A real example: what you get
5 papers compared on 5 columns.
- Columns: Question, Method, Data, Main results, Limitations
- 25 of the 25 cells with their passage of the paper
- 3 points where they agree
- 4 points where they disagree
- 5 questions none of them addresses
- Cells you correct by hand, CSV export, a chat with the papers
Where the papers disagree
The simulation studies forecast different kinds of observational gains. Simulated Gaia DR5 joint fits reduce uncertainties in period, conjunction time, and radial-velocity amplitude by about 10%, 25%, and 33%, respectively; recovering a simulated equatorial-jet signature requires about three times the observed signal-to-noise ratio. Neither result constitutes an observed detection of the forecast improvement.
The first results
-
Combining TTVs, RVs, and astrometry to characterize distant giant companions of transiting hot Jupiters: Application to WASP-4
Question: Characterize the distant giant companion WASP-4 c and determine whether the transit-timing behavior of WASP-4 b indicates orbital decay.
-
The COBREX archival survey: improved constraints on the occurrence rate of wide-orbit substellar companions. I. A uniform re-analysis of 400 stars from the GPIES survey
Question: Improve direct-imaging sensitivity and constrain the occurrence of wide-orbit giant planets and brown dwarf companions through a uniform archival reanalysis.
-
A Model to Map Brown Dwarf Companions to White Dwarfs in Partial Secondary Eclipse
Question: Determine whether partial secondary eclipses can reveal spatial emission patterns on brown dwarf companions to white dwarfs, including latitude-dependent atmospheric circulation.
-
Expanding the Volatile Abundance Inventory for High-Priority K-Dwarf JWST Exoplanet Systems
Question: Measure carbon and oxygen elemental and isotopic abundances in six K-dwarf exoplanet hosts to establish chemical reference points for planetary atmospheric studies.
-
The anomalously large transiting planet around Boyajian's star: evidence for a circumplanetary ring
Question: Test whether a circumplanetary ring can explain the apparently oversized giant-planet candidate around Boyajian’s star without requiring an anomalously large planetary radius.
See a complete example, explained step by step →
The whole result, as its owner would share it →