AI summary · arXiv: 1905.11946v5 · cs.LG

EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks

Mingxing Tan, Quoc V. Le
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 28 May. 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019 ICML 2019 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Authors explore model scaling in Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets)
  • Current practice is to scale up for better accuracy if more resources become available
  • Authors propose a new scaling method that uniformly scales all dimensions of depth/width/resolution using a compound coefficient
  • This method is highly effective on MobileNets and ResNet models
  • Authors use neural architecture search to design a new baseline network which they scale up to obtain EfficientNets family of models
  • EfficientNets achieve much better accuracy and efficiency than previous ConvNets
  • EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet while being 8.4x smaller and 6.1x faster on inference than the best existing ConvNet
  • EfficientNets transfer well across datasets and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on CIFAR-100 (91.7%), Flowers (98.8%), and three other transfer learning datasets with an order of magnitude fewer parameters than previous models

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: EfficientNet Model Scaling Convolutional Neural Networks ImageNet Transfer Learning

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper "EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks," authors Mingxing Tan and Quoc V. Le explore the concept of model scaling in Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets). They note that ConvNets are often developed with a fixed resource budget and then scaled up for better accuracy if more resources become available. However, the authors argue that carefully balancing network depth, width, and resolution can lead to even better performance. To this end, they propose a new scaling method that uniformly scales all dimensions of depth/width/resolution using a compound coefficient. This method is demonstrated to be highly effective on MobileNets and ResNet models. The authors take things further by using neural architecture search to design a new baseline network which they scale up to obtain a family of models called EfficientNets. These models achieve much better accuracy and efficiency than previous ConvNets; their EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet while being 8.4x smaller and 6.1x faster on inference than the best existing ConvNet. Furthermore, the EfficientNets transfer well across datasets and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on CIFAR-100 (91.7%), Flowers (98.8%), and three other transfer learning datasets with an order of magnitude fewer parameters than previous models. Overall, the authors' work highlights the importance of careful model scaling in ConvNets and presents an effective new method for achieving improved performance while maintaining efficiency. Their EfficientNet models demonstrate significant improvements over previous state-of-the-art models across multiple datasets while requiring fewer parameters.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close
    On the Efficiency of Convolutional Neural Networks
    Andrew Lavin · 2024 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Since the breakthrough performance of AlexNet in 2012, convolutional neural networks (convnets) have grown into extremely powerful vision models. Deep learning researchers have used convnets to produce accurate results that were unachievable a decade ago. Yet computer scientists make computational efficiency their primary objective. Accuracy with exorbitant cost is not acceptable; an algorithm must also minimize its computational requirements. Confronted with the daunting computation that convnets use, deep learning researchers also became interested in efficiency. Researchers applied tremendous effort to find the convnet architectures that have the greatest efficiency. However, skepticism g…

  2. Close
    Efficiently Scaling Transformer Inference
    Reiner Pope, Sholto Douglas, Aakanksha Chowdhery et al. · 2022 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We study the problem of efficient generative inference for Transformer models, in one of its most challenging settings: large deep models, with tight latency targets and long sequence lengths. Better understanding of the engineering tradeoffs for inference for large Transformer-based models is important as use cases of these models are growing rapidly throughout application areas. We develop a simple analytical model for inference efficiency to select the best multi-dimensional partitioning techniques optimized for TPU v4 slices based on the application requirements. We combine these with a suite of low-level optimizations to achieve a new Pareto frontier on the latency and model FLOPS utili…

  3. Close
    SIFT: Sparse Iso-FLOP Transformations for Maximizing Training Efficiency
    Shreyas Saxena, Vithursan Thangarasa, Abhay Gupta et al. · 2023 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Recent works have explored the use of weight sparsity to improve the training efficiency (test accuracy w.r.t training FLOPs) of deep neural networks (DNNs). These works aim to reduce training FLOPs but training with sparse weights often leads to accuracy loss or requires longer train schedules, making the resulting training efficiency less clear. In contrast, we focus on using sparsity to increase accuracy while using the same FLOPS as the dense model and show training efficiency gains through higher accuracy. In this work, we introduce SIFT, a family of Sparse Iso-FLOP Transformations which are used as drop-in replacements for dense layers to improve their representational capacity and FLO…

