Genetic-Algorithm-Based Proportional Integral Controller (GAPI) for ROV Steering Control

Authors: Ahsan Tanveer, Sarvat Mushtaq Ahmad

Engineering Proceedings 32, no. 1: 4, 2023
6 pages, 3 figures, presented at the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electronic and Telecommunication Engineering (INTERACT), published in Engineering Proceedings 32
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.10137v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This article presents an innovative approach to optimize steering control for remotely operated underwater vehicles (ROVs) using a genetic algorithm-based proportional integral controller (GAPI). The gain parameters of the PI controller are tuned using a genetic algorithm (GA), and the performance of GAPI is compared with that of a root-locus-tuned PI controller and a simulated-annealing-based PI controller (SAPI). The experimental response corresponding to the step waveform for the GA is obtained, and various response characteristics such as overshoot, peak time, and settling time are benchmarked. The findings indicate that GAPI provides considerably better performance compared to SAPI and the root-locus-tuned controller. This study highlights the effectiveness of using meta-heuristic optimization techniques like genetic algorithms in optimizing relatively straightforward controllers like PI controllers. It suggests that similar optimization techniques can be applied to develop more advanced controllers for sophisticated systems in future research. The authors' contributions include conceptualization, methodology development, software implementation, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, original draft preparation, visualization, supervision, and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. It is worth noting that this research received no external funding or Institutional Review Board approval since it did not involve human subjects. In conclusion, this article demonstrates how GAPI outperforms other tuning methods like simulated annealing and root-locus tuning in terms of steering control for ROVs. This study opens up possibilities for further research on applying similar optimization techniques to develop advanced controllers for complex systems.
AI-generated keywords: ROV Genetic Algorithm PI Controller Optimization Steering Control

AI-generated Key Points

  • Innovative approach: Genetic algorithm-based proportional integral controller (GAPI) for optimizing steering control of ROVs
  • Comparison with other tuning methods: GAPI vs root-locus-tuned PI controller and simulated-annealing-based PI controller (SAPI)
  • Performance evaluation: GAPI provides considerably better performance in terms of overshoot, peak time, and settling time
  • Effectiveness of meta-heuristic optimization techniques: Genetic algorithms can optimize relatively straightforward controllers like PI controllers
  • Potential for future research: Similar optimization techniques can be applied to develop advanced controllers for complex systems
  • Authors' contributions: Conceptualization, methodology development, software implementation, validation, analysis, investigation, data curation, draft preparation, visualization, supervision, project administration
  • Funding and approval information: No external funding or Institutional Review Board approval was involved in the research.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: This article presents the design and real-time implementation of an optimal controller for precise steering control of a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV). A PI controller is investigated to achieve the desired steering performance. The gain parameters of the controller are tuned using the genetic algorithm (GA). The experimental response corresponding to the step waveform for the GA is obtained. A root-locus-tuned PI controller alongside a simulated-annealing-based PI controller (SAPI) is used to benchmark the response characteristics such as overshoot, peak time, and settling time. The experimental findings indicate that GAPI provides considerably better performance than SAPI and the root-locus-tuned controller.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Apr. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.