AI summary · arXiv: 1901.11184v1 · cs.AI

Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Mark O. Riedl
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 31 Jan. 2019 Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, volume 1 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Growing interaction between humans and AI systems in the field of AI and ML
  • Emergence of human-centered artificial intelligence
  • Understanding humans from a sociocultural perspective
  • Helping humans understand AI systems
  • Importance of incorporating sociocultural understanding into AI algorithms for accurate responses to human needs
  • Developing technologies that enable users to gain insights into the decision-making processes and underlying mechanisms of AI algorithms
  • Addressing social responsibility issues associated with AI technologies (fairness, accountability, interpretability, transparency)
  • Promoting trust between humans and intelligent machines through ethical design and implementation of AI algorithms

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
, , , , In the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), there is a growing interaction between humans and these advanced systems. This has led to the emergence of human-centered artificial intelligence, which emphasizes the importance of designing algorithms with an awareness that they are part of a larger system consisting of humans. Human-centered artificial intelligence can be divided into two key aspects. Firstly, there are AI systems that aim to understand humans from a sociocultural perspective. These systems take into account factors such as cultural norms, values, and social dynamics in order to better comprehend human behavior and preferences. By incorporating this sociocultural understanding, AI algorithms can provide more accurate and relevant responses to human needs. Secondly, there are AI systems that help humans understand them. As AI becomes increasingly complex and pervasive in various domains, it is crucial for individuals to have a certain level of understanding about how these systems work. Human-centered AI focuses on developing technologies that enable users to gain insights into the decision-making processes and underlying mechanisms of AI algorithms. This promotes transparency and empowers individuals to make informed decisions when interacting with AI systems. Furthermore, human-centered artificial intelligence also highlights the importance of addressing social responsibility issues associated with these technologies. Fairness, accountability, interpretability, and transparency are key considerations in ensuring that AI systems do not perpetuate bias or discrimination and operate in an ethical manner. By incorporating these principles into the design and implementation of AI algorithms, we can mitigate potential risks and promote trust between humans and intelligent machines. In conclusion, human-centered artificial intelligence recognizes the interconnectedness between humans and AI systems. By focusing on understanding humans from a sociocultural perspective as well as facilitating human comprehension of AI algorithms, we can create more effective and responsible artificial intelligence technologies.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Close
    Intent-aligned AI systems deplete human agency: the need for agency foundations research in AI safety
    Catalin Mitelut, Ben Smith, Peter Vamplew · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) systems suggests that artificial general intelligence (AGI) systems may soon arrive. Many researchers are concerned that AIs and AGIs will harm humans via intentional misuse (AI-misuse) or through accidents (AI-accidents). In respect of AI-accidents, there is an increasing effort focused on developing algorithms and paradigms that ensure AI systems are aligned to what humans intend, e.g. AI systems that yield actions or recommendations that humans might judge as consistent with their intentions and goals. Here we argue that alignment to human intent is insufficient for safe AI systems and that preservation of long-term agency of humans ma…

  2. Close
    Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People
    Brenden M. Lake, Tomer D. Ullman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al. · 2016 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has renewed interest in building systems that learn and think like people. Many advances have come from using deep neural networks trained end-to-end in tasks such as object recognition, video games, and board games, achieving performance that equals or even beats humans in some respects. Despite their biological inspiration and performance achievements, these systems differ from human intelligence in crucial ways. We review progress in cognitive science suggesting that truly human-like learning and thinking machines will have to reach beyond current engineering trends in both what they learn, and how they learn it. Specifically, we argue that …

  3. Close
    Watershed of Artificial Intelligence: Human Intelligence, Machine Intelligence, and Biological Intelligence
    Li Weigang, Liriam Enamoto, Denise Leyi Li et al. · 2021 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This article reviews the "Once learning" mechanism that was proposed 23 years ago and the subsequent successes of "One-shot learning" in image classification and "You Only Look Once - YOLO" in objective detection. Analyzing the current development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the proposal is that AI should be clearly divided into the following categories: Artificial Human Intelligence (AHI), Artificial Machine Intelligence (AMI), and Artificial Biological Intelligence (ABI), which will also be the main directions of theory and application development for AI. As a watershed for the branches of AI, some classification standards and methods are discussed: 1) Human-oriented, machine-oriented…

  4. Close
    Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligence
    Fabio Massimo Zanzotto · 2017 · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2019 · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Little by little, newspapers are revealing the bright future that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is building. Intelligent machines will help everywhere. However, this bright future has a dark side: a dramatic job market contraction before its unpredictable transformation. Hence, in a near future, large numbers of job seekers will need financial support while catching up with these novel unpredictable jobs. This possible job market crisis has an antidote inside. In fact, the rise of AI is sustained by the biggest knowledge theft of the recent years. Learning AI machines are extracting knowledge from unaware skilled or unskilled workers by analyzing their interactions. By passionately doing thei…

  5. Close
    Hybrid Intelligence
    Dominik Dellermann, Philipp Ebel, Matthias Soellner et al. · 2021 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Research has a long history of discussing what is superior in predicting certain outcomes: statistical methods or the human brain. This debate has repeatedly been sparked off by the remarkable technological advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), such as solving tasks like object and speech recognition, achieving significant improvements in accuracy through deep-learning algorithms (Goodfellow et al. 2016), or combining various methods of computational intelligence, such as fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, and case-based reasoning (Medsker 2012). One of the implicit promises that underlie these advancements is that machines will 1 day be capable of performing complex tasks or …

  6. Close
    Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles
    Andrzej Cichocki, Alexander P. Kuleshov · 2020 · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (2020) · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    This article discusses some trends and concepts in developing new generation of future Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems which relate to complex facets and different types of human intelligence, especially social, emotional, attentional and ethical intelligence. We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains. Using the concept of 'multiple intelligences' rather than a single type of intelligence, we categorize and provide working definitions of various AGI depending on their cognitive skills or capacities. Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, bu…

  7. Related
    Societal and technological progress as sewing an ever-growing, ever-changing, patchy, and polychrome quilt
    Joel Z. Leibo, Alexander Sasha Vezhnevets, William A. Cunningham et al. · 2025 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly placed in positions where their decisions have real consequences, e.g., moderating online spaces, conducting research, and advising on policy. Ensuring they operate in a safe and ethically acceptable fashion is thus critical. However, most solutions have been a form of one-size-fits-all "alignment". We are worried that such systems, which overlook enduring moral diversity, will spark resistance, erode trust, and destabilize our institutions. This paper traces the underlying problem to an often-unstated Axiom of Rational Convergence: the idea that under ideal conditions, rational agents will converge in the limit of conversation on a singl…

  8. Related
    Human-AI Symbiosis: A Survey of Current Approaches
    Zahra Zahedi, Subbarao Kambhampati · 2021 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
    Abstract

    In this paper, we aim at providing a comprehensive outline of the different threads of work in human-AI collaboration. By highlighting various aspects of works on the human-AI team such as the flow of complementing, task horizon, model representation, knowledge level, and teaming goal, we make a taxonomy of recent works according to these dimensions. We hope that the survey will provide a more clear connection between the works in the human-AI team and guidance to new researchers in this area.

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.