AI summary · arXiv: 1807.02787v1 · q-fin.TR

Financial Trading as a Game: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

Chien Yi Huang

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 08 Jul. 2018 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Deep reinforcement learning can be used to develop an automatic program for generating consistent profits in the financial market
  • The author proposes a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model specifically designed for financial trading tasks
  • The state-of-the-art deep recurrent Q-network (DRQN) algorithm is used to solve the MDP model
  • Modifications are introduced to make the learning algorithm more suitable for financial trading, including a small replay memory and an action augmentation technique
  • A longer sequence is sampled for recurrent neural network training to improve efficiency
  • The online learning algorithm is validated on the spot foreign exchange market and demonstrates strong empirical performance
  • This paper offers valuable insights into adapting existing algorithms to suit financial trading tasks.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Financial Trading

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In the paper "Financial Trading as a Game: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach" by Chien Yi Huang, the author explores the potential of using deep reinforcement learning to develop an automatic program for generating consistent profits in the financial market. The recent advancements in deep reinforcement learning provide a promising framework for training such trading agents. The author proposes a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model specifically designed for financial trading tasks and solves it using the state-of-the-art deep recurrent Q-network (DRQN) algorithm. To make the existing learning algorithm more suitable for financial trading, several modifications are introduced. Firstly, a substantially small replay memory is employed, consisting of only a few hundred samples compared to millions used in modern deep reinforcement learning algorithms. This modification aims to optimize memory usage while still achieving effective training results. Secondly, an action augmentation technique is developed to reduce the need for random exploration during training. This technique provides extra feedback signals for all actions to the agent, enabling the use of greedy policy instead of commonly used epsilon-greedy exploration. However, it should be noted that this technique is specific to financial trading under certain market assumptions. Additionally, a longer sequence is sampled for recurrent neural network training. This not only improves training efficiency but also allows the agent to be trained at every T steps, reducing overall computation time by a factor of T. All these modifications are combined into a complete online learning algorithm which is validated on the spot foreign exchange market. The experimental results demonstrate strong empirical performance and highlight the potential of deep reinforcement learning in generating constant profits from financial markets. Overall, this paper presents a comprehensive approach towards utilizing deep reinforcement learning techniques for financial trading tasks and offers valuable insights into adapting existing algorithms to suit this specific domain.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.