AI summary · arXiv: 2407.18796v1 · nucl-ex

Jet radius dependence of dijet momentum balance and suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 26 Jul. 2024 58 pages in total, author list starting page 41, 21 figures, 1 table, submitted to PRC. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HION-2024-03/ License: not stated (all rights reserved)

The essentials

  • Detailed analysis of jet radius dependence in dijet momentum balance and suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV
  • Comparison of results between Pb+Pb collisions and $pp$ collisions using data from ATLAS detector at the LHC
  • Use of varying jet radius parameters (R= 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6) for investigating impact on dijet momentum balance
  • Clear suppression of more balanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions compared to $pp$ collisions, with an enhancement for more imbalanced dijets
  • Jet radius dependence shows stronger suppression for imbalanced dijets than balanced ones
  • Pair nuclear modification factors indicate subleading jet yields are more suppressed than leading jet yields within dijets
  • Decreasing level of suppression with increasing jet radius observed, highlighting a trend in modification factors based on jet size

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Jet radius dependence

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
, , , , This paper presents a detailed analysis of the jet radius dependence of dijet momentum balance and suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, utilizing data collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The study focuses on measuring the momentum balance between leading back-to-back jets in high-energy collisions, comparing results from Pb+Pb collisions to those from $pp$ collisions. The data sets used for this analysis include 1.72 $nb^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collision data collected in 2018 and 255 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected in 2017, both at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=$ 5.02 TeV. Jets are reconstructed using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm with varying jet radius parameters ($R=$ 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6), allowing for a comprehensive investigation into the impact of jet size on dijet momentum balance. The study constructs dijet momentum balance distributions for leading jets with transverse momenta ranging from 100 to 562 GeV for smaller jet radii ($R=$ 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4) and from 158 to 562 GeV for larger jet radii ($R=$ 0.5 and 0.6). By normalizing these distributions, direct comparisons can be made between dijet yields in Pb+Pb collisions and dijet cross sections in $pp$ collisions. The results reveal a clear suppression of more balanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions compared to $pp$ collisions, alongside an enhancement for more imbalanced dijets. The observed jet radius dependence indicates that this suppression is more pronounced for imbalanced dijets than balanced ones. Furthermore, the study measures pair nuclear modification factors for jet pairs, finding that subleading jet yields are more suppressed than leading jet yields within dijets. A notable observation is the decreasing level of suppression with increasing jet radius, highlighting a distinct trend in the modification factors based on jet size. Overall, these findings provide valuable insights into jet quenching scenarios within the quark-gluon plasma environment present in high-energy nuclear collisions. The detailed analysis presented in this paper contributes significantly to our understanding of particle interactions under extreme conditions and offers new constraints for theoretical models describing these phenomena.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.