A real example: what you get
All 5 references have a problem to fix or check; in 1 sentence, the cited paper may not say what it is cited for.
- Retracted (1)
- Correction published (1)
- Expression of concern (1)
- Reference to correct (1)
- 4 corrected BibTeX entries, ready to paste
- 4 citations checked against the papers they cite
- 1 cited key missing from the .bib
- A follow-up of your references until your paper is published
A citation the cited paper contradicts
The shadow of the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way was first imaged with ALMA alone [eht2022].
→ The paper attributes the observations to a global array of eight telescopes, not ALMA alone.
Its source
These observations were conducted in 2017 using a global interferometric array of eight telescopes operating at a wavelength of λ = 1.3 mm.
— First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in …
A corrected entry
year: 2016 → 2017 · doi: + 10.1093/mnras/stx730
kral2017
The first results
-
snider2020 · Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride
Retracted, Correction published, Expression of concern
-
kral2017 · Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals
Reference to correct
-
kral2017b · Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals
Duplicate, Incomplete entry
-
eht2022 · First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way
Final publication available
-
marino2016 · Exocometary gas in the HD 181327 debris ring
Incomplete entry
Measured in November 2026 on 52 citations annotated by hand: no false alarm and no miss, in English and French. An easy test set, which does not replace a check on your own manuscript.
See a complete example, explained step by step →
The whole result, as its owner would share it →
