AI summary · arXiv: 1605.03553v1 · q-bio.NC

Increasing cognitive-emotional flexibility with meditation and hypnosis: The cognitive neuroscience of de-automatization

Kieran C. R. Fox, Yoona Kang, Michael Lifshitz, Kalina Christoff

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 11 May. 2016 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • The chapter explores how meditation and hypnosis can alter automatic associations and elaborations of spontaneous thought.
  • Little research has addressed how internal thought patterns might change after such interventions, even though alterations in the internal flow of consciousness may precede externally observable changes in behavior.
  • There are three potential mechanisms by which meditation or hypnosis might facilitate cognitive-emotional flexibility:
  • Overall reduction of the chaining of thoughts into an associative stream
  • De-automatizing and diversifying the content of thought chains (i.e., increasing thought flexibility or variety)
  • Re-automatizing chains of thought along desired or valued paths (i.e., forming new, voluntarily chosen mental habits).
  • The authors discuss behavioral and cognitive neuroscientific evidence demonstrating the influence of hypnosis and meditation on internal cognition.
  • They highlight the putative neurobiological basis for these forms of de-automatization as well as their potential benefits.
  • Further research is needed to understand how these interventions can modify internal thought processes while also discussing existing evidence regarding their effects on behavior and cognition from a neuroscientific perspective.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Meditation

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The chapter titled "Increasing cognitive-emotional flexibility with meditation and hypnosis: The cognitive neuroscience of de-automatization" explores the potential mechanisms by which meditation and hypnosis can alter or reduce automatic associations and elaborations of spontaneous thought. The authors highlight that little research has addressed how internal thought patterns might change after such interventions, even though alterations in the internal flow of consciousness may precede externally observable changes in behavior. The chapter outlines three potential mechanisms by which meditation or hypnosis might facilitate cognitive-emotional flexibility: firstly, through an overall reduction of the chaining of thoughts into an associative stream; secondly, by de-automatizing and diversifying the content of thought chains (i.e., increasing thought flexibility or variety); and finally, by re-automatizing chains of thought along desired or valued paths (i.e., forming new, voluntarily chosen mental habits). The authors discuss behavioral and cognitive neuroscientific evidence demonstrating the influence of hypnosis and meditation on internal cognition. They also highlight the putative neurobiological basis for these forms of de-automatization as well as their potential benefits. Overall, this chapter provides a comprehensive exploration into how meditation and hypnosis can facilitate cognitive-emotional flexibility by altering automatic associations and elaborations of spontaneous thought. It highlights the need for further research to understand how these interventions can modify internal thought processes, while also discussing existing evidence regarding their effects on behavior and cognition from a neuroscientific perspective.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.