From the weekly letter · 26 October 2026

Why cover this story this week?

Listening between seizures with ultrasound

Locating the source of epileptic seizures can require invasive monitoring and waiting for seizures to occur. In a clinical preprint, researchers instead used functional ultrasound directly on exposed cortex during surgery in nine patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. They developed six markers of interictal activity—the activity between seizures—from ultrasound measurements of blood-flow dynamics. These markers distinguished seizure-onset cortex from surrounding tissue and changed in the surrounding cortex after resection.

Responsive neurostimulation also altered the measurements, with effects depending on the stimulation paradigm. Despite their very different mechanisms, stimulation and resection produced changes in the same direction across five of the six markers. That convergence makes ultrasound interesting as a complementary readout of treatment-associated brain responses. It does not yet establish that these hemodynamic markers can independently locate a seizure source or predict clinical benefit; the immediate advance is feasibility during an operation.

Editorial context written by AI from abstracts, not independent scientific validation. The kit and its verified quotes rely on the source paper, not on this letter.

Read the full letter →

Talk about a paper in public without overstating it: yours, one you are asked to comment on, or one you write about as a journalist.

  • Your paper: a draft release for your press office, the questions journalists will ask with what the paper lets you answer, the likely misreadings, a lay summary and a short thread.
  • Asked to comment: what the paper shows and does not, its strengths and weaknesses with their passages, and what would settle its main claim.
  • Writing about it as a journalist: reporting angles, the wording to check before publication, and the questions to ask the authors.
  • For everyone: findings with their passages checked word for word, the novelty set against the closest earlier papers, a hype check, figures with their credit, and researchers for an outside view who have not signed with the authors.

Discover Premium+ See an example kit