AI summary · arXiv: 1603.06342v1 · q-bio.NC

Functional neuroanatomy of meditation: A review and meta-analysis of 78 functional neuroimaging investigations

Kieran C. R. Fox, Matthew L. Dixon, Savannah Nijeboer, Manesh Girn, James L. Floman, Michael Lifshitz, Melissa Ellamil, Peter Sedlmeier,

and 1 more authorKalina Christoff

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 21 Mar. 2016 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Study titled "Functional neuroanatomy of meditation: A review and meta-analysis of 78 functional neuroimaging investigations"
  • Reviewed 78 functional neuroimaging studies on meditation practices
  • Meta-analysis of 257 peak foci from 31 experiments with 527 participants
  • Identified distinct brain activation patterns for common meditation styles: focused attention, mantra recitation, open monitoring, compassion/loving-kindness
  • Noted differences in activation patterns for visualization, sense-withdrawal, and non-dual awareness techniques
  • Certain brain regions like insula, pre/supplementary motor cortices consistently recruited across multiple techniques
  • Preliminary effect-size meta-analysis showed medium effects for both activations (d = .59) and deactivations (d = -.74)
  • Highlights the dissociability of various meditation methods at a neurophysiological level
  • Contributes valuable insights to contemplative neuroscience through advanced neuroimaging techniques

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Meditation Functional Neuroanatomy Meta-analysis Brain Activation Patterns Contemplative Neuroscience

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their study titled "Functional neuroanatomy of meditation: A review and meta-analysis of 78 functional neuroimaging investigations," authors Kieran C. R. Fox, Matthew L. Dixon, Savannah Nijeboer, Manesh Girn, James L. Floman, Michael Lifshitz, Melissa Ellamil, Peter Sedlmeier, and Kalina Christoff delve into the intricate world of meditation practices and their impact on brain activation patterns. Through a systematic review of 78 functional neuroimaging studies utilizing fMRI and PET techniques, the researchers conducted a meta-analysis of 257 peak foci from 31 experiments involving 527 participants. The findings revealed distinct patterns of brain activation and deactivation associated with four common styles of meditation: focused attention, mantra recitation, open monitoring, and compassion/loving-kindness. Additionally, suggestive differences were noted for three other practices: visualization, sense-withdrawal, and non-dual awareness techniques. These unique activation patterns align with the psychological and behavioral objectives of each specific meditation practice. While certain brain regions such as the insula, pre/supplementary motor cortices,dorsal anterior cingulate cortex,and frontopolar cortex were consistently recruited across multiple meditation techniques; overall convergence was found to be more of an exception than a rule. A preliminary effect-size meta-analysis indicated medium effects for both activations (d = .59)and deactivations (d = -.74), hinting at potential practical significance in understanding the neural correlates of meditation practices. The study underscores the neurophysiological dissociability of various meditation methods while also highlighting methodological concerns that warrant further investigation in future research endeavors.By shedding light on the intricate interplay between mental practices and brain activity patterns through advanced neuroimaging techniques,this research contributes valuable insights to the growing field of contemplative neuroscience.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.