AI summary · arXiv: 1903.07222v4 · q-fin.TR

Market Making under a Weakly Consistent Limit Order Book Model

Baron Law, Frederi Viens

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 18 Mar. 2019 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Market-making model tailored for high-frequency trading under a limit order book (LOB)
  • Flexible framework allowing for arbitrary order volume, price jump, and bid-ask spread distributions
  • Ability to honor consistency of price movements upon arrivals of different order types
  • Respects the price-time priority of LOB for fair and efficient trading
  • Leverages optimal switching and impulse control techniques on marked point processes
  • Uses Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJBQVI) methods to solve the associated control problem
  • Provides full numerical analysis calibrated to the order-book statistics of a popular ETF
  • Demonstrates that profits from market-making can be overstated when dealing with LOBs exhibiting inconsistent price movements
  • Innovative market-making model designed for high-frequency trading under LOBs

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Market Making High-Frequency Trading Limit Order Book Optimal Switching Impulse Control

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper titled "Market Making under a Weakly Consistent Limit Order Book Model," authors Baron Law and Frederi Viens present a new market-making model tailored for high-frequency trading under a limit order book (LOB). The model is based on the well-known classification of order types in market microstructure and offers a flexible framework that allows for arbitrary order volume, price jump, and bid-ask spread distributions, as well as the use of market orders. One key aspect of the proposed model is its ability to honor the consistency of price movements upon arrivals of different order types. For instance, it ensures that prices never go down on buy market orders. Additionally, the model respects the price-time priority of LOB, which is crucial in maintaining fair and efficient trading. Unlike traditional approaches that rely on regular control on diffusion, such as the Avellaneda and Stoikov market-making framework, Law and Viens leverage optimal switching and impulse control techniques on marked point processes to effectively capture the features of an order book. These techniques have proven to be highly effective in modeling complex dynamics observed in real-world trading environments. To solve the associated control problem, the authors employ Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJBQVI) methods. This allows them to numerically determine optimal trading strategies using finite-difference methods. To illustrate their approach, Law and Viens provide a full numerical analysis calibrated to the order-book statistics of a popular Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF). Through simulations, they demonstrate that profits from market-making can be significantly overstated when dealing with LOBs that exhibit inconsistent price movements. Overall, this paper presents an innovative market-making model specifically designed for high-frequency trading under LOBs. By incorporating advanced techniques from optimal switching and impulse control theory, it offers insights into improving trading strategies while accounting for various order types and maintaining consistency in price movements.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.