AI summary · arXiv: 2512.13539v1 · q-bio.NC

Altered oscillatory brain networks during emotional face processing in ADHD: an eLORETA and functional ICA study

Saghar Vosough (Division of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland), Gian Candrian (Brain and Trauma Foundation Grisons, Chur, Switzerland), Johannes Kasper (Praxisgemeinschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Lucerne, Switzerland), Hossam Abdel Rehim (Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Rapperswil, Rapperswil, Switzerland), Dominique Eich (Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland), Andreas Mueller (Brain and Trauma Foundation Grisons, Chur, Switzerland), Lutz Jäncke (Division of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland)

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 15 Dec. 2025 39 pages, 4 figures. This manuscript reports a source-level EEG network analysis (eLORETA and functional ICA) of oscillatory brain dynamics during cognitive and emotional Go/NoGo tasks in ADHD and control participants. Behavioral and electrophysiological results are presented. Submitted manuscript (preprint) License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • Researchers investigated neural dynamics underlying executive dysfunction and emotional processing impairments in individuals with ADHD
  • Used network-based EEG source analysis to examine oscillatory cortical activity during cognitive and emotional Go/NoGo tasks in 272 participants (102 with ADHD, 170 controls)
  • Identified ten frequency-resolved cortical networks using exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography combined with functional independent component analysis
  • Individuals with ADHD showed small increases in activation across several networks compared to controls
  • Gamma-dominant inferior temporal component displayed stronger NoGo-related activation in ADHD participants
  • Main effect of Task observed for one temporal delta component, higher activation during VCPT compared to ECPT
  • Behavioral outcomes aligned with established ADHD performance profile, showing slower responses, greater variability, and higher error rates during the emotional ECPT task
  • Findings revealed subtle alterations in oscillatory brain networks during inhibitory processing in individuals with ADHD
  • Study supports a dimensional view of ADHD neurobiology and emphasizes limited discriminative power of network-level EEG markers

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: ADHD executive dysfunction emotional processing oscillatory brain networks inhibitory processing

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In this study, researchers investigated the neural dynamics underlying executive dysfunction and emotional processing impairments in individuals with Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Using network-based EEG source analysis, they examined oscillatory cortical activity during cognitive and emotional Go/NoGo tasks in 272 participants (102 with ADHD and 170 controls, aged 6 to 60 years). The analysis involved exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography combined with functional independent component analysis, which identified ten frequency-resolved cortical networks. The results showed that individuals with ADHD exhibited statistically significant but small increases in activation across several networks compared to controls. Specifically, a gamma-dominant inferior temporal component displayed a Group effect and a Group by Condition interaction, indicating stronger NoGo-related activation in ADHD participants. Two additional components also showed similar but weaker NoGo-selective patterns. Additionally, a main effect of Task was observed for one temporal delta component, with higher activation during the VCPT compared to the ECPT. However, no Group by Task interactions were found. Behavioral outcomes aligned with the established ADHD performance profile, showing slower responses, greater variability, and higher error rates during the emotional ECPT task. Overall, the findings revealed subtle alterations in oscillatory brain networks during inhibitory processing in individuals with ADHD. These results support a dimensional view of ADHD neurobiology and emphasize the limited discriminative power of network-level EEG markers. This study provides valuable insights into the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive and emotional processing deficits in individuals with ADHD. The findings contribute to our understanding of how oscillatory brain activity is altered in ADHD and highlight the complexity of neural dynamics associated with this disorder. Further research in this area may help refine diagnostic approaches and develop targeted interventions for individuals with ADHD.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.