  4. Close
    Auto-scaling Vision Transformers without Training
    Wuyang Chen, Wei Huang, Xianzhi Du et al. · 2022 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This work targets automated designing and scaling of Vision Transformers (ViTs). The motivation comes from two pain spots: 1) the lack of efficient and principled methods for designing and scaling ViTs; 2) the tremendous computational cost of training ViT that is much heavier than its convolution counterpart. To tackle these issues, we propose As-ViT, an auto-scaling framework for ViTs without training, which automatically discovers and scales up ViTs in an efficient and principled manner. Specifically, we first design a "seed" ViT topology by leveraging a training-free search process. This extremely fast search is fulfilled by a comprehensive study of ViT's network complexity, yielding a st…

  5. Close
    Compute Better Spent: Replacing Dense Layers with Structured Matrices
    Shikai Qiu, Andres Potapczynski, Marc Finzi et al. · 2024 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Dense linear layers are the dominant computational bottleneck in foundation models. Identifying more efficient alternatives to dense matrices has enormous potential for building more compute-efficient models, as exemplified by the success of convolutional networks in the image domain. In this work, we systematically explore structured matrices as replacements for dense matrices. We show that different structures often require drastically different initialization scales and learning rates, which are crucial to performance, especially as models scale. Using insights from the Maximal Update Parameterization, we determine the optimal scaling for initialization and learning rates of these unconve…

  6. Close
    Towards Sustainable Learning: Coresets for Data-efficient Deep Learning
    Yu Yang, Hao Kang, Baharan Mirzasoleiman · 2023 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    To improve the efficiency and sustainability of learning deep models, we propose CREST, the first scalable framework with rigorous theoretical guarantees to identify the most valuable examples for training non-convex models, particularly deep networks. To guarantee convergence to a stationary point of a non-convex function, CREST models the non-convex loss as a series of quadratic functions and extracts a coreset for each quadratic sub-region. In addition, to ensure faster convergence of stochastic gradient methods such as (mini-batch) SGD, CREST iteratively extracts multiple mini-batch coresets from larger random subsets of training data, to ensure nearly-unbiased gradients with small varia…

  7. Close
    Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers
    Katie Everett, Lechao Xiao, Mitchell Wortsman et al. · 2024 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Robust and effective scaling of models from small to large width typically requires the precise adjustment of many algorithmic and architectural details, such as parameterization and optimizer choices. In this work, we propose a new perspective on parameterization by investigating a key assumption in prior work about the alignment between parameters and data and derive new theoretical results under weaker assumptions and a broader set of optimizers. Our extensive empirical investigation includes tens of thousands of models trained with all combinations of three optimizers, four parameterizations, several alignment assumptions, more than a dozen learning rates, and fourteen model sizes up to …

  8. Close
    From Large to Small: Transferring CUDA Optimization Expertise via Reasoning Graph
    Junfeng Gong, Zhiyi Wei, Junying Chen et al. · 2025 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Despite significant evolution of CUDA programming and domain-specific libraries, effectively utilizing GPUs with massively parallel engines remains difficult. Large language models (LLMs) show strong potential in generating optimized CUDA code from sequential code. However, using LLMs in practice faces two major challenges: cloud-based APIs pose risks of code leakage, and local deployment is often computationally expensive and inefficient. These drawbacks have spurred interest in small language models (SLMs), which are more lightweight and privacy-friendly. Encouragingly, recent studies show that SLMs can achieve performance comparable to LLMs on specific tasks. While SLMs can match LLMs on …

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.