AI summary · arXiv: 2307.00184v1 · cs.CL

Personality Traits in Large Language Models

Mustafa Safdari, Greg Serapio-García, Clément Crepy, Stephen Fitz, Peter Romero, Luning Sun, Marwa Abdulhai, Aleksandra Faust,
and 1 more authorMaja Matarić
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jul. 2023 License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Impact of large language models (LLMs) on natural language processing and conversational agents
  • Importance of personality in communication
  • Method for administering psychometric tests to quantify and analyze personality traits exhibited in LLM-generated text
  • Simulated personality in some LLM outputs is reliable and valid, especially for larger models with instruction fine-tuning
  • Personality in LLM outputs can be shaped to mimic specific profiles
  • Potential applications and ethical implications of the measurement and shaping framework
  • Overview of LLMs as large-capacity machine learning models for generating coherent and contextually relevant text
  • Learning process of LLMs from various datasets including web examples, instruction datasets, and preference fine-tuning
  • Previous attempts to probe personality traits in LLMs lacking rigor compared to standard quantitative social sciences practices
  • Psychometrics-grounded construct validity when administering personality inventories to LLMs
  • Evaluation and shaping methodology for personalities in LLM outputs using validated psychometric tests and prompt structures
  • Reliable and valid simulated personalities in some LLM outputs under specific prompting configurations, stronger evidence for larger models with instruction fine-tuning
  • Shaping personality dimensions to mimic specific profiles
  • Potential applications and ethical considerations of the measurement and shaping framework
  • Responsible use of LLMs emphasized throughout the paper

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Natural Language Processing Psychometric Tests Personality Traits Shapeability

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper discusses the impact of large language models (LLMs) on natural language processing and conversational agents. The authors highlight the importance of personality in communication and present a comprehensive method for administering psychometric tests to quantify and analyze personality traits exhibited in text generated by LLMs. They find that the simulated personality in some LLM outputs is reliable and valid, especially for larger models that have undergone instruction fine-tuning. Additionally, they demonstrate that personality in LLM outputs can be shaped to mimic specific profiles. The authors also discuss potential applications and ethical implications of their measurement and shaping framework, emphasizing responsible use of LLMs. In the introduction, the authors provide an overview of LLMs as large-capacity machine learning models that generate coherent and contextually relevant text. They explain how LLMs have revolutionized natural language processing and meet key requirements for human-like conversation. The authors mention that LLMs learn from large datasets of text from various sources including web examples "in context," instruction datasets, and preference fine-tuning. The related work section discusses previous attempts to probe personality traits in LLMs. While some studies suggest that certain models exhibit dark personality patterns or administer personality inventories to LLMs, the rigor in evaluating these results has been limited compared to standard quantitative social sciences practices. In contrast, this paper aims to establish psychometrics-grounded construct validity when administering personality inventories to LLMs. The methodology section provides details on the evaluation and shaping of personalities in LLM outputs. The authors describe their approach for administering validated psychometric tests to measure personality traits exhibited in generated text. They also outline prompt structures used for evaluation purposes. The findings section presents the results of their study. The authors report that simulated personalities in some LLM outputs are reliable and valid under specific prompting configurations with stronger evidence for larger models that have undergone instruction fine-tuning. Furthermore, they demonstrate that personality in LLM outputs can be shaped along desired dimensions to mimic specific profiles. The implications section discusses the potential applications and ethical considerations of the measurement and shaping framework developed by the authors. They emphasize responsible use of LLMs and highlight the need for further research on its ethical implications when using them to generate text with specific personalities. In conclusion, this paper presents a comprehensive method for administering psychometric tests to quantify and analyze personality traits exhibited in text generated by large language models (LLMs). The authors demonstrate reliability, validity, as well as shapeability of simulated personalities in such outputs while discussing potential applications as well as ethical implications associated with their framework - emphasizing responsible use thereof throughout their work..

