Looking for an internship or PhD? Explore research placement leads.

A real example: what you get

Example in Astrophysics Computer science and AI Biology and medicine

15 institutions, 30 people and 114 papers on “Gut Microbiome and Checkpoint Inhibitor Response”.

  • The landscape of the topic
  • 5 approaches, each named and described
  • 29 people who sign first, last or as corresponding author
  • 10 countries
  • Exports, a collection of the papers, a monthly follow-up
The landscape

The first two approaches largely synthesize mechanisms and therapeutic possibilities, with the first centered on checkpoint inhibitors and the second extending to broader cancer immunity and immunotherapy. The third emphasizes clinical associations with response and toxicity, whereas the fourth focuses on extracting predictive signatures, including functional and gene-level features, with substantial attention to lung cancer. The fifth overlaps with mechanistic …

An approach

These predominantly review papers synthesize how gut microbes, microbial metabolites, and immune interactions influence checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and toxicity, considering microbiome biomarkers and therapeutic modulation.

Checkpoint Response Mechanisms and Translation · 37 papers

The first results

  1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University CN · 9 papers
  2. University Medical Center Groningen NL · 4 papers

13 more results hidden

See a complete example, explained step by step →

Create a free account: your first search with this tool is free, its first results shown in full. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

How it works

  1. We write several searches from your topic and run them on OpenAlex, which knows the papers of journals and preprint servers with the institutions of their authors. You see the searches and can change them.
  2. An AI reads the titles and abstracts and keeps the papers that address the topic. A preprint and its published version count once.
  3. For each person: the papers they sign first, last or as corresponding author, apart from alphabetical author lists and the long lists of large collaborations; one person per ORCID. Each institution counts for its share of each paper.
  4. The papers are grouped by approach (method, data, instrument or theory), so you see who does what.
  5. With your ORCID iD, you and your co-authors of the last five years are left out when you look for referees, collaborators or competing teams.