A real example: what you get

15 institutions, 30 people and 59 papers on “Exomoon Detection Methods”.

  • The landscape of the topic
  • 3 approaches, each named and described
  • 28 people who sign first, last or as corresponding author
  • 11 countries
  • Exports, a collection of the papers, a monthly follow-up
The landscape

The first approach emphasizes feasibility and observational constraints across multiple detection channels, the second concentrates on modeling photometric signals and interpreting timing variations, and the third emphasizes microlensing survey forecasts together with targeted imaging and transit searches. Astrometric methods seek changes in a planet’s measured position or wavelength-dependent centre of light, whereas transit methods seek moon-related light-curve structure or timing …

An approach

These papers assess exomoon searches through interferometric and relative astrometry, spectroastrometry, planetary radial velocities, simulated and observed transits, and mutual shadows or eclipses, while examining dynamical survival, instrumental sensitivity, transit-model flexibility, and systematic noise.

Multi-method Detectability and Constraints · 36 papers

The first results

  1. Columbia University US · 7 papers
  2. Academia Sinica TW · 8 papers
  3. Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica TW · 8 papers
  4. Leiden Observatory NL · 7 papers
  5. Leiden University NL · 7 papers
  6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology US · 12 papers
  7. Delft University of Technology NL · 5 papers
  8. University of Arizona US · 6 papers
  9. University of California, Berkeley US · 4 papers
  10. Peking University CN · 3 papers

5 more results hidden

See a complete example, explained step by step →

Create a free account: your first search with this tool is free, its first results shown in full. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

The whole result, as its owner would share it →

Other examples · Astrophysics

Every example →