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close
    PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
    Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in creating personalized chatbots, there has been limited research on evaluating the extent to which the behaviors of personalized LLMs accurately and consistently reflect specific personality traits. We consider studying the behavior of LLM-based agents which we refer to as LLM personas and present a case study with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to investigate whether LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality profiles. To this end, we simulate distinct LLM personas based on the Big Five personality model, have them complete the 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) personality test and a story writing task, and then asse…

  2. Very close
    Experiences Build Characters: The Linguistic Origins and Functional Impact of LLM Personality
    Xi Wang, Mengdie Zhuang, Jiqun Liu · 2026 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Human problem-solving is enriched by a diversity of styles and personality traits, yet the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has largely prioritized uniform performance benchmarks that favour specific behavioural tendencies such as assertiveness. To investigate how diverse experiences shape machine personality and influence problem-solving, this study employs continued pre-training to expose models to domain-specific texts in an unsupervised manner, simulating the accumulation of experience. By adapting the Big Five framework via the Machine Personality Inventory (MPI), we quantify the personality traits of these model variants and analyse their relationship to linguistic style and…

  3. Very close
    Quantifying AI Psychology: A Psychometrics Benchmark for Large Language Models
    Yuan Li, Yue Huang, Hongyi Wang et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional task-solving capabilities, increasingly adopting roles akin to human-like assistants. The broader integration of LLMs into society has sparked interest in whether they manifest psychological attributes, and whether these attributes are stable-inquiries that could deepen the understanding of their behaviors. Inspired by psychometrics, this paper presents a framework for investigating psychology in LLMs, including psychological dimension identification, assessment dataset curation, and assessment with results validation. Following this framework, we introduce a comprehensive psychometrics benchmark for LLMs that covers six psychologica…

  4. Very close
    LLM Agents in Interaction: Measuring Personality Consistency and Linguistic Alignment in Interacting Populations of Large Language Models
    Ivar Frisch, Mario Giulianelli · 2024 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    While both agent interaction and personalisation are vibrant topics in research on large language models (LLMs), there has been limited focus on the effect of language interaction on the behaviour of persona-conditioned LLM agents. Such an endeavour is important to ensure that agents remain consistent to their assigned traits yet are able to engage in open, naturalistic dialogues. In our experiments, we condition GPT-3.5 on personality profiles through prompting and create a two-group population of LLM agents using a simple variability-inducing sampling algorithm. We then administer personality tests and submit the agents to a collaborative writing task, finding that different profiles exhib…

  5. Very close
    Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playing
    Yunfan Shao, Linyang Li, Junqi Dai et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Large language models (LLMs) can be used to serve as agents to simulate human behaviors, given the powerful ability to understand human instructions and provide high-quality generated texts. Such ability stimulates us to wonder whether LLMs can simulate a person in a higher form than simple human behaviors. Therefore, we aim to train an agent with the profile, experience, and emotional states of a specific person instead of using limited prompts to instruct ChatGPT API. In this work, we introduce Character-LLM that teach LLMs to act as specific people such as Beethoven, Queen Cleopatra, Julius Caesar, etc. Our method focuses on editing profiles as experiences of a certain character and train…

  6. Very close
    Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation Framework
    Haocong Rao, Cyril Leung, Chunyan Miao · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Large Language Models (LLMs) especially ChatGPT have produced impressive results in various areas, but their potential human-like psychology is still largely unexplored. Existing works study the virtual personalities of LLMs but rarely explore the possibility of analyzing human personalities via LLMs. This paper presents a generic evaluation framework for LLMs to assess human personalities based on Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) tests. Specifically, we first devise unbiased prompts by randomly permuting options in MBTI questions and adopt the average testing result to encourage more impartial answer generation. Then, we propose to replace the subject in question statements to enable flex…

  7. Very close
    The Better Angels of Machine Personality: How Personality Relates to LLM Safety
    Jie Zhang, Dongrui Liu, Chen Qian et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Personality psychologists have analyzed the relationship between personality and safety behaviors in human society. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate personality traits, the relationship between personality traits and safety abilities in LLMs still remains a mystery. In this paper, we discover that LLMs' personality traits are closely related to their safety abilities, i.e., toxicity, privacy, and fairness, based on the reliable MBTI-M scale. Meanwhile, the safety alignment generally increases various LLMs' Extraversion, Sensing, and Judging traits. According to such findings, we can edit LLMs' personality traits and improve their safety performance, e.g., inducing personalit…

  8. Very close
    Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models
    Samuel R. Bowman · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The widespread public deployment of large language models (LLMs) in recent months has prompted a wave of new attention and engagement from advocates, policymakers, and scholars from many fields. This attention is a timely response to the many urgent questions that this technology raises, but it can sometimes miss important considerations. This paper surveys the evidence for eight potentially surprising such points: 1. LLMs predictably get more capable with increasing investment, even without targeted innovation. 2. Many important LLM behaviors emerge unpredictably as a byproduct of increasing investment. 3. LLMs often appear to learn and use representations of the outside world. 4. There are…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.