AI summary · arXiv: 2212.04474v2 · physics.ao-ph

Global warming in the pipeline

James E. Hansen (Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions, Columbia University Earth Institute, New York, NY, USA), Makiko Sato (Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions, Columbia University Earth Institute, New York, NY, USA), Leon Simons (The Club of Rome Netherlands, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands), Larissa S. Nazarenko (NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA), Karina von Schuckmann (Mercator Ocean International, Ramonville St.-Agne, France), Norman G. Loeb (NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA), Matthew B. Osman (Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA), Pushker Kharecha (Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions, Columbia University Earth Institute, New York, NY, USA),

and 7 more authorsQinjian Jin (Department of Geography and Atmospheric Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA), George Tselioudis (NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA), Andrew Lacis (NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA), Reto Ruedy (NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA), Gary Russell (NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA), Junji Cao (Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Jing Li (Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China)

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 08 Dec. 2022 48 pages, 27 figures. Correction of formatting error on page 21, which messed up placement of all following figures License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Latest research suggests that the fast-feedback equilibrium climate sensitivity for doubled CO2 is at least 4°C, with a likely range of 3.5-5.5°C
  • GHG climate forcing has increased by 4.1 W/m2 since 1750, equivalent to 2xCO2 forcing in 2021
  • Global warming in the pipeline is greater than previously estimated and eventual global warming due to today's GHG forcing alone -- after slow feedbacks operate -- is about 10°C
  • Human-made aerosols are a major climate forcing, primarily through their impact on clouds
  • A hinge-point in global warming occurred in 1970 when increased GHG warming outpaced aerosol cooling, leading to global warming of 0.18°C per decade
  • Without unprecedented global actions to reduce GHG growth, we could reach another hinge point around 2010 with global warming projected to be between 50-100% greater than in the prior forty years
  • Enormity of consequences demands a new approach addressing both legacy and future emissions if we are to "save" young people and future generations from catastrophic impacts and return to Holocene-level global temperatures urgently.
  • Three critical actions are required: implementing a globally increasing price on GHG emissions; purposeful intervention to rapidly phase down present massive geoengineering of Earth's climate; renewed East-West cooperation that accommodates developing world needs.
  • Urgent need for immediate and coordinated global action to address climate change; failure to act now will result in catastrophic consequences for future generations.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Climate Change Global Warming GHG Aerosols Holocene

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The latest research on glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change suggests that the fast-feedback equilibrium climate sensitivity for doubled CO2 (2xCO2) is at least ~4{\deg}C, with a likely range of 3.5-5.5{\deg}C. Greenhouse gas (GHG) climate forcing has increased by 4.1 W/m2 since 1750, equivalent to 2xCO2 forcing in 2021. However, global warming in the pipeline is greater than previously estimated and eventual global warming due to today's GHG forcing alone -- after slow feedbacks operate -- is about 10{\deg}C. Human-made aerosols are a major climate forcing, primarily through their impact on clouds. Paleoclimate data indicates that aerosol cooling offset GHG warming for several millennia as civilization developed. However, a hinge-point in global warming occurred in 1970 when increased GHG warming outpaced aerosol cooling, leading to global warming of 0.18{\deg}C per decade. Aerosol cooling is larger than estimated in the current IPCC report but has declined since 2010 due to aerosol reductions in China and shipping. Without unprecedented global actions to reduce GHG growth, we could reach another hinge point around 2010 with global warming in following decades projected to be between 50-100% greater than in the prior forty years. The enormity of consequences of this level of warming demands a new approach addressing both legacy and future emissions if we are to "save" young people and future generations from catastrophic impacts and return to Holocene-level global temperatures urgently. Three critical actions are required: firstly implementing a globally increasing price on GHG emissions; secondly purposeful intervention to rapidly phase down present massive geoengineering of Earth's climate; and thirdly renewed East-West cooperation that accommodates developing world needs. This research highlights the urgent need for immediate and coordinated global action to address climate change; failure to act now will result in catastrophic consequences for future generations.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.