Fast Inner-Product Algorithms and Architectures for Deep Neural Network Accelerators

Authors: Trevor E. Pogue, Nicola Nicolici

Accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Computers; Accelerator RTL and compiler source code available for reference here: https://github.com/trevorpogue/algebraic-nnhw

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.12224v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their paper titled "Fast Inner-Product Algorithms and Architectures for Deep Neural Network Accelerators," authors Trevor E. Pogue and Nicola Nicolici introduce a novel algorithm known as the Free-pipeline Fast Inner Product (FFIP) along with its corresponding hardware architecture. This innovative approach aims to enhance an underexplored fast inner-product algorithm (FIP) originally proposed by Winograd in 1968. The FFIP algorithm is versatile and applicable to various machine learning (ML) model layers that primarily involve matrix multiplication, such as fully-connected, convolutional, recurrent, and attention/transformer layers. The authors implement FIP within an ML accelerator for the first time and subsequently present the FFIP algorithm and its generalized architecture. These advancements inherently boost FIP's clock frequency, leading to improved throughput without significantly increasing hardware costs. Furthermore, the researchers contribute ML-specific optimizations tailored for both the FIP and FFIP algorithms and architectures. One of the key findings of their study is that FFIP can seamlessly integrate into traditional fixed-point systolic array ML accelerators to achieve equivalent throughput with only half the number of multiply-accumulate (MAC) units required. Alternatively, it enables a doubling of the maximum systolic array size that can be accommodated within devices operating under a fixed hardware budget. Moreover, through their FFIP implementation targeting non-sparse ML models featuring 8 to 16-bit fixed-point inputs, Pogue and Nicolici demonstrate superior throughput and compute efficiency compared to existing state-of-the-art solutions on similar compute platforms. Their research not only enhances performance metrics but also provides valuable insights for optimizing deep neural network accelerators in practical applications.
AI-generated keywords: Fast Inner-Product Algorithms Deep Neural Network Accelerators Free-pipeline Fast Inner Product FIP FFIP

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors Trevor E. Pogue and Nicola Nicolici introduce the Free-pipeline Fast Inner Product (FFIP) algorithm and its corresponding hardware architecture
  • FFIP enhances the fast inner-product algorithm (FIP) proposed by Winograd in 1968, boosting clock frequency and improving throughput without significant hardware cost increase
  • FFIP is versatile and applicable to various machine learning model layers involving matrix multiplication like fully-connected, convolutional, recurrent, and attention/transformer layers
  • Researchers implement FIP within an ML accelerator for the first time, presenting the FFIP algorithm and its generalized architecture
  • FFIP seamlessly integrates into traditional fixed-point systolic array ML accelerators, achieving equivalent throughput with half the number of MAC units or doubling maximum systolic array size under a fixed hardware budget
  • FFIP implementation targeting non-sparse ML models with 8 to 16-bit fixed-point inputs demonstrates superior throughput and compute efficiency compared to existing state-of-the-art solutions on similar platforms
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We introduce a new algorithm called the Free-pipeline Fast Inner Product (FFIP) and its hardware architecture that improve an under-explored fast inner-product algorithm (FIP) proposed by Winograd in 1968. Unlike the unrelated Winograd minimal filtering algorithms for convolutional layers, FIP is applicable to all machine learning (ML) model layers that can mainly decompose to matrix multiplication, including fully-connected, convolutional, recurrent, and attention/transformer layers. We implement FIP for the first time in an ML accelerator then present our FFIP algorithm and generalized architecture which inherently improve FIP's clock frequency and, as a consequence, throughput for a similar hardware cost. Finally, we contribute ML-specific optimizations for the FIP and FFIP algorithms and architectures. We show that FFIP can be seamlessly incorporated into traditional fixed-point systolic array ML accelerators to achieve the same throughput with half the number of multiply-accumulate (MAC) units, or it can double the maximum systolic array size that can fit onto devices with a fixed hardware budget. Our FFIP implementation for non-sparse ML models with 8 to 16-bit fixed-point inputs achieves higher throughput and compute efficiency than the best-in-class prior solutions on the same type of compute platform.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Nov. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.