Priority-Driven Safe Model Predictive Control Approach to Autonomous Driving Applications

Authors: Francesco Prignoli, Ying Shuai Quan, Mohammad Jeddi, Jonas Sjöberg, Paolo Falcone

7 pages, 5 figures, submitted to 64th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2503.15373

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2505.05933v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Abstract: This paper demonstrates the applicability of the safe model predictive control (SMPC) framework to autonomous driving scenarios, focusing on the design of adaptive cruise control (ACC) and automated lane-change systems. Building on the SMPC approach with priority-driven constraint softening -- which ensures the satisfaction of \emph{hard} constraints under external disturbances by selectively softening a predefined subset of adjustable constraints -- we show how the algorithm dynamically relaxes lower-priority, comfort-related constraints in response to unexpected disturbances while preserving critical safety requirements such as collision avoidance and lane-keeping. A learning-based algorithm approximating the time consuming SMPC is introduced to enable real-time execution. Simulations in real-world driving scenarios subject to unpredicted disturbances confirm that this prioritized softening mechanism consistently upholds stringent safety constraints, underscoring the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 May. 2025

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.