AI summary · arXiv: 1707.01047v1 · cs.LG
Robust Optimization for Non-Convex Objectives
The essentials
- The paper addresses the problem of robust optimization
- The authors propose a reduction from robust improper optimization to Bayesian optimization
- They utilize an oracle that provides $\alpha$-approximate solutions for distributions over objectives
- Using this oracle, they compute a distribution over solutions that is also $\alpha$-approximate in the worst case
- De-randomizing this solution is generally NP-hard, but achievable for a wide range of statistical learning tasks
- The authors apply their approach to robust neural network training and submodular optimization as specific problems
- Experimental tests are conducted on corrupted character classification and robust influence maximization in networks
- The experiments provide empirical evidence of the effectiveness and applicability of their approach
- This paper presents a novel approach to robust optimization by leveraging Bayesian optimization techniques with implications for various domains such as machine learning and network analysis.
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization ApproachWenshuo Guo, Mingzhang Yin, Yixin Wang et al. · 2022 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
Abstract
Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates. In practice, measurements of the covariates can often be noisy and/or biased, or only measurements of their proxies may be available. Directly adjusting for these imperfect measurements of the covariates can lead to biased causal estimates. Moreover, without additional assumptions, the causal effects are not point-identifiable due to the noise in these measurements. To this end, we study the partial identification of causal effects given noisy covariates, under a user-specified assumption on the noise level. The key observation is that we can formulate the identification of the average treatm…
-
Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum GameAlexander Robey, Fabian Latorre, George J. Pappas et al. · 2023 · Machine Learning · Not summarized yet
Abstract
One prominent approach toward resolving the adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks is the two-player zero-sum paradigm of adversarial training, in which predictors are trained against adversarially-chosen perturbations of data. Despite the promise of this approach, algorithms based on this paradigm have not engendered sufficient levels of robustness, and suffer from pathological behavior like robust overfitting. To understand this shortcoming, we first show that the commonly used surrogate-based relaxation used in adversarial training algorithms voids all guarantees on the robustness of trained classifiers. The identification of this pitfall informs a novel non-zero-sum bilevel fo…
-
Optimizing Optimizers: Regret-optimal gradient descent algorithmsPhilippe Casgrain, Anastasis Kratsios · 2020 · Machine Learning · Not summarized yet
Abstract
The need for fast and robust optimization algorithms are of critical importance in all areas of machine learning. This paper treats the task of designing optimization algorithms as an optimal control problem. Using regret as a metric for an algorithm's performance, we study the existence, uniqueness and consistency of regret-optimal algorithms. By providing first-order optimality conditions for the control problem, we show that regret-optimal algorithms must satisfy a specific structure in their dynamics which we show is equivalent to performing dual-preconditioned gradient descent on the value function generated by its regret. Using these optimal dynamics, we provide bounds on their rates o…
-
KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 2024 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
Abstract
Kahneman & Tversky's $\textit{prospect theory}$ tells us that humans perceive random variables in a biased but well-defined manner (1992); for example, humans are famously loss-averse. We show that objectives for aligning LLMs with human feedback implicitly incorporate many of these biases -- the success of these objectives (e.g., DPO) over cross-entropy minimization can partly be ascribed to them belonging to a family of loss functions that we call $\textit{human-aware losses}$ (HALOs). However, the utility functions these methods attribute to humans still differ from those in the prospect theory literature. Using a Kahneman-Tversky model of human utility, we propose a HALO that directly ma…
-
Oracle Efficient Online Multicalibration and OmnipredictionSumegha Garg, Christopher Jung, Omer Reingold et al. · 2023 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
Abstract
A recent line of work has shown a surprising connection between multicalibration, a multi-group fairness notion, and omniprediction, a learning paradigm that provides simultaneous loss minimization guarantees for a large family of loss functions. Prior work studies omniprediction in the batch setting. We initiate the study of omniprediction in the online adversarial setting. Although there exist algorithms for obtaining notions of multicalibration in the online adversarial setting, unlike batch algorithms, they work only for small finite classes of benchmark functions $F$, because they require enumerating every function $f \in F$ at every round. In contrast, omniprediction is most interestin…
-
Adam: A Method for Stochastic OptimizationDiederik Kingma, Jimmy Ba · 2014 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
Abstract
We introduce Adam, an algorithm for first-order gradient-based optimization of stochastic objective functions. The method is straightforward to implement and is based an adaptive estimates of lower-order moments of the gradients. The method is computationally efficient, has little memory requirements and is well suited for problems that are large in terms of data and/or parameters. The method is also ap- propriate for non-stationary objectives and problems with very noisy and/or sparse gradients. The method exhibits invariance to diagonal rescaling of the gradients by adapting to the geometry of the objective function. The hyper-parameters have intuitive interpretations and typically require…
-
Efficient Adaptive Optimization via Subset-Norm and Subspace-Momentum: Fast, Memory-Reduced Training with Convergence GuaranteesThien Hang Nguyen, Huy Le Nguyen · 2024 · Machine Learning · Not summarized yet
Abstract
We introduce two complementary techniques for efficient adaptive optimization that reduce memory requirements while accelerating training of large-scale neural networks. The first technique, Subset-Norm adaptive step size, generalizes AdaGrad-Norm and AdaGrad(-Coordinate) by reducing the second moment term's memory footprint from $O(d)$ to $O(\sqrt{d})$ through step-size sharing, where $d$ is the model size. For non-convex smooth objectives under coordinate-wise sub-gaussian gradient noise, we prove a noise-adapted high-probability convergence guarantee showing improved dimensional dependence over existing methods. Our second technique, Subspace-Momentum, reduces the momentum state's memory …
-
Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General PreferencesCorby Rosset, Ching-An Cheng, Arindam Mitra et al. · 2024 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
Abstract
This paper studies post-training large language models (LLMs) using preference feedback from a powerful oracle to help a model iteratively improve over itself. The typical approach for post-training LLMs involves Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), which traditionally separates reward learning and subsequent policy optimization. However, such a reward maximization approach is limited by the nature of "point-wise" rewards (such as Bradley-Terry model), which fails to express complex intransitive or cyclic preference relations. While advances on RLHF show reward learning and policy optimization can be merged into a single contrastive objective for stability, they yet still remai…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.