AI summary · arXiv: 2111.06126v1 · q-bio.NC

Symptoms of depersonalisation/derealisation disorder as measured by brain electrical activity: A systematic review

Abbas Salami, Javier Andreu-Perez, Helge Gillmeister

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 11 Nov. 2021 Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2020) License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

The essentials

  • Depersonalisation/derealisation disorder (DPD) is a dissociative disorder affecting 1-2% of the population.
  • It takes an average of 7-12 years to receive an accurate diagnosis for DPD due to lack of understanding and awareness.
  • A systematic review by Abbas Salami, Javier Andreu-Perez, and Helge Gillmeister focused on exploring neural correlates of core DPD symptoms using electrophysiological techniques.
  • The research covered publications from 1992 to 2020 and aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of EEG power spectrum, event-related potentials (ERPs), vestibular and heartbeat evoked potentials as potential biomarkers for studying DPD symptoms.
  • Acute anxiety or trauma-induced disruptions in integrating interoceptive and exteroceptive signals play a significant role in the development of DPD symptoms.
  • Further research utilizing analysis methods considering signal integration is needed to address diagnostic challenges associated with DPD.
  • Tools for prospective studies focusing on electrophysiological biomarkers specific to DPD are suggested, emphasizing the urgent need to explore their diagnostic potential effectively.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Depersonalisation/derealisation disorder dissociative disorder diagnosis electrophysiological techniques neural correlates

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
Depersonalisation/derealisation disorder (DPD) is a dissociative disorder that affects 1-2% of the population. However, it often takes an average of 7-12 years to receive an accurate diagnosis. This delay can be attributed to the lack of understanding and awareness surrounding DPD. To address this issue, a systematic review was conducted by Abbas Salami, Javier Andreu-Perez, and Helge Gillmeister. The focus was on exploring the neural correlates of core DPD symptoms using electrophysiological techniques. The research covered publications from 1992 to 2020 and aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of these neuroimaging tools. The review delved into various aspects of brain electrical activity related to DPD, including the EEG power spectrum, components of event-related potentials (ERPs), as well as vestibular and heartbeat evoked potentials. These were identified as potential electrophysiological biomarkers for studying DPD symptoms. The authors argued that acute anxiety or trauma-induced disruptions in integrating interoceptive and exteroceptive signals play a significant role in the development of DPD symptoms. They also highlighted the need for further research utilizing analysis methods that consider this integration of signals to address diagnostic challenges associated with DPD. In addition, they suggested tools for prospective studies focusing on electrophysiological biomarkers specific to DPD and emphasized the urgent need to fully explore their diagnostic potential. This comprehensive review provides valuable insights into understanding and potentially diagnosing depersonalisation/derealisation disorder more effectively in clinical settings.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.