AI summary · arXiv: 2212.03551v5 · cs.CL

Talking About Large Language Models

Murray Shanahan
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 07 Dec. 2022 License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Large language models (LLMs) such as Bert and GPT-2 have transformed the field of AI
  • LLMs use transformer architectures comprising hundreds of billions of parameters and trained on massive amounts of textual data
  • The effectiveness of LLMs is surprising in three inter-related ways: their performance scales with the size of the training set, there are qualitative leaps in capability as the models scale, and a great many tasks that demand intelligence in humans can be reduced to next token prediction with a sufficiently performant model
  • As LLMs become more adept at mimicking human language, we become more vulnerable to anthropomorphism - seeing these systems as more human-like than they really are
  • To mitigate this trend, Murray Shanahan advocates for repeatedly stepping back to remind ourselves how LLMs actually work and how they form part of larger systems
  • It's important not to overestimate the abilities of LLMs or see them as fully autonomous entities capable of independent thought. Instead, we should view them as tools designed for specific purposes within larger systems that require careful consideration and ethical oversight.
  • The paper highlights the need for greater awareness around our use of language when discussing AI technologies like LLMs. By avoiding anthropomorphism and maintaining scientific precision in our discussions, we can foster a more nuanced understanding of these powerful tools while also ensuring responsible development and deployment practices going forward.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Language Models LLMs Anthropomorphism Nuance

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In recent years, the rapid progress in artificial intelligence has led to an intersection of technology and philosophy, with large language models (LLMs) at the center of this intersection. LLMs such as Bert and GPT-2 have transformed the field of AI by using transformer architectures comprising hundreds of billions of parameters and trained on massive amounts of textual data. The effectiveness of these models is surprising in three inter-related ways: their performance scales with the size of the training set, there are qualitative leaps in capability as the models scale, and a great many tasks that demand intelligence in humans can be reduced to next token prediction with a sufficiently performant model. However, as LLMs become more adept at mimicking human language, we become more vulnerable to anthropomorphism - seeing these systems as more human-like than they really are. This trend is amplified by our tendency to use philosophically loaded terms such as "knows," "believes," and "thinks" when describing these systems. To mitigate this trend, Murray Shanahan advocates for repeatedly stepping back to remind ourselves how LLMs actually work and how they form part of larger systems. The hope is that increased scientific precision will encourage more philosophical nuance in discussions around artificial intelligence both within the field and in public discourse. While LLMs have shown remarkable capabilities, it's important not to overestimate their abilities or see them as fully autonomous entities capable of independent thought. Instead, we should view them as tools designed for specific purposes within larger systems that require careful consideration and ethical oversight. Overall, this paper highlights the need for greater awareness around our use of language when discussing AI technologies like LLMs. By avoiding anthropomorphism and maintaining scientific precision in our discussions, we can foster a more nuanced understanding of these powerful tools while also ensuring responsible development and deployment practices going forward.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close
    Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models
    Samuel R. Bowman · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The widespread public deployment of large language models (LLMs) in recent months has prompted a wave of new attention and engagement from advocates, policymakers, and scholars from many fields. This attention is a timely response to the many urgent questions that this technology raises, but it can sometimes miss important considerations. This paper surveys the evidence for eight potentially surprising such points: 1. LLMs predictably get more capable with increasing investment, even without targeted innovation. 2. Many important LLM behaviors emerge unpredictably as a byproduct of increasing investment. 3. LLMs often appear to learn and use representations of the outside world. 4. There are…

  2. Very close
    Large Language Models and the Reverse Turing Test
    Terrence Sejnowski · 2022 · Neural Computation, 35, 309-342 (2023) · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have been transformative. They are pre-trained foundational models that are self-supervised and can be adapted with fine tuning to a wide range of natural language tasks, each of which previously would have required a separate network model. This is one step closer to the extraordinary versatility of human language. GPT-3 and more recently LaMDA can carry on dialogs with humans on many topics after minimal priming with a few examples. However, there has been a wide range of reactions and debate on whether these LLMs understand what they are saying or exhibit signs of intelligence. This high variance is exhibited in three interviews with LLMs reaching wildly diffe…

  3. Very close
    A Survey of Large Language Models
    Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Language is essentially a complex, intricate system of human expressions governed by grammatical rules. It poses a significant challenge to develop capable AI algorithms for comprehending and grasping a language. As a major approach, language modeling has been widely studied for language understanding and generation in the past two decades, evolving from statistical language models to neural language models. Recently, pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been proposed by pre-training Transformer models over large-scale corpora, showing strong capabilities in solving various NLP tasks. Since researchers have found that model scaling can lead to performance improvement, they further study t…

  4. Very close
    A Philosophical Introduction to Language Models -- Part I: Continuity With Classic Debates
    Raphaël Millière, Cameron Buckner · 2024 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Large language models like GPT-4 have achieved remarkable proficiency in a broad spectrum of language-based tasks, some of which are traditionally associated with hallmarks of human intelligence. This has prompted ongoing disagreements about the extent to which we can meaningfully ascribe any kind of linguistic or cognitive competence to language models. Such questions have deep philosophical roots, echoing longstanding debates about the status of artificial neural networks as cognitive models. This article -- the first part of two companion papers -- serves both as a primer on language models for philosophers, and as an opinionated survey of their significance in relation to classic debates…

  5. Very close
    A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitations
    Andrea Matarazzo, Riccardo Torlone · 2025 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, particularly with the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) built on the transformer architecture, has redefined the capabilities of natural language processing. These models now exhibit remarkable performance across various language-related tasks, such as text generation, question answering, translation, and summarization, often rivaling human-like comprehension. More intriguingly, LLMs have demonstrated emergent abilities extending beyond their core functions, showing proficiency in tasks like commonsense reasoning, code generation, and arithmetic. This survey paper explores the foundational components, scaling mechanisms, and archite…

  6. Very close
    First Tragedy, then Parse: History Repeats Itself in the New Era of Large Language Models
    Naomi Saphra, Eve Fleisig, Kyunghyun Cho et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Many NLP researchers are experiencing an existential crisis triggered by the astonishing success of ChatGPT and other systems based on large language models (LLMs). After such a disruptive change to our understanding of the field, what is left to do? Taking a historical lens, we look for guidance from the first era of LLMs, which began in 2005 with large $n$-gram models for machine translation. We identify durable lessons from the first era, and more importantly, we identify evergreen problems where NLP researchers can continue to make meaningful contributions in areas where LLMs are ascendant. Among these lessons, we discuss the primacy of hardware advancement in shaping the availability an…

  7. Very close
    Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models
    Chandan Singh, Jeevana Priya Inala, Michel Galley et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Interpretable machine learning has exploded as an area of interest over the last decade, sparked by the rise of increasingly large datasets and deep neural networks. Simultaneously, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks, offering a chance to rethink opportunities in interpretable machine learning. Notably, the capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. However, these new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs. In this position paper, we start by reviewing existing methods to evaluate…

  8. Very close
    A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models
    Humza Naveed, Asad Ullah Khan, Shi Qiu et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing tasks and beyond. This success of LLMs has led to a large influx of research contributions in this direction. These works encompass diverse topics such as architectural innovations, better training strategies, context length improvements, fine-tuning, multi-modal LLMs, robotics, datasets, benchmarking, efficiency, and more. With the rapid development of techniques and regular breakthroughs in LLM research, it has become considerably challenging to perceive the bigger picture of the advances in this direction. Considering the rapidly emerging plethora of literature on LLMs, it is imp…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.