AI summary · arXiv: 2411.08899v1 · q-fin.TR

FinVision: A Multi-Agent Framework for Stock Market Prediction

Sorouralsadat Fatemi, Yuheng Hu

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 29 Oct. 2024 Accepted at ICAIF 2024 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Financial trading is complex and challenging, requiring integration of vast amounts of data from various modalities.
  • Traditional deep learning and reinforcement learning methods have limitations, such as the need for large training data and encoding different data types into numerical formats, which can restrict explainability of model behavior.
  • Recent advancements in LLM-based agents show promise in effectively handling multi-modal data and executing complex decision-making tasks while providing insights into their processes.
  • "FinVision: A Multi-Agent Framework for Stock Market Prediction" introduces a multi-modal multi-agent system designed for financial trading tasks using specialized LLM-based agents proficient at processing various financial data forms.
  • The framework includes a reflection module that analyzes historical trading signals and outcomes to enhance decision-making capabilities for future scenarios.
  • Ablation studies indicate the significance of the visual reflection module in improving decision-making abilities within the framework.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Financial trading Multi-modal data LLM-based agents Stock market prediction Reflection module

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
Financial trading is a complex and challenging task that requires the integration of vast amounts of data from various modalities. Traditional deep learning and reinforcement learning methods have limitations as they require large training data and often involve encoding different data types into numerical formats for model input. This can restrict the explainability of model behavior. However, recent advancements in LLM-based agents have shown promise in effectively handling multi-modal data. These agents can execute complex, multi-step decision-making tasks while providing insights into their decision-making processes. In their study titled "FinVision: A Multi-Agent Framework for Stock Market Prediction," authors Sorouralsadat Fatemi and Yuheng Hu introduce a multi-modal multi-agent system specifically designed for financial trading tasks. The framework utilizes a team of specialized LLM-based agents, each proficient at processing and interpreting various forms of financial data such as textual news reports, candlestick charts, and trading signal charts. One key feature of this approach is the integration of a reflection module that conducts analyses of historical trading signals and their outcomes. The reflective process facilitated by the reflection module plays a crucial role in enhancing the decision-making capabilities of the system for future trading scenarios. The authors also conducted ablation studies that indicate the visual reflection module's significance in improving the decision-making abilities of their framework. This research contributes to advancing the field of financial trading by leveraging cutting-edge technologies like LLM-based agents to handle multi-modal data effectively and make informed decisions in complex trading environments.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.