Ordering with Combined Atmospheric Neutrino Experiments
The essentials
A joint atmospheric-neutrino analysis finds 3.3-sigma evidence for normal mass ordering and improves oscillation-parameter constraints by correlating shared uncertainties across three experiments.
Question
Can combined atmospheric-neutrino measurements determine the neutrino mass ordering and constrain atmospheric oscillation parameters and the CP-violating phase independently of accelerator experiments? How much does accounting for shared systematic uncertainties improve these constraints?
Method
The authors jointly fit Super-Kamiokande SK-I–V data covering 6511.3 live days, eight years of IceCube-DeepCore data, and 5828 ORCA6 events collected over 510 days. They use a binned Poisson likelihood, fully correlate atmospheric-flux and interaction-cross-section uncertainties across experiments, and treat detector uncertainties independently within the standard three-neutrino framework, fixing solar parameters and the reactor mixing angle. They calibrate the non-nested mass-ordering comparison using 1500 normal-ordering and 4397 inverted-ordering pseudoexperiments.
Findings
-
Result
The combined fit favors normal ordering by a chi-squared difference of 11.0 and rejects inverted ordering at a calibrated one-sided significance of 3.3 sigma.
See the passage in the paper
Finally, comparing the orderings of the neutrino mass spectrum, we find a preference for the normal ordering with $\Delta\chi^{2}=11.0$; further calibrated with pseudoexperiments, we exclude the inverted ordering at $99.95\%$ confidence level ($3.3\sigma$).
-
Result
The atmospheric mass splitting and mixing parameter are measured with relative precisions of 2.2% and 6.1%, respectively, while the mixing-angle octant remains unresolved.
See the passage in the paper
We measure atmospheric-sector precision competitive with accelerator experiments and independent of them, $\Delta m^{2}_{31}$ to $2.2\%$ and $\sin^{2}\theta_{23}$ to $6.1\%$, finding no preference for either octant (favors upper octant by $\Delta\chi^{2}=0.3$) with near-maximal mixing.
-
Result
The atmospheric-only fit places the CP phase at 1.30π, with a one-sigma interval extending down by 0.28π and up by 0.24π, and disfavors values near 0.3π by more than 2.7 sigma.
See the passage in the paper
We find a best-fit value of $\delta_{\rm{CP}}=1.30\pi^{+0.24\pi}_{-0.28\pi}$, with values around $\delta_{\rm{CP}}=0.3\pi$ disfavored at more than $2.7\sigma$.
-
Result
Correlating flux uncertainties narrows the one-sigma intervals for the mixing parameter and atmospheric mass splitting by 9% and 19%, respectively, relative to simply summing chi-squared functions.
See the passage in the paper
The correlated treatment of the flux uncertainties tightens the combined $1\sigma$ interval by $9\%$ in $\sin^{2}\theta_{23}$ and by $19\%$ in $\Delta m^{2}_{31}$ relative to a trivial $\chi^{2}$ sum.
Limitations
- The ORCA6 energy-scale nuisance parameter is omitted because the public release does not model it, producing a narrower individual mass-splitting profile, although the authors report no significant combined-fit impact.
See the passage in the paper
This is due to the missing energy shift nuisance parameter, which is included in the ORCA official fit; it is however not modeled in the data release which includes only binned true and reconstructed energy information, whereas the energy shift parameter is a detector-response-level nuisance. This does not induce any significant impact on the combined fit.
- Finite Monte Carlo statistics affect goodness-of-fit assessments, with the combined p-value increasing to 0.12 when these uncertainties are included.
See the passage in the paper
Including these uncertainties increases the goodness-of-fit p-values for both the individual experiments and the combined analysis. The combined goodness-of-fit then exhibits only mild tension, with (p=0.12), corresponding to a one-sided Gaussian significance of $1.18\sigma$.
- The ordering-significance estimate has statistical uncertainty from the finite pseudoexperiment ensemble, and the alternative CLs criterion gives a lower one-sided significance of 2.55 sigma.
See the passage in the paper
The finite number of pseudoexperiments used to estimate the test statistics introduces a statistical uncertainty in the estimated $p$-values.
Why it matters
The authors argue that combined atmospheric data provide an independent witness for normal mass ordering and accelerator-competitive atmospheric-parameter measurements, with shared-systematics modeling providing measurable gains. They also identify complementary atmospheric and reactor mass-splitting measurements as a route to strengthening future ordering determinations.
Written by AI from the paper. Passages are checked word for word against the text we analysed; the rest may contain errors.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.