The close papers a draft on “Observing Planetary Gaps in the Gas of Debris Disks” does not cite

A real example: what you get

30 close papers the draft does not cite, 8 that a referee would expect.

• Where to cite each one, section by section
• How to position your work against each one
• What each one is to your draft: same question, competing method, earlier result, data...
• 19 papers probably already in your references, matched for you
• 319 papers screened in journals and preprints

The first results

1. OBSERVATIONAL SIGNATURES OF PLANETS IN PROTOPLANETARY DISKS. I. GAPS OPENED BY SINGLE AND MULTIPLE YOUNG PLANETS IN DISKS Ruobing Dong, Zhaohuan Zhu, Barbara A. Whitney · 2015 This study connects planet-driven hydrodynamical structures to synthetic observations through radiative transfer, anticipating the draft's modelling strategy. It addresses dust signatures in protoplanetary disks rather than CO signatures in debris disks.
2. Ringed Structures of the HD 163296 Protoplanetary Disk Revealed by ALMA Andrea Isella, Greta Guidi, L. Testi, Shang-Fei Liu, Hui Li et al. · 2016 These observations directly illustrate the contrast between conspicuous dust gaps and subtler CO signatures in a protoplanetary disk. Model-inferred gas depletion also supports the planetary interpretation that motivates the draft's comparison.
3. Observability of planet–disc interactions in CO kinematics Sebastian Perez M., Simón Casassus, Pablo Benítez-Llambay · 2018 This paper directly predicts the observability of planet-driven CO kinematic perturbations using hydrodynamics and radiative transfer. It is a close precursor to the draft's kink analysis, although it treats gas-rich disks and emphasizes velocity-centroid maps.
4. A New Planet Candidate Detected in a Dust Gap of the Disk around HD 163296 through Localized Kinematic Signatures: An Observational Validation of the discminer Andrés F. Izquierdo, Stefano Facchini, Giovanni P. Rosotti, Ewine F. van Dishoeck, L. Testi · 2022 This study reports localized CO velocity perturbations interpreted as giant-planet signatures and identifies gas gaps through line widths. It supplies observational precedent for the indirect planet-detection strategy discussed in the draft.
5. PLANET FORMATION SIGNPOSTS: OBSERVABILITY OF CIRCUMPLANETARY DISKS VIA GAS KINEMATICS Sebastian Perez, A. Dunhill, Simón Casassus, P. Roman, J. Szulágyi et al. · 2015 This paper combines hydrodynamics, CO radiative transfer, and realistic ALMA noise to predict planet-related kinematic observables. Its circumplanetary-disk signatures provide an important precursor, but do not address debris-disk gaps.
6. Vertical Structure of Gas and Dust in Four Debris Disks Kadin Worthen, Christine H. Chen, Sean Brittain, Cicero Lu, Isabel Rebollido et al. · 2023 This study constrains CO scale heights in gas-bearing debris disks, directly informing the vertical structure assumed in the draft's radiative-transfer calculations. Its discussion of photodissociation and mixing is relevant to assessing a hydrostatic extrapolation.
7. New constraints on turbulence and embedded planet mass in the HD 163296 disk from planet-disk hydrodynamic simulations Shang-Fei Liu, Sheng Jin, Shengtai Li, Andrea Isella, Hui Li · 2018 This study uses hydrodynamics and radiative transfer to interpret both dust gaps and CO depletion in terms of embedded planets. It is a close methodological and physical precedent for connecting planetary clearing to molecular emission.
8. Radial Surface Density Profiles of Gas and Dust in the Debris Disk around 49 Ceti A. Meredith Hughes, Jesse Lieman-Sifry, Kevin Flaherty, C. Daley, Aki Roberge et al. · 2017 The resolved CO observations of 49 Ceti reveal nonaxisymmetric residuals potentially indicating spiral arms or a warp in debris-disk gas. They are directly relevant observational precedents for the gas structures whose planetary origin and detectability the draft models.
9. Multiple Disk Gaps and Rings Generated by a Single Super-Earth Ruobing Dong, Shengtai Li, Eugene Chiang, Hui Li · 2017 The paper predicts observable dust rings and gaps generated by low-mass planets, illustrating that gap morphology need not map simply onto planet number. Its low-viscosity protoplanetary setting differs from the draft's giant planets in debris-disk gas.
10. Debris Disks: Structure, Composition, and Variability A. Meredith Hughes, Gaspard Duchêne, Brenda C. Matthews · 2018 This review supplies background on debris disks, their gas content, and their use as indirect probes of planetary architectures. It provides context rather than a competing prediction of CO gap detectability.

20 more results hidden

See a complete example, explained step by step →