AI summary · arXiv: 1901.11184v1 · cs.AI
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
The essentials
- Growing interaction between humans and AI systems in the field of AI and ML
- Emergence of human-centered artificial intelligence
- Understanding humans from a sociocultural perspective
- Helping humans understand AI systems
- Importance of incorporating sociocultural understanding into AI algorithms for accurate responses to human needs
- Developing technologies that enable users to gain insights into the decision-making processes and underlying mechanisms of AI algorithms
- Addressing social responsibility issues associated with AI technologies (fairness, accountability, interpretability, transparency)
- Promoting trust between humans and intelligent machines through ethical design and implementation of AI algorithms
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Intent-aligned AI systems deplete human agency: the need for agency foundations research in AI safetyCatalin Mitelut, Ben Smith, Peter Vamplew · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) systems suggests that artificial general intelligence (AGI) systems may soon arrive. Many researchers are concerned that AIs and AGIs will harm humans via intentional misuse (AI-misuse) or through accidents (AI-accidents). In respect of AI-accidents, there is an increasing effort focused on developing algorithms and paradigms that ensure AI systems are aligned to what humans intend, e.g. AI systems that yield actions or recommendations that humans might judge as consistent with their intentions and goals. Here we argue that alignment to human intent is insufficient for safe AI systems and that preservation of long-term agency of humans ma…
-
Building Machines That Learn and Think Like PeopleBrenden M. Lake, Tomer D. Ullman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al. · 2016 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Abstract
Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has renewed interest in building systems that learn and think like people. Many advances have come from using deep neural networks trained end-to-end in tasks such as object recognition, video games, and board games, achieving performance that equals or even beats humans in some respects. Despite their biological inspiration and performance achievements, these systems differ from human intelligence in crucial ways. We review progress in cognitive science suggesting that truly human-like learning and thinking machines will have to reach beyond current engineering trends in both what they learn, and how they learn it. Specifically, we argue that …
-
Watershed of Artificial Intelligence: Human Intelligence, Machine Intelligence, and Biological IntelligenceLi Weigang, Liriam Enamoto, Denise Leyi Li et al. · 2021 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Abstract
This article reviews the "Once learning" mechanism that was proposed 23 years ago and the subsequent successes of "One-shot learning" in image classification and "You Only Look Once - YOLO" in objective detection. Analyzing the current development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the proposal is that AI should be clearly divided into the following categories: Artificial Human Intelligence (AHI), Artificial Machine Intelligence (AMI), and Artificial Biological Intelligence (ABI), which will also be the main directions of theory and application development for AI. As a watershed for the branches of AI, some classification standards and methods are discussed: 1) Human-oriented, machine-oriented…
-
Human-in-the-loop Artificial IntelligenceFabio Massimo Zanzotto · 2017 · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2019 · AI summary available
Abstract
Little by little, newspapers are revealing the bright future that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is building. Intelligent machines will help everywhere. However, this bright future has a dark side: a dramatic job market contraction before its unpredictable transformation. Hence, in a near future, large numbers of job seekers will need financial support while catching up with these novel unpredictable jobs. This possible job market crisis has an antidote inside. In fact, the rise of AI is sustained by the biggest knowledge theft of the recent years. Learning AI machines are extracting knowledge from unaware skilled or unskilled workers by analyzing their interactions. By passionately doing thei…
-
Hybrid IntelligenceDominik Dellermann, Philipp Ebel, Matthias Soellner et al. · 2021 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Abstract
Research has a long history of discussing what is superior in predicting certain outcomes: statistical methods or the human brain. This debate has repeatedly been sparked off by the remarkable technological advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), such as solving tasks like object and speech recognition, achieving significant improvements in accuracy through deep-learning algorithms (Goodfellow et al. 2016), or combining various methods of computational intelligence, such as fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, and case-based reasoning (Medsker 2012). One of the implicit promises that underlie these advancements is that machines will 1 day be capable of performing complex tasks or …
-
Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning StylesAndrzej Cichocki, Alexander P. Kuleshov · 2020 · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (2020) · Not summarized yet
Abstract
This article discusses some trends and concepts in developing new generation of future Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems which relate to complex facets and different types of human intelligence, especially social, emotional, attentional and ethical intelligence. We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains. Using the concept of 'multiple intelligences' rather than a single type of intelligence, we categorize and provide working definitions of various AGI depending on their cognitive skills or capacities. Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, bu…
-
Societal and technological progress as sewing an ever-growing, ever-changing, patchy, and polychrome quiltJoel Z. Leibo, Alexander Sasha Vezhnevets, William A. Cunningham et al. · 2025 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly placed in positions where their decisions have real consequences, e.g., moderating online spaces, conducting research, and advising on policy. Ensuring they operate in a safe and ethically acceptable fashion is thus critical. However, most solutions have been a form of one-size-fits-all "alignment". We are worried that such systems, which overlook enduring moral diversity, will spark resistance, erode trust, and destabilize our institutions. This paper traces the underlying problem to an often-unstated Axiom of Rational Convergence: the idea that under ideal conditions, rational agents will converge in the limit of conversation on a singl…
-
Human-AI Symbiosis: A Survey of Current ApproachesZahra Zahedi, Subbarao Kambhampati · 2021 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Abstract
In this paper, we aim at providing a comprehensive outline of the different threads of work in human-AI collaboration. By highlighting various aspects of works on the human-AI team such as the flow of complementing, task horizon, model representation, knowledge level, and teaming goal, we make a taxonomy of recent works according to these dimensions. We hope that the survey will provide a more clear connection between the works in the human-AI team and guidance to new researchers in this area.
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.