AI summary · arXiv: 2504.15908v1 · q-fin.TR

Learning the Spoofability of Limit Order Books With Interpretable Probabilistic Neural Networks

Timothée Fabre, Damien Challet

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 22 Apr. 2025 22 pages License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • The paper focuses on real-time detection of spoofing activity in limit order books, particularly on cryptocurrency centralized exchanges.
  • Innovative order flow variables based on multi-scale Hawkes processes are introduced to consider size and placement distance of new limit orders from current best prices.
  • A neural network model is trained using Level-3 data set to forecast mid-price movements based on these features.
  • Posting distance of limit orders is emphasized as crucial in the price formation process, with existing spoofing detection models lacking accuracy without considering this factor.
  • A spoofing detection framework is proposed based on probabilistic market manipulation gain of a spoofing agent.
  • Empirical analysis shows that 31% of large orders have potential to manipulate or "spoof" the market.
  • The neural network model can operate in real-time, providing a practical tool for monitoring and mitigating spoofing activities in both cryptocurrency exchanges and traditional financial markets.
  • The research contributes significantly to enhancing market integrity by offering a robust methodology for detecting and addressing spoofing behavior effectively.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Spoofing Detection

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The paper "Learning the Spoofability of Limit Order Books With Interpretable Probabilistic Neural Networks" by Timothée Fabre and Damien Challet delves into the real-time detection of spoofing activity in limit order books, specifically focusing on cryptocurrency centralized exchanges. The study introduces innovative order flow variables based on multi-scale Hawkes processes that consider both the size and placement distance from current best prices of new limit orders. By utilizing a Level-3 data set, the researchers train a neural network model to forecast the conditional probability distribution of mid-price movements based on these features. Through empirical analysis, the authors emphasize the crucial role of the posting distance of limit orders in the price formation process. They demonstrate that existing spoofing detection models that neglect this posting distance are insufficient to accurately describe market data. To address this limitation, a spoofing detection framework is proposed based on the probabilistic market manipulation gain of a spoofing agent. The trained neural network is then employed to calculate the expected gain. Applying this algorithm to all submitted limit orders during a specific period reveals that 31% of large orders have the potential to manipulate or "spoof" the market. Notably, due to its simple neuronal architecture, this model can operate in real-time, offering a practical tool for monitoring and mitigating spoofing activities in both cryptocurrency exchanges and traditional financial markets. In conclusion, this research contributes significantly to enhancing market integrity by providing a robust methodology for detecting and addressing spoofing behavior effectively. The findings underscore the importance of considering posting distances in developing accurate spoofing detection models and highlight <KD>the value</KD> <KD>of interpretable probabilistic neural networks</KD> in understanding and combating market manipulation tactics.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.