Looking for an internship or PhD? Explore research placement leads.

A real example: what you get

Example in Astrophysics Computer science and AI Biology and medicine

15 institutions, 30 people and 59 papers on “Exomoon Detection Methods”.

  • The landscape of the topic
  • 3 approaches, each named and described
  • 28 people who sign first, last or as corresponding author
  • 11 countries
  • Exports, a collection of the papers, a monthly follow-up
The landscape

The first approach emphasizes feasibility and observational constraints across multiple detection channels, the second concentrates on modeling photometric signals and interpreting timing variations, and the third emphasizes microlensing survey forecasts together with targeted imaging and transit searches. Astrometric methods seek changes in a planet’s measured position or wavelength-dependent centre of light, whereas transit methods seek moon-related light-curve structure or timing …

An approach

These papers assess exomoon searches through interferometric and relative astrometry, spectroastrometry, planetary radial velocities, simulated and observed transits, and mutual shadows or eclipses, while examining dynamical survival, instrumental sensitivity, transit-model flexibility, and systematic noise.

Multi-method Detectability and Constraints · 36 papers

The first results

  1. Columbia University US · 7 papers
  2. Academia Sinica TW · 8 papers

13 more results hidden

See a complete example, explained step by step →

Create a free account: your first search with this tool is free, its first results shown in full. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

How it works

  1. We write several searches from your topic and run them on OpenAlex, which knows the papers of journals and preprint servers with the institutions of their authors. You see the searches and can change them.
  2. An AI reads the titles and abstracts and keeps the papers that address the topic. A preprint and its published version count once.
  3. For each person: the papers they sign first, last or as corresponding author, apart from alphabetical author lists and the long lists of large collaborations; one person per ORCID. Each institution counts for its share of each paper.
  4. The papers are grouped by approach (method, data, instrument or theory), so you see who does what.
  5. With your ORCID iD, you and your co-authors of the last five years are left out when you look for referees, collaborators or competing teams.